• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

New Testament Apocrypha

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eusebios

Create in me a clean heart O God!
Feb 17, 2004
2,836
206
65
Canton, OH.
Visit site
✟27,812.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
II Paradox II said:
no, people have also tried to advocate for the canonicity of clement's letter to the corinthians, the didache and the shepard of hermas among others...

ken
Not to mention the protroevangelion of James, an excellent read by the way.
Under aHis Mercy,
Eusebios.
:bow:
 
Upvote 0

Crazy Liz

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2003
17,090
1,106
California
✟23,305.00
Faith
Christian
"New Testament Apocrypha" ...

Now there's a phrase I haven't heard in years and years. There really isn't any specific collection of books that is considered the New Testament Apocrypha, like the collection of Deuterocanonical books included in some Bibles, generally having been written during the Second Temple period, as the name seems to imply. Rather, for many years I have heard scholars only refer to specific books, or to categories of books, such as Gnostic gospels, infancy gospels, protogospels, acts of saints, Early Church Fathers, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Eusebios

Create in me a clean heart O God!
Feb 17, 2004
2,836
206
65
Canton, OH.
Visit site
✟27,812.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Crazy Liz said:
"New Testament Apocrypha" ...

Now there's a phrase I haven't heard in years and years. There really isn't any specific collection of books that is considered the New Testament Apocrypha, like the collection of Deuterocanonical books included in some Bibles, generally having been written during the Second Temple period, as the name seems to imply. Rather, for many years I have heard scholars only refer to specific books, or to categories of books, such as Gnostic gospels, infancy gospels, protogospels, acts of saints, Early Church Fathers, etc.
I agree Liz. it is odd terminology, though I understood the intent of the OP. Thanks for a bit of clarification.
His unworthy servant,
Eusebios.
:bow:
 
Upvote 0

Crazy Liz

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2003
17,090
1,106
California
✟23,305.00
Faith
Christian
PaladinValer said:
No; much of the NT Apocrypha contains a great deal of Holy Tradition :)

What books, exactly, does it consist of?

I have seen so many different lists that the phrase seems to have become meaningless. That is why I think it is seldom used anymore.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.