Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
After about 10 shots of bourbon?
Trivia: When is only time you see Jesus standing at the right hand of God?
Psalm 14:3a They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy:After about 10 shots of bourbon?
Hey, don't blame me. You were the one that started that nonsense.Psalm 14:3a They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy:
So rather than appeal to authority via the REPORT button, you decided to take matters into your own hands: and that post is your way of rebuking a poster for not following the rules as you see them?Hey, don't blame me. You were the one that started that nonsense.
I know this is a Christian site but you should still know in which venues these sort of remarks of yours are appropriate.
I'm not faulting you for that.
Just don't tell me it's easy to understand and expect me to believe you.
It sounds like some people want their cake and eat it too.
So they claim they understand it, so as to add validity to their denial.
You post was not against the rules, there would be no reporting it. But common sense should tell you that what your post was an invitation for the reply that it got. If you want to make a case here you should try to do so with science. Trying to use the Bible as a weapon against others will only earn disrespect for the Bible itself. Technically what you did was not "blasphemy" but since you are courting a blasphemous reaction you should not be offended when you get one.So rather than appeal to authority via the REPORT button, you decided to take matters into your own hands: and that post is your way of rebuking a poster for not following the rules as you see them?
And, of course, you are entitled to your view of reality as you see it.In particular, I consider that to find a history imbedded in an object of a million years is evidence the object has been around a million years. A very simple deduction, with an obvious reason for making it.
I ask this:To recap, your post was not against the rules, but it was extremely hypocritical.
Trivia: When is only time you see Jesus standing at the right hand of God?
Actually, the -_- is context bound. Most often, it is an expression prefacing me explaining that a person's argument either doesn't make any sense, or in this case, when a person's argument actually goes against their position. Which I noticed is the part of my post you decided to ignore. I call it my "poker face" or "blank face". Neutral actually wouldn't make sense in how I use it, which is what that emoticon you posted represents.Sarah, I notice you use this a lot.
I think I've found an emoticon for that:
If you like it, it is {: neutral :} without the spaces or brackets.
Okay.Actually, the -_- is context bound. Most often, it is an expression prefacing me explaining that a person's argument either doesn't make any sense, or in this case, when a person's argument actually goes against their position. Which I noticed is the part of my post you decided to ignore. I call it my "poker face" or "blank face". Neutral actually wouldn't make sense in how I use it, which is what that emoticon you posted represents.
Yes, because it has nothing to do with the topic at hand and when your question was treated appropriately you reacted with false outrage. Technically what you did was goading, but you are probably safe here for breaking that rule.I ask this:
... and I get called 'extremely hypocritical'?
I'm glad I didn't ask:
Trivia: What is the only chapter in the Bible that ends in a comma?
And, of course, you are entitled to your view of reality as you see it.
Well, for the record, I've issued a request for thread closure.Yes, because it has nothing to do with the topic at hand and when your question was treated appropriately you reacted with false outrage. Technically what you did was goading, but you are probably safe here for breaking that rule.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?