My counter-daisy-chain challenge

[pgp_protector]

Coming from you ... yes.

Remember hinting that I was using a bot ( 2 )?

Actually I was trying to write a counting bot at that time, I mess around a lot with software development, and was even able to test it out a bit while I was a site supporter.

Remember those disgusting pics you put in my VM box?
I had to appeal to admin to get them removed.

Disgusting pics? No idea, or are you referring to the zombie threads mimes?

And now this?

Were your actions a witness for Christ?

I doubt it.

 

[Chris B]

Am I being a witness for Christ when I claim a literal Genesis 1?

On a forum where believing in a jot or tittle of the Bible is considered "intellectually dishonest," I guess I'm a lousy witness, eh?

From my perspective that would indeed be poor witness.
If it is a thing not necessary to salvation, then if some might balk or stumble at it, then it's an unnecessary obstacle to the gospel to insist on it, surely?

That's apart from the issue of whether a literal Genesis 1 is defensible.
Having considered the matter I wouldn't like to defend it.

Chris

 

[RealityCheck01]

Far be it from me to break my own mold, eh?

If your mold is to make ignorant demands, AV1611VET, then feel free to ignorantly demand !
AV1611VET: The ignorance inherent in your demand (either of the real world or of evolution)

 

[RealityCheck01]

Am I being a witness for Christ when I claim a literal Genesis 1?

No, AV1611VET - you are just not living in this universe where a literal Genesis 1 is wrong. Wrong dates if you are foolish enough to calculate them. Wrong order of events.
Genesis 1 has the order of physical events in the Earth's history wrong !

Your religious beliefs are another matter and for another section of the forum - this is Discussion and Debate > Physical & Life Sciences.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, AV1611VET - you are just not living in this universe where a literal Genesis 1 is wrong.

Why then does my location say: Earth One?

 

[RealityCheck01]

Why then does my location say: Earth One?

"Earth One" is fictional which may be appropriate .
The name of this planet is Earth. This Earth that has an scientifically established history that contradicts Genesis 1 does exist, AV1611VET?
Genesis 1 has the order of physical events in the Earth's history wrong !

 

[AV1611VET]

"Earth One" is fictional which may be appropriate .

Earth One speaks of a very well-defined basic doctrine in the Christian faith.

And you can't even see it, can you?

 

[RealityCheck01]

Earth One speaks of a very well-defined basic doctrine in the Christian faith.

I did not bother to go beyond the already fictional nature of "Earth One" to a religious doctrine of an "Earth One".
That does not address the basic point about the real Earth that you are still ignoring AV1611VET:

The name of this planet is Earth. This Earth that has an scientifically established history that contradicts Genesis 1 does exist, AV1611VET?
Genesis 1 has the order of physical events in the Earth's history wrong !

P.S. Maybe you should look at the name of this section of the forum - it is not Religious Doctrine !
ETA: I would like a link to this "very well-defined basic doctrine". Searching so far only gets this
It is this Superman: Earth One – Christian Allegory for a New Audience .

There is a "very well-defined basic doctrine" called The New Earth.

 

[AV1611VET]

ETA: I would like a link to this "very well-defined basic doctrine".

Sure thing.

Here you go:

There is a "very well-defined basic doctrine" called The New Earth.

 

[RealityCheck01]

Here you go:

Thanks, AV1611VET.
So back to Physical & Life Sciences where
AV1611VET: The ignorance inherent in the OP demand (either of the real world or of evolution) signals the end of the thread.

Unless you want to go onto:
Genesis 1 has the order of physical events in the Earth's history wrong !

 

[Strathos]

And after 5 pages, AV has still not attempted to produce the genealogy that was asked of him.