I don't have the time or the energy to look it up. I'm just agreeing with Speedwell. I do remember distinctly you refering to bloodtypes stuff to make points about how "science proves things".
You did not.
His "chosen way" is not some trivial arbitrary choice.... Instead, it is just the correct way of how one demonstrates things.
And every time you did, we pointed out the flaws in your reasoning as well as your misunderstandings.
Which you consistently ignored or just rejected at face value.
I can't even count the amount of times that I had to explain to you how theories in science are never "proven" or considered "proven" - only ever supported by evidence.
Again, not "my way". But just "the correct way".
That makes absolutely zero sense.
Something that is "proven", will not change - since it is proven true. As in: correct, certain, the Truth (capital 'T').
The "until they do change" means that what was considered "proof", wasn't "proof" at all, since it turned out incorrect.
See?
Intellectual honesty, prevents rational people to "forget about" that.
Theories aren't facts. Theories explain facts.
Again, this makes no sense.
Evidence supports theories.
Evidence doesn't prove theories.
Theories are never proven.
Because future evidence might force you to re-evaluate.
How many times must it be repeated, before it will sink in?
There's no such thing as a "theory without a basis".
A theory in science is a well tested, well supported hypothesis.
It is the graduation stage of a scientific hypothesis. Theories don't get "promoted" to fact or law or what-have-you.
Theory is the end of the line for any explanation in science.
And it will either hold up in light of new evidence or it won't.
That's not a theory.
As I have also explained to you many times. Yet, here you are again... repeating the same nonsense that's been exposed as invalid many times over.
A theory is a well-tested, well-supported hypothesis which explains a set of facts and laws within a well-defined scope.
Your "fire burns hand" thing, is nothing like that.
I'm sorry that you can't seem to wrap your head around that.
But it is what it is.....
The only "silly" thing here, is people like you continueing to repeat utter nonsense which has been exposed as such many times over.
If you would actually understand, or take the time to learn, how science is actually done, it would prevent you from making such stupid statements. And, just to make it clear, I'm not calling YOU stupid. I'm calling your statement stupid.
Even geniuses can say stupid things ;-)
There's no such thing as "just proving it for now".
Something is either proven, or it isn't. And if it is, then it results in factual certainty.
If it later turns out that it was wrong anyway, then it was never "proven".