- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,194
- 52,655
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If I'm right, you're right.If it was created there must have been a creator, so it wasn´t created ex nihilo. Ex nihilo creation is an oxymoron.
Whatever - since the premise of your question is that you were right there is no way to prove that you would be wrong.
Your point being?
If I'm right, you're right.
Creatio ex nihilo does not generate evidence.
Right about what? that creatio ex nihilo occurred?So, because there is no evidence for your claims, then you must be right. Correct?
The more the better.What if there is contradictory evidence?
...snip....
You may not respect my science, but surely you respect my faith?
...snip...
Suit yourself.Respect your faith?? No.
Suit yourself.
I'd be right if I believed it, whether there was evidence or not.
And for the record, the more evidence against it, the greater my faith.
Isn't faith described as 'believing something, even when all evidence says otherwise'?
I have nothing to add to this statement.The more the better.
Let's see it, so I can handwave it away on principle.
Are you finally admitting that we do not have "faith" in evolution?Isn't faith described as 'believing something, even when all evidence says otherwise'?
I'm out to lunch on that.Are you finally admitting that we do not have "faith" in evolution?
Ah yes, the Rorschach test story. I knew what you were referencing before I saw it. But seriously, what is the difference between your definition of "faith," and the common definition of insanity?I wouldn't doubt it -- 588
I'm out to lunch on that.
Some like to say it takes more faith to believe in evolution (or that God doesn't exist), than it does not to believe.
Personally, I think that's a cheap shot that doesn't warrant reducing to a mantra.
I think [most of] you guys really see things and believe it, but in my opinion, you're all brainwashed by higher academia.
And that's just my opinion.
Who knows?But seriously, what is the difference between your definition of "faith," and the common definition of insanity?
...would not generate evidence. (fixed that for you)Creatio ex nihilo does not generate evidence.
Isn't faith described as 'believing something, even when all evidence says otherwise'?
* Bumped for 2011 *
Thank you for your contribution.This may be the most worthless thread I've ever read, and I've read some Chan threads. Wow.
Now thank me for my contribution.
You mean it died at one point!?
What you missed the funeral!You mean it died at one point!?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?