Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Prior to the Scopes monkey trial and the public menace, Madalyn Murray O’hairs lawsuit, it wasThe trouble is that so many want it taught in the science class as well.
Prior to the Scopes monkey trial and the public menace, Madalyn Murray O’hairs lawsuit, it was
The trouble is that so many want it taught in the science class as well.
When the results came back, I'd probably proceed to lay a law suit on the examiner for being unfit to continue holding that position!
Is that welcomed?
.. for a while .. until sense making eventually over-rides parochialism ..I believe something to that effect happened in 1925.
History tends to repeat itself, does it not?
If you're talking about creationism, it has no place in science class.
Instead, it should be taught in history class.
Every jot and tittle.
The more people try to elaborate on the creation story, the more obviously mythical it seems.On the third day of the creation week, Earth consisted of one giant ball of seawater.
Let's call it Terra Aqua, for lack of a better term.
View attachment 361158
Then God commanded the atoms to get together and form land.
Then He commanded the waters to stand aside and let the land come to the surface.
View attachment 361159
Here's my question:
Are we expected to believe that that land consisted of millions and millions of years' worth of layers of fossils?
Including fossils of plants, which said plants weren't even created until later in the day?
I contend that God created only ONE LAYER, and calls that layer "Earth."
Not Hadean, Archean, Proterozoic, Paleozoic, Mesozoic, Cenozoic, or any other kind of "zoic".
"Earth"
What say you?
The more people try to elaborate on the creation story, the more obviously mythical it seems.
That doesn't seem to make any sense at all....the more cosmic evolution becomes clear, the less the creation events become literal, and the more faith would be required to believe it.
That doesn't seem to make any sense at all.
And I think that's by design.
I personally think God "jumbled up" the creation events, knowing that in the last days cosmic evolution would become the norm throughout academia.
In other words, the more cosmic evolution becomes clear, the less the creation events become literal, and the more faith would be required to believe it.
"Jumbled up"? What?
Remember my creation test I made up?
Here's one of the questions:
5. Put the following in order that they appeared in the universe: whales, stars, trees, sun, land, sea, outer space.
Academia teaches:
The Bible teaches:
- outer space
- stars
- sun
- land
- sea
- trees
- whales
Adam would, of course, have no idea what order God created them, as he wasn't around yet.
- outer space
- sea
- land
- trees
- sun
- stars
- whales
Yet he wrote the order as it is in the Bible.
Where did he get that information?
From God, of course.
And note how the two lists differ from one another.
Compared to academia's list, the Bible's list would appear "jumbled up," would it not?
So you just have slogans and sound bites.
Got it.
This is not a serious discussion. Why do you make these threads and then check out of them when pressed? Every time.Maybe if you had those slogans and sound bites too, you would understand what I mean when I say I think God "jumbled up" the order of His creation to make it stand out more in the end times?
You're literally making up your own reality and then gaslighting everyone who questions it. It's just not productive or valuable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?