• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

My take on eschatological positions?

tonychanyt

24/7 Christian
Oct 2, 2011
6,061
2,239
Toronto
Visit site
✟196,430.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What is my eschatological position: Premillennialism, Postmillennialism, Amillennialism, Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, Classical Dispensationalism, Progressive Dispensationalism, etc.?

For me, none of the above. I neither confirm nor deny any of these isms. When it comes to doctrine, I prefer to stick to the terms and phraseologies in the Bible. I rather not be labeled by any of these.

See also A Disciplined Probabilistic Approach to Biblical Hermeneutics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark Quayle

KevinT

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2021
859
459
57
Tennessee
✟61,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
It's the classic problem of "lumpers" vs "splitters". Using an "-ism" can sometimes save time. Like saying one is a "Christian" establishes many elements with one word. But it also lumps Protestants in with Orthodox Catholic believers. I understand that simply adopting a particular "-ism' often allows a person to hide behind a name and not properly inspect their beliefs. But sometimes, if one does think the entire issue through, there can be value in names of generalized concepts.

I realize you were specifically addressing eschatological terms, and not general Christianity. And also you were speaking only for yourself and what your personal stance is. But when I read this, it struck me as you being opposed to all the named "-isms" in general.

Best wishes,
KT
 
  • Winner
Reactions: tonychanyt
Upvote 0