For those who ask for forgiveness that is fine. But what about those that don't? They get none. They suffer the consequences.
Ok, now, I fail to see the problem.
If I killed someone, and then I said
yep, I killed them, and I enjoyed it, do your worst and I receive their (The Justice Systems) worst punishment, then law and the justice system is at fault?
Better yet, if I said
And when I get out, I plan to kill again would they be at fault to do all within their power to prevent me from ever Getting Out ? Of course not.
The whole issue of forgiveness is the realization of wrong doing, with out this, one is then lead to believe they what they did was the correct thing to do. Not only have they done nothing wrong, but see no fault in doing it again.
So, if I break Gods laws, and follow in the path that this is the correct thing to do (IE: I do not seek Gods Forgiveness for my Actions), God would be at fault for not punishing me. Just as any judge, or law enforcement personal would.
But the cake is just way too tempting. And God new it will be. Remember he already knew before I was born I was going to eat the cake anyway.
Regardless of how tempting the cake is, or the fact that God knew, you did not know until you chose to eat it, and none of the other factors remove the fact that by eating the cake you did wrong.
I can't see how you can see it any other way. It is exactly what happens. We sin because that's our nature, not because it is easier.
We sin because it is easy and/or enjoyable.
We never Must sin.
To use an example: Every lie you tell, you must first formulate the lie, and then tell it. After which you enjoy the aftermath of what your lie has provided, finally ending with the perpetuating the lie.
Or to use the Cake: You first made the choice to eat it, then you picked it up, placed it in your mouth, and ate it. Enjoying the flavor and the full enjoyment of the cake at the time you were eating it. Possible even formulating a lie to tell to cover up that you ate the cake.
But all this is irrelevant.God put the snake pit there in the first place! He knew full well that person would play in it. He knew it before that person was even born. He knew that no matter what warnings he made that person would do it. This is the crux of the matter here and one of the main points I am trying to make.
Ok lets work here then. This is the Crux of the issue.
Every law is made with the knowledge of either two things. Someone has done this, or someone will do this. Every law, is based on the idea that someone will break this law. If no one would ever break this law, then the law would have no purpose to be made, and thus never exist.
So do we say, The Establishment of the Law has made me a Criminal it is the fault of the law that I am breaking it? Of course not.
But we do know, that if there was no Law, there would be no criminals, there would also be no order. Is this entrapment? Of course not.
Do we blame speeding limits for our speeding tickets, well some people would, but, are they wrong to do so? Yes they are, they knew the speeding limit was there, they knew freely they were breaking it, and they knew also there would be consequence for doing so (Why do you think everyone slows way down when they see a cop car), they realize their fault, but always when they get caught, they say this is wrong, or that speeding limits are stupid, or some such.
This is denial of any wrong doing, and that very same denial is what leads people to not to seek Gods forgiveness.
So just as we do not blame Law makers for the existence of Criminals, but praise them form making laws that protect us, the same should be held true for God.
Have I answered this Question or Consideration you have regarding this?
If he gives a warning, it is either a very weak warning - knowing it wouldn't have the desired effect or he simply did it so that he could say "I told you so" later. "I warned you about that, you didn't listen, you didn't ask for forgiveness, there fore you shall go to hell for it".
Just like Secular Laws are in Place, and enforced, so too is Gods Law. Both Lawmakers know that there will be those that will break the Laws and those that wont. Just like every Judge knows there are those that will see the error of their ways, and those that will not.
Have I provided you an answer or insight into this dilemma?
I can't fully grasp God either, but if we think things through logically, we can see major flaws in the way God supposedly works.
Like what for example, this is truly the grist of what you came here for, you have issues with how you have viewed God, and you seek answers.
I look forward to your questions, as always.
I can't really see how we can call God just and ominpotent at the same time. It clashes.
How so?
It all comes back to that argument that he knows all before it happens. He allows people to be born knowing full well they will reject him and then get sent to hell. If God did not know all that would happen, then yes it would be totally reasonable for God to warn us and then to punish us when we rejected him. I would agree with everything you say. But the bible says God is omiopent, he does know all, so there for any temptations he allows to come across our path he knew we would give into , so there for it is entrapment. Warnings are arbitrary.
So what you are saying is that an All Powerful god should remove our ability to think, and make choices based on logic or emotion, or remove or ability think beyond instinct, (or eliminate us completely) based simply on the fact that this god would not like what we will do?
Now, I would say that would be the actions of the a god that many people accuse the Christian God of being, a Despot, and ruthless overlord.
A god that would do You will do as I say and I know what you will do before you do it, so lets skip the whole shebang and Ill punish you right now.
I am at a loss that this strikes you as a Better Alternative?
I hope maybe I have given you some insight, but I do not believe I could answer a question here. I am sorry.
Anyway, I have the feeling now that we may be starting to frustrate each other. Perhaps it might be best if we accept a stalemate here. I don't think either of us will convince each other on this one.
A Stalemate is when either one person traps another, in such a way as to not be able to win, or where both players do not have sufficient resources to win.
If we are at a stalemate, which one are we at?
And I am not trying to Convince you, I am simply seeking to offer you an explanation to your questions.
If you chose to re-convert or not, is not part of this, this is simply an exchange of Ask and Answer and seek more knowledge.
I am almost sad that you view this as I am trying to Convert you, I am only trying to provide insight to the questions you came with, and hope and pray that you leave with answers.
God Bless
Key