- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,196
- 51,516
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
This is a drawing of Hesperopithecus haroldcookii.
What's wrong with this picture?
I'm wondering if those horses belong in there too.At first I thought, "Camels?" But then I remembered learning something about camels in North America a long time ago. I looked it up and sure enough camels evolved in North America over 44 million years ago.
His skin is the wrong colour?
This is a drawing of Hesperopithecus haroldcookii.
What's wrong with this picture?
For one thing ... yes.His skin is the wrong colour?
Fossils of camels and hippos and horses are found at Ashfall State Park in Nebraska. It was a watering hole covered in volcanic ash as these animals presumably sought refuge and were quickly buried in the ash mud. But there are no humanoid fossils in that strata.I'm wondering if those horses belong in there too.
Perhaps an expert on this subject could chime in here?
(But let's not get side-tracked off the main point though. )
Okay -- thanks for the info.Fossils of camels and hippos and horses are found at Ashfall State Park in Nebraska. It was a watering hole covered in volcanic ash as these animals presumably sought refuge and were quickly buried in the ash mud. But there are no humanoid fossils in that strata.
This is a drawing of Hesperopithecus haroldcookii.
What's wrong with this picture?
Okie doke.Nothing. It is as valid as any picture of a fictional character.
The tooth that gave rise to this story was traced to where the rest of the fossil remains were then excavated. A fossilized peccary, a sort of pig. Whoops.Okie doke.
Hesperopithecus haroldcookii is a fictional character.
Has science labeled any other fictional characters with their nomenclature?
Okie doke.
Hesperopithecus haroldcookii is a fictional character.
Has science labeled any other fictional characters with their nomenclature?
Your point?The tooth that gave rise to this story was traced to where the rest of the fossil remains were then excavated. A fossilized peccary, a sort of pig. Whoops.
In the case of Nebraska Man, that was a little premature, don't you think?Humans, using that tool, do the labelling.
The drawing of 'Nebraska Man' was highly accurate with camels and horses and all except for there being no Nebraska Man.Your point?
This is a drawing of Hesperopithecus haroldcookii.
Oh, okay.The drawing of 'Nebraska Man' was highly accurate with camels and horses and all except for there being no Nebraska Man.
Where did his binomial come from?Not really.
"Mr. Forestier has made a remarkable sketch to convey some idea of the possibilities suggested by this discovery. As we know nothing of the creature's form, his reconstruction is merely the expression of an artist's brilliant imaginative genius."
So did most scientists back in the 1920's. We all know you are reluctant to admit that, but it's simply dishonest to claim Nebraska Man was accepted by more than a handful of scientists.Oh, okay.
I agree.
Where did his binomial come from?So did most scientists back in the 1920's. We all know you are reluctant to admit that, but it's simply dishonest to claim Nebraska Man was accepted by more than a handful of scientists.
This is a drawing of Hesperopithecus haroldcookii.
What's wrong with this picture?