• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Murtha's Second Act

Yusuf Evans

Well-Known Member
Aug 17, 2005
10,057
611
Iraq
✟13,443.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
JoshuaW said:
Murtha speaks for the soldiers. If you respect them, respect his words.

He also said the Haditha massacre investigation was conclude when it wasn't. He played the guilty till innocent card already,and that tells me exactly who he speaks for and it ain't us Marines either.
 
Upvote 0

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟101,609.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
KalEl76 said:
He also said the Haditha massacre investigation was conclude when it wasn't. He played the guilty till innocent card already,and that tells me exactly who he speaks for and it ain't us Marines either.
In 2004, Murtha also claimed that he knew from conversations with Pentagon officials that after the 2004 elections, Bush had secret plans to call up massive numbers Of the Individual Ready reserve. It never happened. Seems like Murtha's Pentagon sources are not what we would refer to as reliable
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,481
✟214,455.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
MachZer0 said:
In 2004, Murtha also claimed that he knew from conversations with Pentagon officials that after the 2004 elections, Bush had secret plans to call up massive numbers Of the Individual Ready reserve. It never happened. Seems like Murtha's Pentagon sources are not what we would refer to as reliable
Have a link for the Murtha statement about the Individual Ready reserve?
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,481
✟214,455.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
MachZer0 said:
Thanks for the link.
your link said:
Kerry spokesman David Wade said the four-term Massachusetts senator got his information on Bush's mobilization plans from Representative John Murtha of Pennsylvania

On 30 June 2004 the Army announced plans to order 5,600 Soldier in the Individual Ready Reserve to active duty for possible deployment with the next Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom rotations. Those Soldiers called up will have 30 days from the date the orders were issued to take care of personal business before having to report to a mobilization site, officials said. The orders call for 18 months of active duty, but that could be extended for a total of 24 months if needed, they said. The IRR call-up does not impact retired Soldiers, contrary to several civilian media reports.
link

In late June, the Army announced it would call up more than 5,600 members of the Individual Ready Reserve, which is made up of soldiers who were honorably discharged after completing their active-duty Army tours, usually a stint of four years or more. But soldiers make a minimum eight-year commitment when they volunteer for the Army, and the Army has the right to call them back until that time is up. The last time the Army called up significant numbers from the IRR was during the Persian Gulf War in 1991.
link

Does this mean that the Army also got their intel from Murtha?
 
Upvote 0

Voegelin

Reactionary
Aug 18, 2003
20,145
1,430
Connecticut
✟26,726.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
MachZer0 said:
I understand that Murtha's military record is unclear since he, just like Kerry, has refused to sign to release his records.

I was unaware of that. His current actions are those of a ticket puncher but I've seen nothing to indicate he was such when he served. Perhaps he was a Lt. John Kerry sort from the git-go. That he hasn't signed a release is troubling. We'll find out eventually. Ann Coulter comments about what enlisted men think of Murtha/Kerry type rhetoric was dead on correct. I see Murtha's defenders have, after a brief attack, avoided what Ann said and she had to revisit it in her column this week.

It is a subject which needs to be aired.
 
Upvote 0

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟101,609.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
JustOneWay said:
Thanks for the link.






Does this mean that the Army also got their intel from Murtha?
No, but if you'll check your dates you'll see that Murtha's claimsed the call ups would be in November involving LARGE numbers. Different situations
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,481
✟214,455.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
MachZer0 said:
No, but if you'll check your dates you'll see that Murtha's claimsed the call ups would be in November involving LARGE numbers. Different situations
5600 isn't a large number?

Your attack on Murtha is specific, and your link was vague. Got a better article?
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,481
✟214,455.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
MachZer0 said:
No, but if you'll check your dates you'll see that Murtha's claimsed the call ups would be in November involving LARGE numbers. Different situations
Another source included this information to their story:
LINK
Murtha released a statement saying he had ''learned through conversations with officials at the Pentagon" that the White House would ''call up large numbers" of reservists if the Bush-Cheney ticket is reelected.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan yesterday blasted the suggestion of a new reservist call-up as ''just another baseless attack."
The Bush campaign, separately, released a statement by Senator Pete V. Domenici of New Mexico, a member of the defense appropriations panel, who charged that Senate leaders on defense matters have not been told of such a plan and that ''this kind of speculation" was harmful to reservists and their families.
''Desperate candidates are generally not the most accurate sources of information on these issues," Domenici said.
While the Defense Department has announced a new rotation of reservists and National Guard members to Iraq this winter, military commanders have told Murtha that too few reservists have been called up to prepare for the mission and up to 2,500 more will be needed, according to aides to Murtha, the ranking Democrat on the House panel that writes the Pentagon's budget.

A senior aide to Murtha, who spoke on condition of anonymity yesterday, cautioned that a new call-up was not a certainty, saying enough reservists may still be mobilized by November to avoid one.
So the LARGE numbers you are talking about is 2500?
 
Upvote 0

Voegelin

Reactionary
Aug 18, 2003
20,145
1,430
Connecticut
✟26,726.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Quiz time! Who said this?
I fear . . . the administration is considering what is tantamount to a cut-and-run strategy. Their sudden embrace of accelerated Iraqification and American troop withdrawal dates, without adequate stability, is an invitation to failure. The hard work of rebuilding Iraq must not be dictated by the schedule of the next American election.

Answer here
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,481
✟214,455.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
MachZer0 said:
In 2004, Murtha also claimed that he knew from conversations with Pentagon officials that after the 2004 elections, Bush had secret plans to call up massive numbers Of the Individual Ready reserve. It never happened. Seems like Murtha's Pentagon sources are not what we would refer to as reliable


Murtha's statement: the Bush Administration plans to call up large numbers of the military guard and reserves, to include plans that they previously put off to call up the Individual Ready Reserve.


When did Murtha say that massive numbers of the Individual Ready Reserve would be called up?





*
 
Upvote 0