• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

No evidence against evolution

We have at least one creationist here who admits that he knows of no evidence against evolution. We have another that claims the fossil record itself is evidence against evolution?

Is there evidence against evolution in the fossil record?

Anyone else like to weigh in? Is there any evidence against evolution anywhere?

Anyone who has found some hard data that could not be found if neo-darwinian evolution were true... lets hear about it!

We may just put together the research team that wins the next Nobel Prize!

(or not)
 

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,723
Guam
✟5,182,717.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Is there evidence against evolution in the fossil record?
It's what is not there that counts.

Anyone can dig something out of the ground, assign a number to it, then play connect-the-dots, where they draw lines and claim the dots are indicative of one big process.

The truth is that macroevolution runs on the god-of-the-gaps principle.
 
Upvote 0

Targ

Regular Member
Sep 4, 2010
653
19
NSW, Australia
✟23,418.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
The truth is that macroevolution runs on the god-of-the-gaps principle.

What? If anything, it's creationism that works on the God of the gaps principle, since every missing link, every as-yet unsolved problem in evolutionary biology is taken as proof that God did it, only to be later forgotten about when a discovery / plausible explanation is found.

Consider the following comments from Ken Miller:

I don't know if our pastor sensed that his description of God as craftsman was meeting a certain tide of skepticism, but no matter...He walked over to the altar and picked up a flower from the vase.

"Look at the beauty of a flower. The Bible tells us that even Solomon in all his glory was never arrayed as one of these. And do you know what? Not a single person in the world can tell us what makes a flower bloom. All those scientists in their laboratories, the ones who can split the atom and build jet planes and televisions, well, not one of them can tell you how a plant makes flowers." and why should they be able to? "Flowers, just like you, are the work of God."

I was impressed. No one argued, no one wisecracked. We filed out of the church like good little boys and girls, ready for our First Communion the next day. And I never thought of it again, until this symposium on developmental biology. Sandwiched between two speakers working on more fashionable topics in animal development was Elliot M. Meyerowitz, a plant scientist at Caltech...I sat there with an ear-to-ear grin on my face...Meyerowitz, you see, had explained how plants made flowers.

The four principal parts of a flower...are actually modified leaves. This is one of the reasons why plants can produce reproductive cells just about anywhere...Plants can produce new flowers anywhere they can grow new leaves. Somehow, however, the plant must find a way to "tell" an ordinary cluster of leaves that they should develop into floral parts. That's where Meyerowitz's lab came in.

Several years of patient genetic study had isolated a set of mutants that could form only two or three of the four parts. By crossing the various mutants. his team was able to identify four genes that have to be turned on or off in a specific pattern to produce a normal flower. Each of these genes, in turn, sets of a series of signals that "tell" the cells of a brand-new bud to develop as sepals or petals rather than ordinary leaves. The details are remarkable, and the interactions between the genes are fascinating. To me...the scientific details were just the icing on the cake. The real message was, "Father Murphy, you were wrong." God doesn't make a flower. The floral induction genes do.

Miller K "Finding Darwin's God" (Harper 2007) p 260-262
 
Upvote 0
Sep 10, 2010
295
4
✟23,000.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What? If anything, it's creationism that works on the God of the gaps principle, since every missing link, every as-yet unsolved problem in evolutionary biology is taken as proof that God did it, only to be later forgotten about when a discovery / plausible explanation is found.

Consider the following comments from Ken Miller:

" God doesn't make a flower. The floral induction genes do."

Who made the floral induction genes?
 
Upvote 0

theFijian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 30, 2003
8,898
476
West of Scotland
Visit site
✟86,155.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
It's what is not there that counts.

Anyone can dig something out of the ground, assign a number to it, then play connect-the-dots, where they draw lines and claim the dots are indicative of one big process.

The truth is that macroevolution runs on the god-of-the-gaps principle.

Again AV, your apple challenge needs resurrecting more than this thread. But I know you'll keep ignoring it as it doesn't suit your narcissistic tendencies.

88
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
We have at least one creationist here who admits that he knows of no evidence against evolution. We have another that claims the fossil record itself is evidence against evolution?

Is there evidence against evolution in the fossil record?

Anyone else like to weigh in? Is there any evidence against evolution anywhere?

There is evidence that speaks against the claim that all "species of" life come from one common (biological) origin. If the "tree of life" were drawn from a biblical Creationist world view, it would look like "a forest" rather than one particular "tree" with one common trunk. One could draw separate trees for each "kind" or for each "day" of creation week or a number of ways.

Well "Science" moves each day closer to "the forest" view for the tree of life and farther and farther away from the single trunk tree of life. Typically every new scientific discovery pulls the forks in this view closer and closer to the ground. As a creationist, I fully expect this trend to continue its present direction till there are a number of trunks followed by some limited branching with all the "missing fossils" clustered around the branching at the base.

We can study the "evolution" of species in current time but studying the top branches does not force us to impose the same theory onto the base of the diagram.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Well "Science" moves each day closer to "the forest" view for the tree of life and farther and farther away from the single trunk tree of life.

Pro-tip - not for animals it doesn't. The "vines" around the base of the tree of life only applies to beings in which horizontal gene transfer happens easily.

Bilaterians are truly monophyletic and some studies show that all Metazoans are monophyletic.
 
Upvote 0

Agonaces of Susa

Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.
Nov 18, 2009
3,605
50
San Diego
Visit site
✟26,653.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Is there evidence against evolution in the fossil record?
Fossils of archaea, cyanobacteria, brown algae (etc.), prove there has been no evolution over hundred million year and billion year timeframes.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Pro-tip - not for animals it doesn't. The "vines" around the base of the tree of life only applies to beings in which horizontal gene transfer happens easily.

Bilaterians are truly monophyletic and some studies show that all Metazoans are monophyletic.

You're correct that the latest research leads to a different diagram that also has done little to prop up Darwinian evolution models.
badtrees.jpg
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
You're correct that the latest research leads to a different diagram that also has done little to prop up Darwinian evolution models.
badtrees.jpg

Looks like animals, plants and fungi are all on one branch there, my friend. Show me one that doesn't include humans with apes. That's the only really important part of the tree for creationists, anyway.
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
One thing i can predict with 100% certainty, this thread will produce no "evidence against evolution".

How about the fact that SATAN created evolution and gave it to Nimrod at the Tower of Babel? Well, Hespera???? Let's see you disprove that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111 :preach:
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
How about the fact that SATAN created evolution and gave it to Nimrod at the Tower of Babel? Well, Hespera???? Let's see you disprove that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111 :preach:


i feel so let down. i was so sure. Now I will have to move to mississippi and rent a trailer.
 
Upvote 0