So I have a very interesting situation and I really need some advice. After only 6 months of courting, my boyfriend sat down with my father to ask him for my hand in marriage. Now, my boyfriend is a great man. He is a hand-raising spirit-filled Christian who decided ever since the day he got saved (3 years ago), he wants to go into ministry and reach out to others and share how Christ changed his life forever. However currently, he is a salesmen and started a new job and is struggling to make ends meet and pay rent and pay off his debts from before he was saved. One of my fathers requirements for giving his blessing is that the man has to be able to support me financially and provide for me. This isn't unreasonable to me. My boyfriend explained that he was expecting to make a lot of money this next year in his new job, because at the time he was. He got my fathers blessing and we got engaged! However, sometime after the engagement, my parents learned that he was paying off debt and his job was not paying him due to complications in the companies payroll department. So my dad sat down with my finance to talk about finances. My fiancé was under a lot of pressure and made a huge mistake. He lied about his finances and broke my parents trust. My parents felt deceived. The guilt overwhelms him and he is willing to do whatever takes to earn back their trust. However, my parents are asking that we get unengaged, wait till he is financially stable, get his blessing again, and then get engaged again. However this is a huge deal. We don't believe we need their "permission" to be engaged. But we really want their blessing before we get married. We have not made any wedding plans, and we aren't going to until we make things right with them. No matter how long that takes. My fiancé is more than willing to ask for his blessing again. But do we really need to be unengaged? My parents just feel that being engaged implies we have their blessing which we don't anymore. Would I be completely unjustified in wanting to stay engaged and just wait however long it takes to win back their approval? My fiancé and I are in our mid and late twenties. We have our homes currently and live independently. But my parents are very conservative and traditional and believe we need their permission no matter what. I just don't know what to do. I will never get married without my parents blessing but I don't want to get unengaged. Any advice is appreciated!
If it were me, and I loved the person (which is a commitment you have to make, not just the "tinglies" you get in their presence) I would have to have some solid Biblical evidence aside from broad-brushing the command to "Honour your father and mother" as to why I would have to reject my spouse in some way, even temporarily. What I mean by this is that I would need something that's not subject to varying conditions or context, which honour is. The honour you have to give to individuals in your life varies upon the conditions of their relationship with you, with, ironically, the only exception being your husband (unless you take the failing road of divorce). For example, I have to honour my employer and do my job exactly how he instructs, when he instructs and where. This duty to him ends at the end of each work day and permanently when my employment is terminated. Likewise, we must honour our mother and father, but this honour varies at different stages of our life. in childhood, we must obey their commands and comprehensively respect their will for us (unless it diverges with God's
explicit will. As we mature and leave the care of our parents and become self-sustaining, we are no longer required to honour in terms of absolute obedience, but rather to extend a life-long love, affection, respect to their advice and gratefulness for supplying for us under their care.
When it comes to marriage, I certainly would not be letting my parents provide anything more than advice concerning my relationship, and you can be sure I would not heed a word of it unless they were admonishing me in a way that was morally obligatory for me to comply with. In such instances, however, I would truly be listening to God as He is the only source of moral values and duties.
So, the young man is sorry he lied, he even pleads guilty.
Then he should be forgiven.
Since you both live by your selves you can see how it goes as a couple, if your relation has potential for a good marriage.
Nobody can predict or assure the future.
You're both still young too.
Exactly. It is astounding how much pessimism there is in response to issues where someone mentions one sin, a
single sin a person has committed that has no relation to the integrity of their commitment to God or their spouse. Obviously all sin is horrible and to be corrected, but as human beings who belong to Christ talking among each other about how one sin not related to infidelity or evidence of a lack of marital commitment ought to make someone question their spouse is nothing more than a joke. I'm fairly certain that we all came to Christ with the hope that He wasn't going to look at us, His bride, that way. Thank God He is not as unforgiving and quick to condemn as some of us. If we are going to be severe about a sin, it should be immediately related to the foundation of the context. If someone wants to find employment at a financial institution, it makes sense to be severe about theft and fraud, but not about if they are out of shape or don't make the healthiest choices. In the same way, if someone wants to get married, the only
true fundamentals for a marriage are faithfulness and love, thus it would make sense to respond severely to someone who has evidence of infidelity or a lack of integrity in their marital commitment. No one could argue that finances aren't important, but recommending severe action against a man who is sincerely trying and occasionally fails is absurd.
If you love the man and he is godly and demonstrates the fruits of the Holy Spirit as evidence, then I would disregard your parents wishes and marry the man. Anyone will be able to tell you at any time that something isn't certain, but that will always be true in a literal sense. People, even Christian ones, get married to people all the time with their finances in order and their parents in concurrence, and it can still fail. Why? The reason is the same no matter the context: One or both did not love each other and retreated in selfishness. It's the cold hard truth but it's a fact. Selfishness is the exclusive force behind divorce (even when you divorce for adultery, which is morally acceptable, you still do so as a result of their oath-breaking selfishness), and if you love God and him, and he loves God and you, nothing will overcome you. Anything said to the contrary is nonsense. The man is trying according to your own proclamation, give him a break.