Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
you asked:Stop changing the subject and answer my question.
you asked:
"How can you have something that is identical to a watch, yet it can reproduce while a watch cannot?"
and i answered that its the same watch (without self replicating trait). just formed by a natural process. according to your critieria we cant call it a watch because it was formed by a natural process.
you ask me to provide definiton of a robot. so if will take wiki definition:Why do you ignore questions?
Please answer the questions in post 1130.
you ask me to provide definiton of a robot. so if will take wiki definition:
Robot - Wikipedia
"A robot is a machine—especially one programmable by a computer— capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically"
do you agree with this definition? if so: what if such a robot will evolve naturally? in this case you will not consider it as a robot since it evolved naturally. right?
Show me a robot that evolves naturally.
you asked:
"How can you have something that is identical to a watch, yet it can reproduce while a watch cannot?"
and i answered that its the same watch (without self replicating trait). just formed by a natural process. according to your critieria we cant call it a watch because it was formed by a natural process.
a penguin?Show me a robot that evolves naturally.
And, what about the second question?
If the two are physically identical, then you can not have one evolving while the other does not.
Weas refer to electro-mechanical robots. A penguin is not an electro mechanical robot.a penguin?
as for your second question: i dont think that we can falsify the existence of god. but we can prove it. on the other hand: we also cant falsify evolution.
That's correct. The existence of God is unfalsifiable...a penguin?
as for your second question: i dont think that we can falsify the existence of god...
Let's see you do it.but we can prove it.
Maybe you can't, but those who actually undersand how evolution works know very well what it would take to falsify evolution.on the other hand: we also cant falsify evolution.
It doesn't matter whether they were were made by hand one at a time (as early Ferarri cars were made) or on a factory production line. They will only be Ferrari cars if they were manufactured by Ferarri N. V.why not? if someone will make a ferarri by hand work and one will make it in a factory: they will not be a ferarri cars?
Let's see you do it.
Maybe you can't, but those who actually undersand how evolution works know very well what it would take to falsify evolution.
You haven't even told us which god you are trying to prove the existence of.i already did in this thread. if you dont think that a robot prove a designer then i cant think i can prove to you the existence of god.
When we refer to robots we mean electro-mechanical, non-living devices.i already did in this thread. if you dont think that a robot prove a designer then i cant think i can prove to you the existence of god.
When we refer to robots we mean electro-mechanical, non-living devices.
A robot can be made with wood and leather parts. This does not make it a living thing.a robot can be made from organic components too. so this notion is incorrect.
Looks like you are the victim of a group interrogation. A form of harassment IMO. Perhaps we could see if the mods concur. Consequence free internet bullying on a Christian Forum.you ask me to provide definiton of a robot. so if will take wiki definition:
Robot - Wikipedia
"A robot is a machine—especially one programmable by a computer— capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically"
do you agree with this definition? if so: what if such a robot will evolve naturally? in this case you will not consider it as a robot since it evolved naturally. right?
a penguin?
why not? if someone will make a ferarri by hand work and one will make it in a factory: they will not be a ferarri cars?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?