Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
New 9/11 Investigation Marks Decade Milestone
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Btodd" data-source="post: 58270661" data-attributes="member: 14939"><p>Actually, you're wrong.</p><p> </p><p>When speaking of WTC7 being demolished, what happened afterward (Iraq War? NIST report? What do you mean?) does not create evidence of a controlled demolition. We've seen nothing of the sort, and I've repeatedly asked for both a motive, and evidence of the supposed explosions.</p><p> </p><p>And I would like to see a source for your 'buried wreckage' claim, although that would not do anything to prove a 'shoot-down' any more than a crash. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>That doesn't even make sense. I at least give you the benefit of the doubt that you actually believe the things you say...your notion that I want to 'keep people from hearing the truth' implies that I don't even believe what I'm saying. I point out flaws in the methodology of Truthers and ask for evidence of their supposed claims because I think they're complete nonsense.</p><p> </p><p>The Twin Towers were a perfect example. I explained very well how they collapsed, and why the South Tower collapsed first. I challenged Truthers to show evidence of explosions, and got absolutely nothing. They moved on to another subject, which is usually what happens when someone is cornered and has no answers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Btodd</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Btodd, post: 58270661, member: 14939"] Actually, you're wrong. When speaking of WTC7 being demolished, what happened afterward (Iraq War? NIST report? What do you mean?) does not create evidence of a controlled demolition. We've seen nothing of the sort, and I've repeatedly asked for both a motive, and evidence of the supposed explosions. And I would like to see a source for your 'buried wreckage' claim, although that would not do anything to prove a 'shoot-down' any more than a crash. That doesn't even make sense. I at least give you the benefit of the doubt that you actually believe the things you say...your notion that I want to 'keep people from hearing the truth' implies that I don't even believe what I'm saying. I point out flaws in the methodology of Truthers and ask for evidence of their supposed claims because I think they're complete nonsense. The Twin Towers were a perfect example. I explained very well how they collapsed, and why the South Tower collapsed first. I challenged Truthers to show evidence of explosions, and got absolutely nothing. They moved on to another subject, which is usually what happens when someone is cornered and has no answers. Btodd [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
New 9/11 Investigation Marks Decade Milestone
Top
Bottom