- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,210
- 52,660
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Umm...Harry Potter?
.It seems pretty reasonable to refer to rogue terrorist nations as Satan. I don't know that they really could have picked a better two as their examples.
Isaiah 5:20 said:Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
I just feel as though a country that harbors known terrorists and provides weapons to terrorists should be considered a rogue terrorist state. I understand that you support terrorism. I don't.
Ya --- Muhammad tried that with the Bible too --- and it didn't work.
He taught that God had a threefold plan of redemption for all of mankind:
Only when it came to implementing Step Three, those who knew their Bibles [correctly] accused him of being a false prophet instead.
- Step One = Moses = convert humanity to Judaism.
- Step Two = Jesus = convert Jews to Christianity.
- Step Three = Muhammad himself = convert Christians to Islam.
This infuriated him, and the man who once embraced Christianity now became one of its biggest adversaries.
Why do you think they call us the Great Satan today?
Muhammed never "embraced" Christianity. What have you been smoking?
Wikipedia said:According to Welch, the Qur'anic verses at this time were not "based on a dogmatic conception of monotheism but on a strong general moral and religious appeal". Its key themes include the moral responsibility of man towards his creator; the resurrection of dead, God's final judgment followed by vivid descriptions of the tortures in hell and pleasures in Paradise...
He didn't, huh? What are these?
Cabal nailed it right out of the gate.I'm not sure how we could give a scientific answer to mysticism.
You could start by descibing environments, locations, recording vitals, and objective behavior during/involving mystic or religious experiences.Cabal nailed it right out of the gate.
Oh, my -- I'll try.You could start by descibing environments, locations, recording vitals, and objective behavior during/involving mystic or religious experiences.
You walk [objective behavior] into a room [location] with a table and a box sitting on top of the table.[environment] The box is 1 cubic foot in size and shape, and has no bottom. [vitals]
I lift the box straight up to show you there is nothing on the table, then I put the box back down. [objective behavior]
When I lift the box up a second time, there sits an apple on the table. [objective behavior, [[changed]] environment]
Question: Assuming this was an actual act of ex nihilo creation, what would be different than if I would have used sleight-of-hand to produce the apple? [specific question]
I'm looking for a specific scientific answer. [objective request]
I'm sorry, I was referring to the mysticism tidbit, not this silly apple nonsense.Oh, my -- I'll try.
I'm not sure what good that will do, but for what it's worth:
The devil is in the details. And you are not interested in genuine answers. Only the answer you think is correct.Cute --- but like I said --- please don't make this any harder than it is.
Good -- I'll pass on answering then.I'm sorry, I was referring to the mysticism tidbit, not this silly apple nonsense.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?