Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
He needs a haircut? Or is he from the sixties? "A refugee from a gorilla love in." Just guessing.
3. bastardizes academia to acadelmia
Imagine that: deflecting to an absolute minor point, so to obfuscate the essence: that you try to smear science, and have only ridicue by lack of valid arguments.aceldama
Oh, I still gave you too much credit. I will assess you lower then.Pluto is finally getting some respect — not from astronomers, but from wordsmiths.
"Plutoed" was chosen 2006's Word of the Year by the American Dialect Society at its annual meeting Friday.
To "pluto" is "to demote or devalue someone or something," much like what happened to the former planet last year when the General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union decided Pluto didn't meet its definition of a planet.
SOURCE
Imagine that: deflecting to an absolute minor point, so to obfuscate the essence: that you try to smear science, and have only ridicue by lack of valid arguments.
Oh, I still gave you too much credit. I will assess you lower then.
According to Nebraska Man - Wikipedia , the name was first used by Henry Fairfield Osborn in 1922, in a paper entitled 'Hesperopithecus, the first anthropoid primate found in North America', Science, 55 (427), 463-465.Then who named it Hesperopithecus haroldcookii?
I don't buy into the idea that scientists knew better from the get-go.
According to Nebraska Man - Wikipedia , the name was first used by Henry Fairfield Osborn in 1922, in a paper entitled 'Hesperopithecus, the first anthropoid primate found in North America', Science, 55 (427), 463-465.
The dishonest part came when creationists took that imaginative magazine cover, and pretended that scientists were claiming that they had evidence for what the fossil looked like.I agree.
It was an honest mistake.
It was found by a dinosaur specialist, who noted that the tooth was shaped very much like a primate tooth. When a mammal specialist took a look at it, he identified it as a the tooth of a peccary, which was oddly worn down in a way that made it look like that of an ape.Then who named it Hesperopithecus haroldcookii?
I don't buy into the idea that scientists knew better from the get-go.
It was found by a dinosaur specialist, who noted that the tooth was shaped very much like a primate tooth. When a mammal specialist took a look at it, he identified it as a the tooth of a peccary, which was oddly worn down in a way that made it look like that of an ape.
Science checks it's findings. Reproducibility is a big deal. Hence, the error was quickly found and corrected. The "wormhole" defense for distant supernovas will no doubt be circulating even though the facts won't support that belief.What's your point?
Science checks it's findings.
The "wormhole" defense for distant supernovas will no doubt be circulating even though the facts won't support that belief.
If you get to call in an unscriptural miracle to cover all the flaws in your story then every story is equally plausible. "It was a miracle!!!!"Show me one instance where your facts supported a miracle.
Nothing man can do, works better for explaining the physical universe. I get the jealousy, but it's misplaced.Science lights fires, then puts them out.
Sorry, imaginary angel homes don't do any better.QV please:
If you get to call in an unscriptural miracle to cover all the flaws in your story then every story is equally plausible. "It was a miracle!!!!"
Sorry, imaginary angel homes don't do any better.
It's no wonder you're perplexed.
Quite a fable.
What's yours? That scientists sometimes misidentify fossils?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?