Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How do you know?You are necro posting again, AV. The user you quoted hasn't been online for 3 years...
Assumes facts not in evidence.Narcissistic necromancy.
Yup.Yeah I think you could only use inference to say God was the one who did it.
Even if He announed His presence and made a big show of it for everyone to witness it would only be good for a single generation. After that historical criticism would kick in and we'd all be reduced to primitive bumpkins.Yup.
And He didn't leave any physical evidence behind (as far as I know).
No ion trails, no plasma clouds; no time crystals; no nothing.
That's where faith comes in.Even if He announed His presence and made a big show of it for everyone to witness it would only be good for a single generation. After that historical criticism would kick in and we'd all be reduced to primitive bumpkins.
The night sky is always under observation, so it would be witnessed to pop into existence suddenly. Quantum physics, as I understand it, would not be able to account for an object of such mass. One would not be able to demonstrate a specific deity did it if they made an effort to avoid detection, but that the event wasn't natural would be measurable.God creates another moon -- ex nihilo -- orbiting the earth.
What evidence would you present that He did this?
What specific evidence would scientists expect to find surrounding this new moon?One would not be able to demonstrate a specific deity did it if they made an effort to avoid detection, but that the event wasn't natural would be measurable.
If it were natural we'd expect to be able to detect its approach long before it fell into orbit around the planet. If it shared the same orbit as the actual moon and never collided with it or disrupted it, it would most definitely have to be artificial in origin. If it consisted of non-natural materials, such as refined stainless steel, it'd have to be artificial as well. Even if it was a duplicate of the moon currently orbiting our planet, the low probability of such an identical object existing and suddenly being found near the planet would be a strong indicator of design.What specific evidence would scientists expect to find surrounding this new moon?
By virtue of its sudden appearance it would almost guaranteed have to be artificial. It'd have to drift towards our planet from outside the solar system with a clear, easily observable path to have a hope of passing as a naturally occurring object.A plasma cloud? an ion cloud? time crystals? residue radiation?
What exactly?
Okay … I stopped right here.If it were natural we'd expect to be able to detect its approach long before it fell into orbit around the planet.
Yes, which is why I assert that a new moon suddenly appearing in Earth's orbit with no clear origin would be obviously artificial.Okay … I stopped right here.
Do you know what "creatio ex nihilo" is?
Okay … which is it?Yes, which is why I assert that a new moon suddenly appearing in Earth's orbit with no clear origin would be obviously artificial.
PsychoSarah said:We wouldn't be able to rule out a method of travel unknown to us,
PsychoSarah said:… so it'd be impossible to tell that the mass itself wasn't a collection of pre-existing mass.
PsychoSarah said:That doesn't make it any less obviously artificial, though.
Yes, in your hypothetical scenario, it suddenly appeared, making it obviously artificial in some regard (the method by which it was transported, at a bare minimum).Okay … which is it?
Did it suddenly show up (as I stipulated in my OP)?
I'm not trying to make it look that way, only stating that for a created item the size of a moon to maintain the illusion of being natural, it couldn't just suddenly appear in Earth's orbit. Thus, by virtue of the fact that your hypothetical moon does suddenly appear, any conclusion that suggests it could have arrived naturally would only be held by wingnuts at most.Or did it travel here (as you're trying to make it look)?
![]()
I recently graduated; Biomedical sciences major with a chemistry minor. I've been a college student for nearly my entire presence on Christian forums, with only a brief month or two at the beginning as a high school graduate awaiting my first semester of college.Just out of curiosity, did you go to college?
I'm not trying to make it look that way, only stating that for a created item the size of a moon to maintain the illusion of being natural, it couldn't just suddenly appear in Earth's orbit. Thus, by virtue of the fact that your hypothetical moon does suddenly appear, any conclusion that suggests it could have arrived naturally would only be held by wingnuts at most.
PsychoSarah said:I recently graduated; Biomedical sciences major with a chemistry minor. I've been a college student for nearly my entire presence on Christian forums, with only a brief month or two at the beginning as a high school graduate awaiting my first semester of college.
I was respecting the OP; in order to show why such a thing would obviously not be a natural phenomenon, I had to compare it to a version that would fall in line with natural phenomena to most clearly depict how your hypothetical scenario deviated. You did, after all, ask how we'd be able to tell that it wasn't natural.Okay, Sarah … fair enough.
If you don't want to respect the OP, that's your prerogative.
I've mentioned that I am a college student many a time, including in threads you were participating in and direct conversation with you. I guess you forgot.Lucky guess on my part, eh?
God creates another moon -- ex nihilo -- orbiting the earth.
What evidence would you present that He did this?