- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,999
- 52,622
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The event, no. The theory, yes.
Great to see you back here again, you've been missed!
We are completely ignorant of of any conditions before the big expansion.
Our cosmos might just be one drop of matter in the midst of a sneeze by God.
God might have been hosting guests from the community as well.
In spite of what some poetic scientists are saying about nothingness being unstable, I think it must have been amazingly serene before the big bang.
From a certain point of view perhaps the expansion itself is peaceful and serene. On a slow enough timescale the whole Universe is slowly opening up, brightly glowing at first then darkening to black covered in whirling patterns of sparkles before finally fading to an even matt black.In spite of what some poetic scientists are saying about nothingness being unstable, I think it must have been amazingly serene before the big bang.
From a certain point of view perhaps the expansion itself is peaceful and serene. On a slow enough timescale the whole Universe is slowly opening up, brightly glowing at first then darkening to black covered in whirling patterns of sparkles before finally fading to an even matt black.
Would a woman want that to happen to her diamond ring?
How about the eggs in your refrigerator suddenly expand and "open up" all over everywhere?
Blooming Flowers Time Lapse
That honestly would be very interesting to know too. Just to see what the universe would be like before the Big Bang. I imagine... very quiet. Like the sort of quiet where you can hear your own heartbeat.
Can the Big Bang Theory be considered a natural disaster on a universal scale?
It's considered natural because - as described - it conforms to natural laws, i.e. the laws of physics.What definition of natural fits the Big Bang? It is natural in the sense all of nature is the result. But, is it natural in the sense of conforming to the usual order of nature or natural in the sense of produced by nature? How could we know either of the latter since, from our perspective, the Big Bang is without precedent? Maybe the James Webb telescope will give us more clues.
It is possible, though in a massive magnitude of 1 to the power of several million billion to 1.
That honestly would be very interesting to know too. Just to see what the universe would be like before the Big Bang. I imagine... very quiet. Like the sort of quiet where you can hear your own heartbeat.
It's considered natural because - as described - it conforms to natural laws, i.e. the laws of physics.
Sounds just a bit like confirmation bias. Just saying...It's considered natural because - as described - it conforms to natural laws, i.e. the laws of physics.
I like that. But then, from God's point of view, is not this whole universe, even 'the omni', still but a singularity?From a certain point of view perhaps the expansion itself is peaceful and serene. On a slow enough timescale the whole Universe is slowly opening up, brightly glowing at first then darkening to black covered in whirling patterns of sparkles before finally fading to an even matt black.
I like that. But then, from God's point of view, is not this whole universe, even 'the omni', still but a singularity?
Meh, I'll take time and eventual death instead of a timelessness primordial state where ultimately nothing matters because nothing changes.Isn't it the Singularity that destroyed the Primordial Atom's state of existence?
Had the Singularity not occurred, we wouldn't be on our way to heat death.
Not sure, but if you take the perspective of time as another dimension of the Universe it's ultimately already complete, beginning to end, all at once and time is just a perspective.I like that. But then, from God's point of view, is not this whole universe, even 'the omni', still but a singularity?
Meh, I'll take time and eventual death instead of a timelessness primordial state where ultimately nothing matters because nothing changes.
It's considered natural because - as described - it conforms to natural laws, i.e. the laws of physics.
If the BB was responsible for the life on earth and the ultimate violence and poverty then I would say it was a disaster.Can the Big Bang Theory be considered a natural disaster on a universal scale?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?