New watch and consider...is the universe the result of an observer

[pshun2404]

I regret the rejection of philosophy and metaphysics, in varying degrees, by some scientists and scientifically inclined laypersons. However, readiness to contemplate alternatives, which should be a natural desire of any scientists, does not automatically confer a high level of plausibility on those alternatives.

Fair enough. I was an agnostic for the first 30 years of my life so I do get it.

 

[tas8831]

Thank you, that was excellent, sorry I cannot be perfect like you...now back to the thread....

If by perfect you mean that I do not lie, embellish, misrepresent, plagiarize, and quote mine like you do on a regular basis, you are correct.


But one can still see that you are avoiding admitting that you misrepresented the S&S paper.

One can only wonder why.... Is it because you plan to use the misrepresentation again and admitting in writing that you dishonestly/incompetently misrepresented/quote-mined it would undermine your (non)plausible deniability?

Want to explain to us all how the coccyx is not vestigial again? LOL!!!

 

[pshun2404]

If by perfect you mean that I do not lie, embellish, misrepresent, plagiarize, and quote mine like you do on a regular basis, you are correct.


But one can still see that you are avoiding admitting that you misrepresented the S&S paper.

One can only wonder why.... Is it because you plan to use the misrepresentation again and admitting in writing that you dishonestly/incompetently misrepresented/quote-mined it would undermine your (non)plausible deniability?

Want to explain to us all how the coccyx is not vestigial again? LOL!!!

Nice attempt to divert, but most are onto you by now.