• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

My Thoughts On The "Split"..

IntoTheCrimsonSky

~ ¤ Love. It's in you. ¤ ~
Mar 10, 2007
3,235
125
37
Ontario, Canada
Visit site
✟26,569.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Hey Everyone,

To begin with, I'd like to apologize if this comes out as a rant in any way. That is not my intention. I'm just genuinely bothered by what I am seeing going on with this subject and feel I'd rather post a new thread about it, rather than an opinion in the various ones there are.

Over the past week I've been too busy to be here much, but have tried to be around for the poll voting whenever possible. (Thank you for keeping me updated on the various things going on, by the way, Lainie!). Anyway, I got a chance to check things out a bit more and found all of this stuff about a proposed split.

I want to express how deeply saddened I am by this. To see us all in such a state that we need to separate, or that it's even being considered in a serious manner! Oh Lord, how Satan has gotten into our midst! To see His church (meaning Christian church, no debating whether it's the remanent or not) in such a state! That we can let technicalities such as doctrinal beliefs create a wall between us that overrides the love!? *shakes her head* This is just..so sad.

You know, I remember once (before I came here) that an Adventist friend of mine said he got so angry when he saw people who called themselves Adventists yet they did not believe the 27 (28 now) fundamental beliefs. To him, why would someone want to do that in the first place? It's either lying to people because they will assume you believe something you don't, or it's creating a bad image for the church itself (Which 'this' arguing is doing). At the time I could sort of agree, but figured it was better to see someone at least a believer than not. Especially since I have not fully decided on everything yet, being new.

When I came here I saw a 'bit' of this. I couldn't figure out why so many people felt so differently about the main beliefs..but let it slide, figuring it's better we discuss them because 'someone' is right, no? Now, though, it has gotten to the point that we actually want to divide the church into two separate parts? I understand that the beliefs many Progressives hold are different than Traditionals, so maybe this is the only way that both will be happy..But I honestly hope not. Actually, I find it sad and hard enough to even label people as a Traditional or a Progressive. Do you guys have any idea what this looks like to newbies? It's not giving a good feel about our church, nor will having two separate areas in general.

Now, I'm aware that nothing I say is going to magically transform anyone's beliefs..and I do not wish for that to happen. I'd rather see every person believe differently as long as they are 'true' to what they believe, and have valid reasons with themselves for those beliefs. What hurts me (and God too, I bet) is when this difference in beliefs turns into issues that become greater than love and acceptance of one another. Especially when those who are His followers are concerned.

Has it really gotten to the point that we cannot live with eachother in the limited time we spend at this forum in a peaceful, understanding environment? Is it so that moderators or separate sub-forums are simply not enough now because we cannot be fair to eachother in the main area? *Sigh*

To be clear on this, I voted for the Progressive sub-forum in the first poll because I felt it was only fair since we wanted a Traditional one. Why shouldn't there be a place that people of the same beliefs can go and discuss them without creating debate? I did find it interesting, though, that many only wanted a debate forum rather than a Progressive one. It sort of makes you question why they would only be interested in debate, and not fellowship of like-minds. However, that is not for me to decide because I am not a part of that.

Actually, don't even consider myself a Traditional or Progressive. If people must know, I believe in all of the fundamental beliefs. I have not yet decided on Ellen White, though, because I am trying to focus on scripture study before I branch out to her books. I have no problem calling myself an Adventist with this, however, because I am not against her. I simply have no opinion at all...yet.

I want people to know that I'm not going to be voting for or against the split as of this point. I don't feel that I have been around enough of what is causing the issue to have a educated judgement on this. Also, I'm neither here nor there. I honestly have hope that we can live in peace and respect one another as Adventists, with sub-forums for specific purposes. We are all Christians, so I hope we could act like them. :) But if this is the only way it will work, then I trust you guys to decide on that. I just don't feel comfortable choosing.

I hope you all understand where I'm coming from, and know that I love you all dearly..Because you are all my brothers and sisters in Christ. I sincerely hope that God's Will will be done in this matter, and not Satan's.

Love, Blessings, and Prayers
Sarah
 
T

TrustAndObey

Guest
Sarah, I have to go make dinner so I don't have a lot of time to respond. My response is gonna look small compared to your opening statement. :)

The church itself isn't being split. Progressives still attend Traditional churches, they just don't agree with a lot of what is studied and preached there.

There is no official "progressive" Adventist. It's not a recognized denomination.

The split would just be for this forum, and nothing more.

Sorry, that really is all I have time to respond with right now.

I'll BBL though.
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
From the words of wisdom of the book..

Am 3:3 Can two walk together, except they be agreed?

There is no agreement here between the factions.

Until those who wish to change the doctrines of the SDA church learn to present their cases in a Christlike manner, and until they understand that we have rejected their 'enlightenment'--there can never be peace in this forum.

It's a sad step to be sure, but a neccessary one.
 
Upvote 0

RC_NewProtestants

Senior Veteran
May 2, 2006
2,766
63
Washington State
Visit site
✟25,750.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What this poll is about is can traditional and progressives even debate together on the Adventist forum.

Poll Options Should the SDA Forum Be Split?
Yes, split the two into separate forums.
No, leave them in one area but have stricter rules to prevent personal attacks.

All those who vote for yes are saying that traditionals and progressive SDA's cannot even debate together even though we have already voted and approved a debate forum. There is only one acceptable answer to this poll and that is the no vote. This is why this poll should never have been posted because it violates the previous vote.

So I am going to vote "no" now and if anyone has any consistency and order for the rule making process they should vote "no" now also. Or who knows maybe the next poll will reverse this poll!
 
Upvote 0

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Do evangelical's speak in tongues too? I know of one SDA girl who did. She gave up all that truth so she could babble--wow.

Interesting post from someone who is always accusing me of 'baiting'.

I won't take the bait though. I really don't have the desire to interact with you on any level.
 
Upvote 0

IntoTheCrimsonSky

~ ¤ Love. It's in you. ¤ ~
Mar 10, 2007
3,235
125
37
Ontario, Canada
Visit site
✟26,569.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Sarah, I have to go make dinner so I don't have a lot of time to respond. My response is gonna look small compared to your opening statement. :)

The church itself isn't being split. Progressives still attend Traditional churches, they just don't agree with a lot of what is studied and preached there.

There is no official "progressive" Adventist. It's not a recognized denomination.

The split would just be for this forum, and nothing more.

Sorry, that really is all I have time to respond with right now.

I'll BBL though.

I know that it's only about a forum split, Sis, but it goes much deeper than that. Granted we represent a very 'small' majority of Adventists here, but we still do represent them nontheless. When I say "church" in my post, I'm more refering to the fact we are part of this church.

Having sub-forums is one thing, but to divide our religion into two types in the main section is another. It's going to give a very different impression to those who do not know the indepth issues here as we do.

I was speaking to a good friend of mine earlier about this. She is not Adventist, nor does she really know much about us apart from a few things from myself. I asked her what she'd think to come and see what is going on now between the different sides of this..and she said she'd think it was messed up and would leave our forum. (Granted, that's a good reason for the split) When I asked her what impression she would get of the church as a 'whole' (including if we have the split forums), she said it would actually turn her away from ever deciding to attend one of our churches. It screams underlying issues, even just within our small group.

First impressions are lasting, are they not? ;)

Also, regardless, this is an issue that does extend beyond this forum. I see it in the fact my church is probably considered "progressive" in many ways, while the other one in my city is very traditional. That says a lot to someone who is entering the church, and it was confusing even to me at first..That the same faith can be so opposite.

This is why I am so saddened to see the extent it has gotten here. It speaks volumes for what is outside, in the real world.

I know, it does seem bad. But, this forum has had a lot of flaming recently, so a split is for the forum's own good. It is not what we wanted but something has to be done.

I agree. I just don't feel that I'm in a position to choose either side. It's gotten bad around here, yes. I have faith you guys can do what's best. :)

From the words of wisdom of the book..

Am 3:3 Can two walk together, except they be agreed?

There is no agreement here between the factions.

Until those who wish to change the doctrines of the SDA church learn to present their cases in a Christlike manner, and until they understand that we have rejected their 'enlightenment'--there can never be peace in this forum.

It's a sad step to be sure, but a neccessary one.

I also agree with this. To an extent. Obviously some people haven't rejected these progressive ideas, and who knows..maybe there's some truth to them. Who am I to judge? ;)

This is an issue that comes down to how we repect eachother as fellow children of God. Simple as that. Right now, that respect has gotten so low that we are considering splitting from eachother. Sigh.

What this poll is about is can traditional and progressives even debate together on the Adventist forum.



All those who vote for yes are saying that traditionals and progressive SDA's cannot even debate together even though we have already voted and approved a debate forum. There is only one acceptable answer to this poll and that is the no vote. This is why this poll should never have been posted because it violates the previous vote.

So I am going to vote "no" now and if anyone has any consistency and order for the rule making process they should vote "no" now also. Or who knows maybe the next poll will reverse this poll!

I voted for all of the subforums before, but I won't vote no for this. Or yes. In my opinion it's a completely different issue. When that poll was issued, there was no option for a complete forum split. No one had proposed it yet. Thusly, both polls are just as valid. If this one goes with a no, then the first one will be put into play. If it comes with a yes, and the mods are willing..Then we will split.

To say it's not valid is like saying that someone cannot learn more from something. New thoughts and ideas have surfaced, so they must be addressed. As sad as they are.

Blessings and Love,
Sarah
 
Upvote 0

RC_NewProtestants

Senior Veteran
May 2, 2006
2,766
63
Washington State
Visit site
✟25,750.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
To say it's not valid is like saying that someone cannot learn more from something. New thoughts and ideas have surfaced, so they must be addressed. As sad as they are.

No the poll is what brought up the issue, it was not discussed prior and there was no discussion about what the poll would entail.
 
Upvote 0

IntoTheCrimsonSky

~ ¤ Love. It's in you. ¤ ~
Mar 10, 2007
3,235
125
37
Ontario, Canada
Visit site
✟26,569.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
No the poll is what brought up the issue, it was not discussed prior and there was no discussion about what the poll would entail.
Ah! I did not realize there wasn't a thread discussing it. That's the problem with coming in after things already got deeper into it. Still though, people are talking about it now..so I would think it's valid at this point.
 
Upvote 0

IntoTheCrimsonSky

~ ¤ Love. It's in you. ¤ ~
Mar 10, 2007
3,235
125
37
Ontario, Canada
Visit site
✟26,569.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

IntoTheCrimsonSky

~ ¤ Love. It's in you. ¤ ~
Mar 10, 2007
3,235
125
37
Ontario, Canada
Visit site
✟26,569.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Ice and RC weren't involved in that discussion, apparently. Maybe they didn't realize the thread was there at the time. Actually, there were only about five people in that thread.

Oops.:sorry:
Well..maybe it shoulda been kept going longer before an actual poll was created, but that doesnt matter now. :) It was technically discussed, and now we can discuss it more.
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,398
524
Parts Unknown
✟527,659.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
From the words of wisdom of the book..

Am 3:3 Can two walk together, except they be agreed?

There is no agreement here between the factions.
this is just not TRUE. if you were not so busy you could take time to understand the the agreed upon points. then maybe you would not be So hostile



Until those who wish to change the doctrines of the SDA church learn to present their cases in a Christlike manner, and until they understand that we have rejected their 'enlightenment'--there can never be peace in this forum.
you are setting up your own standard and making your own judgement and passing it off as law. ARROGANCE

will you accept the challange I put to you. I will pose questions and you will answer. ONLY YOU.
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,398
524
Parts Unknown
✟527,659.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Agreed upon points.
1. Jesus - as lord and savior
2Sabbath- most all branches agree on the
3. second coming - visible
4. State of the Dead
5. Spiritual Gifts - Although not egw
6. Scripture as the binding
7. the historicst Frame work of prophetic interpation
8. Most are 7 day creationist

So do tell me there is nothing that we don't agree with.
 
Upvote 0