Darwinism is rejected based on scientific evidence. The "God could have done it this way" line, or the "this is not a threat to theism" line is complete rhetoric. You will not get an inch or a mile. Seeking a line of cooperation with the opposition to suppress scrutiny is not a viable route either. You will defend your position. Darwinism is atheism. The idea that chance can assemble a human is not new. From the first time you see any structure at any point in time, it is either chance or intelligent design. And man has been around long before Darwin's day. So has the passivity of chance. You attempt to cloak it, to coat it with sugar and spices, and serve it with-in salts, but it is that same archaic chance, and will be treated as such.
Darwinism feeds on its own concept of the past, it has constructed, and Darwinists will follow in its wake. A past where bacteria men who began, could not understand the weather, could not understand life, and based on that, you think you're in a bulldozer. But when you stream here from your secular forums, after your mod's speech, and the head count for the day is given, it is what he forgot to tell you, it is what you don't know, that will bleed you. You have the scientific evidence for man's creation piling up, but at the same time, your mind cannot comprehend this, as to your understanding, science should be "debunking religion", as you presume it has done in the past. Your understanding of man's beginning is not universal. And man was created as man. This is where, at this point, direct influence from the universal consciousness always was. This is the only place the purely non physical, had its influence on the physical. And we were waiting for you.
Thank you for making my point. 
