Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I disagree with what your question implies, because what you just said implies that if you happen to have the word Catholic describe your faith, then the studies and (human) rational powers of the Catholics carry more authority wherever these (human) rational powers produce disagreement between Catholics and non-Catholics.Um, how is 'trusting in your own studies and rational powers' working out for all those who trust in their own studies and rational powers and end up disagreeing with others who trust their own studies and rational powers?
You might like the NRSV. It was compiled by multiple groups of Christian scholars from many denominations. According to Zondervan (a Bible publisher), the NRSV itself was "made by a committee of of men and women who are among the top scholars in America. They come from Protestant denominations, the Roman Catholic church, and the Greek Orthodox Church. The committee also includes a Jewish scholar."I don't use the Catholic Bible for the same reason I tend not to use other Bibles produced by only one group. IT is hard to get a balanced rendering if everyone on the team is skewed to a certain POV.
For me it would be really nice to have a non-Catholic Bible that includes cross-references and links that include the Deuterocanonical books. And a Catholic Bible to compare it with.When I read a Catholic Bible, I am assured that it contains the full canon of Holy Scripture as defined by ancient Church councils and definitively listed by the Councils of Florence and Trent, reaffirmed by the Second Vatican Council. If the Bible includes cross-references, then it will link passages between the Old Testament and the New Testament, including the Deuterocanonical books. If there are annotations provided by the Catholic Church or one of its faithful shepherds (a bishop), then I can trust in their reliability. However, these assurances are not present when I use a Jewish Tanakh or a Protestant Bible. For these reasons, I prefer a Catholic Bible over a Protestant or Jewish one.
IMO that regression into a Godless cultural mindset was the end result of the freedom of religion which came about to free Christians from the tyranny of (what had become) a tyrannical [Catholic] Church.Christianity has gone the same way as the model God provided for us in Biblical Israel. They started out strong, as a nation and vowing to be one. Over time there was compromise, division, and ultimately destruction, leaving only a small remnant of faithful devotees to God.
Christianity has gone the same route, although on a global level. European Civilization, which has largely carried the banner for Christian Civilization, has fallen back into primitive paganism, upheld by anti-supernatural philosophy, tolerating a plurality of moral expressions. No Church organization has been immune to this anti-religious influence and pressure to compromise. Anybody who says so is part of the problem.
Christianity has always required a spiritual revival of some sort, as well as a reformation of the impurities that have set in. Following judgment there has had to be repentance and recovery, followed by a continuation of the fundamental process that got us here.
For me it would be really nice to have a non-Catholic Bible that includes cross-references and links that include the Deuterocanonical books. And a Catholic Bible to compare it with.
I'm a Protestant who detests the fact that the so-called Apocrypha are excluded from our Bibles. I've seen things a number of times said both by Jesus and His apostles that I've seen in one of those books, almost word-for-word. I can't mention specifics now because I never made record of verses etc when I came across it. But I've seen it a number of times.I do agree with you there. He might be trying to make a point about how Bibles should not omit scriptures or entire books such as Sirach and other Catholic books. But hey, I use both Protestant and Catholic Bibles (online versions), and I love both versions.
Thank youThe Orthodox Study Bible is what you want. It’s 100% non-Catholic, assuming by Catholic you mean the denomination headed by the Bishop of Rome, and it provides the full Septuagint, which was the version of the Old Testament predominantly used by the Early Church, which accounts for most of the differences between the Roman Catholic canon and the canons of some Protestant churches
Otherwise, the closest you’re going to get is a full version of the KJV, or the NRSV with Apocrypha, but the NRSV is known for controversial translations. The KJV is probably the only real conservative alternative to the Orthodox Study Bible, but it does not cross-reference or link to the Apocrypha but rather tries to keep it separate, since those Anglican churches which still adhere to the 39 Articles of Religion (which do not include the Episcopal Church USA or the various Continuing Anglican churches) read those books but make a point of not using them as the source for any doctrine, but rather use them for moral instruction and edification.
Hey, thank you for including the Apocrypha/Septuagint/Deuterocanonical books.I'm a Protestant who detests the fact that the so-called Apocrypha are excluded from our Bibles. I've seen things a number of times said both by Jesus and His apostles that I've seen in one of those books, almost word-for-word. I can't mention specifics now because I never made record of verses etc when I came across it. But I've seen it a number of times.
No I'm non-denominational. Came from a partly not even sure if they were Lutheran or Catholic unbelieving family on the right and an unbelieving Methodist family on the left, and they were all neither left nor right, if you get my drift.Hey, thank you for including the Apocrypha/Septuagint/Deuterocanonical books.Are you Anglican, by any chance? Anglicans are the closest brethren to the Catholic church.
You are a cool guy brother. I am closer to the the political center as well, It is good that you are open to the other denominations. If you ever want to drop by a Catholic or Orthodox church, feel free. One can not take communion at those churches, until being confirmed though, but you are welcome to worship the Lord.No I'm non-denominational. Came from a partly not even sure if they were Lutheran or Catholic unbelieving family on the right and an unbelieving Methodist family on the left, and they were all neither left nor right, if you get my drift.
So I can go to any church I please and disagree silently as much as I please and agree out loud, so as to not bother the poor fella who has to tend the flock - and I do go to any church I please to go to.
Trying to carry 153 Bibles may not be helpful.
There are plenty of Catholic versions of the Bible translated by scholars from numerous religions. Realize that books have been removed from Protestant Bibles, and Catholics believe we are not to add or subtract from the Bible. And Protestant Bibles are translated with a Protestant slant, for example, the translation of Romans 2:6-7.I think you are too tied to Catholic authority. I understand that that is a "safe place" for you. But one does not have to be a "rebel" to make God Himself your primary authority and then trust in your own studies and rational powers to determine what is right for you. Just my opinion...
The Catholic Bible comes from the Hebrew Bible. At least most of the old testament does. People do not realize the Hebrew Bible was oral tradition long before they recorded the Bible.I prefer a Catholic Bible over a Protestant or Jewish one.
I own the OSB but haven't read 3 Maccabees yet.The Orthodox Study Bible is what you want. It’s 100% non-Catholic, assuming by Catholic you mean the denomination headed by the Bishop of Rome, and it provides the full Septuagint, which was the version of the Old Testament predominantly used by the Early Church, which accounts for most of the differences between the Roman Catholic canon and the canons of some Protestant churches
Otherwise, the closest you’re going to get is a full version of the KJV, or the NRSV with Apocrypha, but the NRSV is known for controversial translations. The KJV is probably the only real conservative alternative to the Orthodox Study Bible, but it does not cross-reference or link to the Apocrypha but rather tries to keep it separate, since those Anglican churches which still adhere to the 39 Articles of Religion (which do not include the Episcopal Church USA or the various Continuing Anglican churches) read those books but make a point of not using them as the source for any doctrine, but rather use them for moral instruction and edification.
I personally use The Jerusalem Bible and leave it at that. Even though I own many, many more.Trying to carry 153 Bibles may not be helpful.
I would say the overall Catholic population is growing throughout the world, but the number of priests and religious (monks and nuns) is shrinking. Thus, why many Churches are closed or merged together due to lack of leaders. Many monasteries have been forced to close due to lack of vocations.Protestant denominations are growing, Roman Catholic Churches are shrinking to the point of hundreds of them closing this year alone.
You said “When Catholics have good-faith disagreements, they typically do not divide the church into denominations”
Why then are hundreds of churches closing?
It's my understanding the UU no longer considers themselves to be Christian since their merge of Unitarians and Universalists in the 1960s. The Unitarian originally started out as a Christian movement that rejected the Holy Trinity. The modern UUs are a relatively small group (about 700,000 members worldwide).My suggestion - as a staff member - you should really read the forum rules about calling a group not Christian.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?