- Oct 30, 2003
- 11,154
- 562
- 44
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
I just received this e-mail. I thought you all might find it interesting. I have no idea what to think about it yet, but it will be interesting to see what Bioscientists and ethicists have to say about it.
Dear Colleague,
We report today on what will be either a great medical and scientific
breakthrough or yet another biotechnology that will cloud the ongoing
debate over stem cells and cloning. A medical doctor connected to the
President's Bioethics Council will present a theory this week that he
claims will allow for morally acceptable cloning. We do not yet have a
position on his theory. We will await word from various experts we rely
upon and will report to you immediately.
Spread the word.
Yours sincerely,
Austin Ruse
President
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
CULTURE & COSMOS
November 30, 2004 Volume 2, Number 17
Controversial Theory Claims to Discover Morally Acceptable Cloning
A member of the President's Council on Bioethics believes he may have
found a way to obtain stem cells with the same potential as embryonic stem
cells without creating or destroying a human embryo.
Dr. William Hurlbut is a medical doctor and a consulting professor in
human biology at Stanford University. An opponent of embryonic destructive
stem cell research, Hurlbut has been busy visiting prominent Catholic
clerics and other ethicists to see if the technology he proposes is
morally acceptable.
According to a recent Boston Globe story that gave extensive coverage
to Hurlbut's ideas, the new technique would mirror similar methods of
cloning. DNA from a human egg is removed and replaced with adult DNA. But
unlike traditional cloning, in Hurlbut's method the gene responsible for
creating the placenta is turned off. Hurlbut contends that this prevents
an embryo from ever being created. But like traditional cloning, the egg
still generates inner cell mass, or the "blank" cells, that some scientist
believe have the greatest research potential. The Globe reports that parts
of the technique are currently being performed on mice.
Hurlbut will present his findings at the next meeting of the
President's Bioethics Council later this week. The Council was established
by President George Bush in 2001 in the wake of his decision to deny
federal funds for stem cell research that requires the destruction of
human embryos; members "advise the President on bioethical issues that may
emerge as a consequence of advances in biomedical science and technology."
Leading up to the presentation Hurlbut has been selling the idea to
clerics like San Francsico Archbishop William Levada; Princeton professor
and Catholic intellectual Robert George; and Nigel Cameron, an Evangelical
who lectures and writes on bioethics. It has been reported that all three
are receptive to the proposal. In October he presented the idea at a
colloquium on the stem cell debate sponsored by Catholic University of
America's Columbus School of Law. Hurlbut told colloquium participants
that Archbishop Levada believes the new technology had great potential to
be acceptable and the Globe story reports that the archbishop wrote a
letter to the president offering support for Hurlbut's proposal.
There is a fundamental question that must be answered before
Hurlbut's proposal can be approved. Does the technique he proposes prevent
a human embryo from ever being created or does it actually produce a
deformed embryo? The question will require more study by serious students
of the ethical concerns that arise from cutting edge scientific
discoveries. But what Hurlbut's proposal does show is that scientific
advances may themselves offer solutions to pressing moral quandaries.
Copyright, 2004 --- Culture of Life Foundation. Permission granted for
unlimited use. Credit required.
Dear Colleague,
We report today on what will be either a great medical and scientific
breakthrough or yet another biotechnology that will cloud the ongoing
debate over stem cells and cloning. A medical doctor connected to the
President's Bioethics Council will present a theory this week that he
claims will allow for morally acceptable cloning. We do not yet have a
position on his theory. We will await word from various experts we rely
upon and will report to you immediately.
Spread the word.
Yours sincerely,
Austin Ruse
President
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
CULTURE & COSMOS
November 30, 2004 Volume 2, Number 17
Controversial Theory Claims to Discover Morally Acceptable Cloning
A member of the President's Council on Bioethics believes he may have
found a way to obtain stem cells with the same potential as embryonic stem
cells without creating or destroying a human embryo.
Dr. William Hurlbut is a medical doctor and a consulting professor in
human biology at Stanford University. An opponent of embryonic destructive
stem cell research, Hurlbut has been busy visiting prominent Catholic
clerics and other ethicists to see if the technology he proposes is
morally acceptable.
According to a recent Boston Globe story that gave extensive coverage
to Hurlbut's ideas, the new technique would mirror similar methods of
cloning. DNA from a human egg is removed and replaced with adult DNA. But
unlike traditional cloning, in Hurlbut's method the gene responsible for
creating the placenta is turned off. Hurlbut contends that this prevents
an embryo from ever being created. But like traditional cloning, the egg
still generates inner cell mass, or the "blank" cells, that some scientist
believe have the greatest research potential. The Globe reports that parts
of the technique are currently being performed on mice.
Hurlbut will present his findings at the next meeting of the
President's Bioethics Council later this week. The Council was established
by President George Bush in 2001 in the wake of his decision to deny
federal funds for stem cell research that requires the destruction of
human embryos; members "advise the President on bioethical issues that may
emerge as a consequence of advances in biomedical science and technology."
Leading up to the presentation Hurlbut has been selling the idea to
clerics like San Francsico Archbishop William Levada; Princeton professor
and Catholic intellectual Robert George; and Nigel Cameron, an Evangelical
who lectures and writes on bioethics. It has been reported that all three
are receptive to the proposal. In October he presented the idea at a
colloquium on the stem cell debate sponsored by Catholic University of
America's Columbus School of Law. Hurlbut told colloquium participants
that Archbishop Levada believes the new technology had great potential to
be acceptable and the Globe story reports that the archbishop wrote a
letter to the president offering support for Hurlbut's proposal.
There is a fundamental question that must be answered before
Hurlbut's proposal can be approved. Does the technique he proposes prevent
a human embryo from ever being created or does it actually produce a
deformed embryo? The question will require more study by serious students
of the ethical concerns that arise from cutting edge scientific
discoveries. But what Hurlbut's proposal does show is that scientific
advances may themselves offer solutions to pressing moral quandaries.
Copyright, 2004 --- Culture of Life Foundation. Permission granted for
unlimited use. Credit required.
