Natural science has reached its natural boundaries

[TBDude65]

I have my own science, the True One. The science is the Quest for Knowledge. Thus, the Theology, the Archeology, the Philosophy are also the sciences.

That isn't science. You can't simply take a word with a clearly defined meaning and alter it to turn it into something completely different and expect to be taken seriously. That is blatantly dishonest.

 

[joinfree]

Natural science has reached its natural boundaries

The natural boundary of science is nature itself. We have a very VERY long way to go before that boundary even registers in the far FAR distance.

I am the author in top American physical journal Physical Review. I guess, I realize the things better: I am insider.

 

[joinfree]

That isn't science. You can't simply take a word with a clearly defined meaning and alter it to turn it into something completely different and expect to be taken seriously. That is blatantly dishonest.

Why Nihilism nihilates all variety of Humanitarian Science?

 

[TBDude65]

Why Nihilism nihilates all variety of Humanitarian Science?

I still have no clue what you think you are saying.

Why don't we start here: What do you think science is?

 

[joinfree]

I still have no clue what you think you are saying.

Why don't we start here: What do you think science is?

The science is Quest for Knowledge. Thus, History is also Science.

 

[TBDude65]

The science is Quest for Knowledge. Thus, History is also Science.

Philosophy is the quest for knowledge. Thus, any subject that pursues greater knowledge of that subject can be done philosophically. That is why you can get a PhD in basically any subject, regardless of whether or not it is a scientific discipline or not.

Your definition of science is completely incorrect.

 

[VirOptimus]

And what my God thinks about the division between Him and the mind?

....

this makes no sense.

 

[JackRT]

I am the author in top American physical journal Physical Review. I guess, I realize the things better: I am insider.

Well, good for you. You just set yourself up as an authority. I can play that game too. I am a scientist, mathematician and educator now retired.

 

[bhsmte]

The science is Quest for Knowledge. Thus, History is also Science.

Nope. But, i am quite certain you need to believe that.

 

[joinfree]

Well, good for you. You just set yourself up as an authority. I can play that game too. I am a scientist, mathematician and educator now retired.

Would you read my results? If yes, would you publish them with me?

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

So, the absence of properties does exists.
Reality by definition is the sum of things, that exists (like the absence of properties).

It's not so clear. The behaviour of a quantum system is well-described by its wavefunction, which accurately tells you the probabilities of the possible outcomes of measurements made on it, so it has some persistent nature. The question is what happens when a measurement or observation occurs (i.e. some interaction that releases information about the system into the general environment), and whether the results of a measurement reveal properties of the system or artefacts of the measurement process - bearing in mind that measuring different 'properties' may produce seemingly incompatible results, and attempting a measurement may change the behaviour of the system beyond the classical 'observer effect'.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

There is infinity of eternity after death. Take your time to get the message.

It shouldn't take that long for you to communicate effectively.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

Reread, i have made it better.

Nope, it's still gibberish (although I suppose it might be better gibberish).

 

[joinfree]

Nope, it's still gibberish (although I suppose it might be better gibberish).

I have edited this part:

Natural science has reached its natural boundaries (Dark Matter, Dark Energy, the absence of a Unified Field Theory, UFO sightings on the Discovery scientific channel, weather anomalies that have become a harmful norm. The fundamental Science discovers much less than the applied Science. How many new fundamental particles the LHC in CERN has discovered? It has confirmed the long known Higgs Boson and that's it. In many research fronts, the scientists have met the boundary of natural science).

 

[joinfree]

It shouldn't take that long for you to communicate effectively.

If there is a grammar error, then prove it!

 

[joinfree]

It's not so clear. The behaviour of a quantum system is well-described by its wavefunction, which accurately tells you the probabilities of the possible outcomes of measurements made on it, so it has some persistent nature. The question is what happens when a measurement or observation occurs (i.e. some interaction that releases information about the system into the general environment), and whether the results of a measurement reveal properties of the system or artefacts of the measurement process - bearing in mind that measuring different 'properties' may produce seemingly incompatible results, and attempting a measurement may change the behaviour of the system beyond the classical 'observer effect'.

The Quantum Mechanics has consistent math and the Copenhagen Interpretation. A "quantum particle" appeared as wave or as material particle, but not together at the same time. So, the QM is logical.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

If there is a grammar error, then prove it!

Not difficult: "The f Fundamental S science discovers much less than the applied S science. How many new fundamental particles has the LHC in at CERN has discovered?"

But there's more to effective communication than poor grammar - everyone makes mistakes, especially if English isn't their native language.

It's more important to be clear and coherent.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

The Quantum Mechanics has consistent math and the Copenhagen Interpretation. A "quantum particle" appeared as wave or as material particle, but not together at the same time. So, the QM is logical.

Other interpretations are available, and there's more to QM than wave-particle duality; but yes, it's logical to the extent that it is consistent with the mathematical quantum formalism.

Your point was?

 

[bhsmte]

Would you read my results? If yes, would you publish them with me?

Results of what exactly?

 

[joinfree]

Results of what exactly?

The insides to Information Loss in Black Holes.