My DNA Challenge

[AV1611VET]

Again, if you knew how DNA worked then you wouldn't say this, we could literally have 100% different DNA and still be functionally identical to another organism that looked and acted identical.

Missed this, did you?

My Snowman Challenge II

So, in light of the evidence, I have to say if your God is real, and he created us specially and independently, he's intentionally misleading us to think Evolution is real.

If God wanted to intentionally mislead you, you wouldn't know it.

I don't call it "intentionally misleading" when He documented what He did, when He did it, where He did it, how He did it, what order He did it in, how long it took Him to do it, why it took Him that long, and who the eyewitnesses were, including some of their names.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Hello friend.

How does this insignificance benefit you?

It doesn't. Doesn't hurt me either.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Missed this, did you?

My Snowman Challenge II

Snowmen have DNA?

If God wanted to intentionally mislead you, you wouldn't know it.

I don't call it "intentionally misleading" when He documented what He did, when He did it, where He did it, how He did it, what order He did it in, how long it took Him to do it, why it took Him that long, and who the eyewitnesses were, including some of their names.

If God wanted to intentionally mislead you, would you know it?

 

[Bugeyedcreepy]

Missed this, did you?

My Snowman Challenge II

nope, didn't miss it.

If God wanted to intentionally mislead you, you wouldn't know it.

I don't call it "intentionally misleading" when He documented what He did, when He did it, where He did it, how He did it, what order He did it in, how long it took Him to do it, why it took Him that long, and who the eyewitnesses were, including some of their names.

It is "intentionally misleading" if his creation completely falsifies everything that unknown authors claiming to speak for your God wrote down several thousand years ago.

If God wanted to intentionally mislead you, would you know it?

It's plainly obvious he's been misled and his God doesn't care that we all know it...

 

[AV1611VET]

nope, didn't miss it.

Just testing me then, were you?

 

[Bugeyedcreepy]

Just testing me then, were you?

lol! No, it's a complete non-sequitur.

 

[TLK Valentine]

nope, didn't miss it.

It is "intentionally misleading" if his creation completely falsifies everything that unknown authors claiming to speak for your God wrote down several thousand years ago.

It's plainly obvious he's been misled and his God doesn't care that we all know it...

Perhaps God intends to use him as an object lesson...

 

[Divide]

Oh yeah, I want a text source that details his views to review, since doing it with videos is extra time consuming and makes me more prone to errors.

Oh yeah. I do not know if text is available, but I can check.
I'm on it.

 

[Divide]

Except Jesus explicitly states in the NT that he is NOT removing or changing any of the old laws.

That's true, I remember reading that. But I got the impression that it wasn't specifically about all the old rabbinical laws, because there were more than 600 of them. It was also stated in the NT, that , the commandments can be all summed up into two. Love the Lord God with all your heart, soul and mind...and to love our Brothers as our self.
So I don't think that...I need a prayer shawl, or have to count my steps on the Sabbath and all that.

Make sense?

 

[HitchSlap]

I know how you feel.

An atheist would never selectively notice or focus upon evidence which tends to support the things they already believe or want to be true while ignoring that evidence which would serve to disconfirm those beliefs or ideas.

Are you sure about this?

 

[HitchSlap]

Tell me how a person goes from Christian to atheist.

Rather than ignore all the doubts and questions, I attempted to gain a comprehensive understanding of religion and the power of belief, applied the 'outsider's test,' and eventually realized I was atheist.

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

Are you sure about this?

Hey slappy. Its sarcasm my dear

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

I'm not sure what kind of nihilist you think I am but no, I dont agree.

Hello my new friend

What kind of nihilist are you?

Cheers

 

[VirOptimus]

Hello my new friend

What kind of nihilist are you?

Cheers

Value-nihilist, I deny the existance of metaphysics.

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

Value-nihilist, I deny the existance of metaphysics.

Hey hey

Would you say that stealing from someone, for whatever reason, is neither inherently right nor inherently wrong?

Cheers 'he who feels concern or interest; attachs importance to something.'

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

It doesn't. Doesn't hurt me either.

Hey psychopathic noblewoman

"Nothing more humbling though than being an insignificant, transient speck on a water covered rock that has no ultimate purpose, though"

Good - to be desired or approved of.

So this attitude - too small or unimportant to be worth consideration - is a desired way of thinking?

Cheers

 

[Bugeyedcreepy]

So this attitude - too small or unimportant to be worth consideration - is a desired way of thinking?

It isn't a desired way of thinking. This is just observed reality, no matter how we feel about it...

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

It isn't a desired way of thinking. This is just observed reality, no matter how we feel about it...

Hey hey bugs.

Thank you for your reply. We got too much to talk about as it is.

Please excuse me. You reply is the equivalent to me saying to you 'it is because it is'.

 

[VirOptimus]

Hey hey

Would you say that stealing from someone, for whatever reason, is neither inherently right nor inherently wrong?

Cheers 'he who feels concern or interest; attachs importance to something.'

There are no rights/wrong/good/evil. Only opinions.

 

[AV1611VET]

There are no rights/wrong/good/evil.

Well that should insure every child aces their math tests, no matter what they put down as an answer.

0/0=1