Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
My FTS Challenge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jimmy D" data-source="post: 70415542" data-attributes="member: 366806"><p>Classic Creationist denial......</p><p></p><p>Schweitzer makes the extraordinary claim that she's found preserved soft tissue and you're all over it, imagining that it validates your ridiculous young Earth 'ideas'.</p><p></p><p>Schweitzer comes up with a scientifically sound idea about how they were preserved for millions of years and all of a sudden she doesn't know what she's talking about.</p><p></p><p>It would be quite sad if it wasn't so funny.</p><p></p><p>I wonder what experiments the authors of your ICR article have done to further their case and actually demonstrate their 'beliefs' about the age of Schweitzers samples? Anything? </p><p></p><p>The sum total of that ICR article is nitpicking Schweitzer and her teams' research (which passed peer review btw).</p><p></p><p>Why not read through these papers which outline the research in detail rather than swallowing that lazy propaganda?</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www4.ncsu.edu/~mhschwei/Research_files/annurev-earth-final-published_1.pdf" target="_blank">http://www4.ncsu.edu/~mhschwei/Research_files/annurev-earth-final-published_1.pdf</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1775/20132741" target="_blank">http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1775/20132741</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jimmy D, post: 70415542, member: 366806"] Classic Creationist denial...... Schweitzer makes the extraordinary claim that she's found preserved soft tissue and you're all over it, imagining that it validates your ridiculous young Earth 'ideas'. Schweitzer comes up with a scientifically sound idea about how they were preserved for millions of years and all of a sudden she doesn't know what she's talking about. It would be quite sad if it wasn't so funny. I wonder what experiments the authors of your ICR article have done to further their case and actually demonstrate their 'beliefs' about the age of Schweitzers samples? Anything? The sum total of that ICR article is nitpicking Schweitzer and her teams' research (which passed peer review btw). Why not read through these papers which outline the research in detail rather than swallowing that lazy propaganda? [URL]http://www4.ncsu.edu/~mhschwei/Research_files/annurev-earth-final-published_1.pdf[/URL] [URL]http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1775/20132741[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
My FTS Challenge
Top
Bottom