My Accuracy Challenge

[AV1611VET]

And science is what makes a pregnancy more likely to result in a healthy baby, isn't it?

Again ... assuming science doesn't remove it first.

 

[Dizredux]

Again ... assuming science doesn't remove it first.

I hate to break it to you but there were abortions long before science. According to Wiki records of this date back to 1075 BCE.

Dizredux

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

You forgot one: intelligent yesterday-ism

It states that a 7-headed dragon created the universe as-is yesterday with all our memories implanted.

KJV Search Results for "dragon"
"dragon"
occurs 19 times in 18 verses in the KJV.

Rev 12:
3 And there was seen another sign in the heaven, and behold!
a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns,
and upon his head seven diadems,
13 And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the land,
he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.

Dragonslayer (Theatrical Trailer) - YouTube


.

 

[AV1611VET]

I hate to break it to you but there were abortions long before science.

So?

Thanks to science though, they are removing "fetal tissue" ... not a "child."

Science gives us creatures comforts at the expense of moral decay.

In other words, science is dragging this country down morally.

 

[bhsmte]

So?

Thanks to science though, they are removing "fetal tissue" ... not a "child."

Science gives us creatures comforts at the expense of moral decay.

In other words, science is dragging this country down morally.

Keep spinning the wheels AV.

 

[Dizredux]

So?

Thanks to science though, they are removing "fetal tissue" ... not a "child."

I think you are talking about medicine and not science, not to mention politics and social forces.

Science gives us creatures comforts at the expense of moral decay.

I would like to see you back this up in a reality based manner. It might prove to be interesting.

In other words, science is dragging this country down morally.

Oh I think there are a number of things that could be considered dragging the country down. One major one in my opinion is trying to cripple our educational system by attempting to replace science with creationism.

Dizredux

 

[Kylie]

So?

Thanks to science though, they are removing "fetal tissue" ... not a "child."

Science gives us creatures comforts at the expense of moral decay.

In other words, science is dragging this country down morally.

Well, why don't you stop using anything that science gives you?

 

[Kylie]

Again ... assuming science doesn't remove it first.

Oh, yak yak yak, changing the subject. Don't you have anything better to do?

 

[RickG]

Oh, yak yak yak, changing the subject. Don't you have anything better to do?

Of course he doesn't. It's all about the post count.

 

[AV1611VET]

Well, why don't you stop using anything that science gives you?

When you guys stop using anything that God gave you -- first.

 

[AV1611VET]

Oh, yak yak yak, changing the subject.

To science?

Don't you have anything better to do?

No

 

[AV1611VET]

Of course he doesn't. It's all about the post count.

I wouldn't talk > Posts: 3,808

 

[biggles53]

So?

Thanks to science though, they are removing "fetal tissue" ... not a "child."

Science gives us creatures comforts at the expense of moral decay.

In other words, science is dragging this country down morally.

You do realise, don't you, that abortion rates are FALLING, and have been for decades....?

Or would that just ruin a good fearmongering story...?

 

[Kylie]

To science?

That's such a broad topic you can still be talking about it while derailing the thread. So be a good boy, will you?

No

I'm not surprised. Why don't you go and learn something? You've got the wealth of human knowledge at your fingertips. Go and take advantage of it.

 

[Kylie]

When you guys stop using anything that God gave you -- first.

Prove to me that God gave me anything and I'll stop.

I, of course, can easily prove to you that science gave you lots of things.

 

[Kylie]

I wouldn't talk > Posts: 3,808

So what? Quantity is irrelevant. Quality is what counts. And given that the majority of your posts are you demonstrating that you know how to add 1 to a number, I'd say the average quality of your posts is very very low.

How many posts do you have not including the counting threads, AV?

 

[AV1611VET]

Why don't you go and learn something?

Oh, the irony of that request.

 

[AV1611VET]

Well, why don't you stop using anything that science gives you?

When you guys stop using anything that God gave you -- first.

Prove to me that God gave me anything and I'll stop.

Until I do, and you do stop, okay with you if I go ahead and keep using anything that science gives me?

 

[Kylie]

Until I do, and you do stop, okay with you if I go ahead and keep using anything that science gives me?

In other words, you want to do nothing and keep hypocritically using the fruits of the science you don't agree with.

Aren't you just lovely.

 

[AV1611VET]

Of course he doesn't. It's all about the post count.

I wouldn't talk > Posts: 3,808

So what? Quantity is irrelevant.

LOL -- solid aurum.

Rick, I guess she told you, didn't she?

Quality is what counts. And given that the majority of your posts are you demonstrating that you know how to add 1 to a number,

Not even that.

I don't have to know how to add.

All I have to do is match the number to the number that the software assigns to the post.

... I'd say the average quality of your posts is very very low.

I can see you're not into occupational therapy, are you?

How many posts do you have not including the counting threads, AV?

I'll take a wild guess and say 100,000.

Of those 100,000, most are repetitions themselves -- like my numbers.

From there, filter out the QVs, the challenges, and the times I've begged for answers, and I would say what is left is Scripture, solid doctrine, and pet theories.