My Abiogenesis Challenge

[miknik5]

Nope, it is the one correct answer. Why do you think it is wrong? I will explain to you why it is right.

You wouldn't answer my simple question so maybe you can enlighten me what your problem with my post is?

disrespect for what you do not understand

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

It doesn't mention the Geneva Bible either, or the Gothic, or the Wycliffe.

What's your point?

My point is that Psalm 12 is not, contrary to your statement, about the King James Version in particular. Of course, its not about the Geneva Bible or the Gothic or the Wycliffe . . . its just about THE BIBLE.

 

[Skreeper]

disrespect for what you do not understand

Stop being so cryptic. What am I not understanding? And why don't you explain it to me?

 

[miknik5]

Stop being so cryptic. What am I not understanding? And why don't you explain it to me?

No

 

[lesliedellow]

Riddle me this:

What is the only man-made thing in Heaven?

Has it escaped your notice that Revelation is thick with exotic symbolism, which is hardly intended to be read literally, and that the Temple containing the said article was destroyed in 587BC?

 

[miknik5]

Has it escaped your notice that Revelation is thick with exotic symbolism, which is hardly intended to be read literally, and that the Temple containing the said article was destroyed in 587BC?

Has it ever occurred to you that what might be hidden to some is revealed plainly to others?

 

[lesliedellow]

Has it ever occurred to you that what might be hidden to some is revealed plainly to others?

Down the centuries there have been no shortage of loony toons who have thought they understood Revelation perfectly. Harold Camping being a recent example.

I am sure AV will catch the point, even if you don't.

 

[Subduction Zone]

disrespect for what you do not understand

No, none at all. And what makes you think that we do not understand? The disrespect did not start with us. AV asked a disrespectful question.

 

[AV1611VET]

I am sure AV will catch the point, even if you don't.

If anyone can read Revelation 8 and still deny catastrophism, then I submit their allegorizing of that chapter would make Harold Camping's interpretation of the entire book of Revelation look like a science paper.

 

[lesliedellow]

If anyone can read Revelation 8 and still deny catastrophism, then I submit their allegorizing of that chapter would make Harold Camping's interpretation of the entire book of Revelation look like a science paper.

What has Rev 8 got do with a mention of the Ark in chapter 11, which is presumably what your "riddle" was alluding to?

 

[AV1611VET]

What has Rev 8 got do with a mention of the Ark in chapter 11, which is presumably what your "riddle" was alluding to?

-- Huh?

 

[lesliedellow]

-- Huh?

#497, in case you have forgotten.

 

[AV1611VET]

#497, in case you have forgotten.

The answer to my riddle is the nail scars on Jesus' hands and feet -- not Noah's Ark.

And 'Chapter 11' of what?

 

[lesliedellow]

The answer to my riddle is the nail scars on Jesus' hands and feet -- not Noah's Ark.

And 'Chapter 11' of what?

The Ark referred to in Rev 11 is the Ark of the Covenant, not Noah's Ark.

 

[miknik5]

No, none at all. And what makes you think that we do not understand? The disrespect did not start with us. AV asked a disrespectful question.

my post was directed specifically and only to Skreeper

 

[miknik5]

Down the centuries there have been no shortage of loony toons who have thought they understood Revelation perfectly. Harold Camping being a recent example.

I am sure AV will catch the point, even if you don't.

No one knows the hour.


Let's leave it at that
I'm sure AV will catch the point even if Harold Camping or LeslieDellow don't

 

[Skreeper]

my post was directed specifically and only to Skreeper

I wonder why you visit the Discussion and Debate forum when you do not wish to discuss or debate.

 

[miknik5]

I wonder why you visit the Discussion and Debate forum when you do not wish to discuss or debate.

You had a preconceived terrible notion already

I am free to choose who i wish to discuss with

 

[bhsmte]

The fact that you are still talking about nothing is a reality that it is you who are behaving childish

Let's move on here

I told you to ignore the silliness
That would be more adultlike

I thought so, you have nothing to support your claim. And you are claiming others need to act like adults....LOL

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Hi

An apology is in order
You could have just really done your HW

How difficult would it have been to just google parallel versions of the same scripture verse?
Or just typing in "and GOD hovered"?

Actually, you know what bungle bear, I don't really need one

Why should I apologise? AV is the one saying you've got it wrong. I responded to your version then had AV trying to tell me that's not what the bible says.

I look forward to seeing you ask AV for an apology.