Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
NJ Rep cites Constitution to avoid swearing in GOP "Traitors."
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="keith99" data-source="post: 75589213" data-attributes="member: 211648"><p>Pandering to idiot voters is not treason. Actually the gross misuse of accusations of treason led to it being specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Calling the foolishness and gross misunderstanding of the exhibited by those signing on the requests to submit briefs does not even come close. And in many cases it is not clear from the documents actually submitted even which side they would have supported if allowed to submit. Oh we know, but it would be inuendo and hearsay, nothing more. </p><p></p><p>No this is not the path to take. </p><p></p><p>Those urging seccision could be a different story. Especially if there is anything even close to taking up arms. I'd personally prefer charges of sedition over treason because of the constitutional issues with treason.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="keith99, post: 75589213, member: 211648"] Pandering to idiot voters is not treason. Actually the gross misuse of accusations of treason led to it being specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Calling the foolishness and gross misunderstanding of the exhibited by those signing on the requests to submit briefs does not even come close. And in many cases it is not clear from the documents actually submitted even which side they would have supported if allowed to submit. Oh we know, but it would be inuendo and hearsay, nothing more. No this is not the path to take. Those urging seccision could be a different story. Especially if there is anything even close to taking up arms. I'd personally prefer charges of sedition over treason because of the constitutional issues with treason. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
NJ Rep cites Constitution to avoid swearing in GOP "Traitors."
Top
Bottom