• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Navy SEALS Have No Security

Status
Not open for further replies.

Imaginosis

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2005
467
8
✟645.00
Faith
Christian
At the Navy Amphibious Base in Coronado, the public can easily view Navy SEALS training on public beaches. Doesn't this pose a security problem, an easy target for terrorist? Instead of terrorist/rebels waiting for SEALS to get to Iraqi/Afghanistan, why not attack them at their home base? SEALS are much easier targets training on public beaches, such as the one adjacent to the Hotel Del Coronado.
 

3girls2dogs

Catholic
Aug 15, 2005
14,755
572
56
Arizona
✟40,188.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
At the Navy Amphibious Base in Coronado, the public can easily view Navy SEALS training on public beaches. Doesn't this pose a security problem, an easy target for terrorist? Instead of terrorist/rebels waiting for SEALS to get to Iraqi/Afghanistan, why not attack them at their home base? SEALS are much easier targets training on public beaches, such as the one adjacent to the Hotel Del Coronado.
Training happens in the middle of town here in Yuma. It's not like they don't know we train. I don't view it as a threat.
 
Upvote 0

3girls2dogs

Catholic
Aug 15, 2005
14,755
572
56
Arizona
✟40,188.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Because we are an active military facility. I'm not quite sure what point you are trying to get at. These are secure areas. Coronado is a Naval Base, Yuma is a Marine Corps Air Station. It isn't like we are all a bunch of lackeys here being sitting ducks.

What exactly is it that you are asking?
 
Upvote 0

Sybaris

Senior Member
Mar 7, 2004
644
11
✟23,414.00
Faith
Atheist
Why don't terrorist strike down town Yuma during military exercises? An easy target.

A question you would have to ask terrorists but I'll speculate.......

a) They don't have the infrastructure within the U.S. to do it.
b) It's not as easy as you think.
c) Attacking it wouldn't achieve their goals.

If you are going to attack something in the homeland of your enemy and you do not have a force of any appreciable size to do it with, what do you attack that would have the greatest effect? You attempt to destroy something that would have a huge economic, social, or political impact.

Read up on Insurgency's and 4th Generation Warfare.
 
Upvote 0

Imaginosis

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2005
467
8
✟645.00
Faith
Christian
a) They don't have the infrastructure within the U.S. to do it.
b) It's not as easy as you think.
c) Attacking it wouldn't achieve their goals.

If you are going to attack something in the homeland of your enemy and you do not have a force of any appreciable size to do it with, what do you attack that would have the greatest effect? You attempt to destroy something that would have a huge economic, social, or political impact.
You make excellent points, but if a lone gun man can walk onto a college campus and kill many, then why can't a lone terrorist walk onto the public beach next to the Hotel Del Coronado where SEALS candidates frequently run by and start shooting? Wouldn't this have a devasting effect on the SEAL communities moral, not to mention disrupting training, resulting in less SEALS deployed to the Middle East? Also, SEAL commanders would probably consider public beaches unsafe for training. Thus, Navy Special Warefare would have to relocate to a secure location, further disrupting training, all because of ONE LONE GUN MAN.
 
Upvote 0

3girls2dogs

Catholic
Aug 15, 2005
14,755
572
56
Arizona
✟40,188.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You make excellent points, but if a lone gun man can walk onto a college campus and kill many, then why can't a lone terrorist walk onto the public beach next to the Hotel Del Coronado where SEALS candidates frequently run by and start shooting? Wouldn't this have a devasting effect on the SEAL communities moral, not to mention disrupting training, resulting in less SEALS deployed to the Middle East? Also, SEAL commanders would probably consider public beaches unsafe for training. Thus, Navy Special Warefare would have to relocate to a secure location, further disrupting training, all because of ONE LONE GUN MAN.
Yea, it doesn't work like that.
 
Upvote 0

Billnew

Legend
Apr 23, 2004
21,246
1,234
60
Ohio
Visit site
✟50,363.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Were there SEALs in the twin towers?
You'll never know. Seals never appear until its to late to escape.;)

Alot of bases seem easy targets. and the "lone gunman" could kill some military people. Military in a peaceful situation are at the mercy of the loan violent person, because we can't defend against one person.

The loan gunman wouldn't get far.

I made one transmission during a situation(a bicyclist riding a bike without a light during dark, was upset at the Law enforcement person) and got 20 people to my building in 2-3 minutes, all armed(Air Force always have a mag in the weapon when on duty.)
He recieved a ticket for riding and it was signed by every person responding.

Each base is different, but they appear an easy target,
but everybase can arm the majority of people on base rather quickly.
And trained Seals are very good at adapting to the situation rather quickly, so they might get a couple, but they won't get far.
 
Upvote 0

thecountrydoc

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2006
2,745
58
85
San Marcos, CA
✟70,664.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Speaking as someone that is more than a little familiar Naval Ops in the San Diego County area, including Coronado, let me assure you that you have a greater risk of being struct by lightening during a church service than a Seal has of becoming the target of terrorist while training along the Coronado Silver Strand.

Respectfully, your brother in Christ,
Doc
 
Upvote 0

Gwenyfur

Legend
Dec 18, 2004
33,343
3,326
Everywhere
✟74,198.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Constitution
Let's just say I really don't like where this thread is going...

While for tactical and operation training I can see the why/how one would like to speculate an attack

However, not on my watch

knock it off
or the thread will close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3girls2dogs
Upvote 0
S

Sakaragi

Guest
ok, so SEALS train in an area that's visible. Do you actually see them in their exercises?

Let me put it to you this way. When I was training in Camp Pendleton, you might see some recon guys. They'd be on a run maybe, or see them on the way to the chow hall or barracks or px or whatnot, but I never saw them training, despite that they were still in their training school.

However, I did "experience" their training, yet I never saw them. MCT, Field Exercise. We were in the hills, in a little pit. Our platoon keeping up security, watching for any movement in the distance, or anyone trying to infiltrate our little "base". We had around 70 Marines keeping security.

What happened? They snuck in anyway with all the security, they stole some gear, crawled through the hills right next to us, and lasered us(sniper fire).

So all in all, whether we see them or not, they'd still own, and I seriously doubt you can learn their tactics by just looking at them.
 
Upvote 0

selfintercession

Contributor
Jan 2, 2005
6,416
518
Ottawa, Canada
✟31,675.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
CA-Liberals
Also speaking about such things can unwittingly lead to information leaked, eheh.
I can see the mod's concerns, in a way.
But one lone gun man? It would be counter-productive, as all bases' security would be beefed up, and such and such, then any future planned attacks on bases would become taht much more difficult.
Common sense.
Please. This is like when they tell us not to discuss the type of equipment we use at the airport with the public when the info is 100% accessible online as long as you're willing to put a little research in.

This kind of info is not secret or even hard to find which is the cause of most of these people's concerns. Myself, I say we needto do our best to keep our people, our nations and our freedoms safe, but paranoia will only make that mission harder.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.