Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Multiverse Theory and multiple Ezekiel 37 type events.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kaon" data-source="post: 72628453" data-attributes="member: 407930"><p>Yes.</p><p></p><p>4th dimension is the beginning of "simultenaity" of time described by him - which is <em>space-time</em>. It is the curvature of 3-D space to make up a 4th spacial dimension that is <em>coupled</em> with time.</p><p></p><p>The 5th dimension: is a glome of that glome - where you see 4D at every orthogonal point in the 5th dimension.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Time is for our convenience; it measures </strong><u><em><strong>changes in action</strong></em></u>. It is a <strong>constraint</strong> we put on lower spacial dimension for our sake (our dimension we think we operate in) - so that we do not experience everything at once. (As per the Most High God, everything that will happen <strong>has already happened.)</strong> The rabii is also right in that there is only "one time line/lifeline," even if there are ways to "see the future or past, and 'interact' with it." For example, a "traveller" from 2087 who dies in 2018 <strong>would have always died in 2018, despite being born in, say, 2060. That is his/her <em>unique life line</em> - what I would call it.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p>When 24, 11, or 10 dimensions are predicted to exist by theory, these are <em>spacial</em> dimensions with <em>time coupled</em> to the spaces. The <em>math</em> that predicts these dimensions treat time as a parameter necessary for evolving a <strong>basis of dimensions</strong>. The basis set depends on the theory used. But, time itself does not exist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kaon, post: 72628453, member: 407930"] Yes. 4th dimension is the beginning of "simultenaity" of time described by him - which is [I]space-time[/I]. It is the curvature of 3-D space to make up a 4th spacial dimension that is [I]coupled[/I] with time. The 5th dimension: is a glome of that glome - where you see 4D at every orthogonal point in the 5th dimension. [B]Time is for our convenience; it measures [/B][U][I][B]changes in action[/B][/I][/U]. It is a [B]constraint[/B] we put on lower spacial dimension for our sake (our dimension we think we operate in) - so that we do not experience everything at once. (As per the Most High God, everything that will happen [B]has already happened.)[/B] The rabii is also right in that there is only "one time line/lifeline," even if there are ways to "see the future or past, and 'interact' with it." For example, a "traveller" from 2087 who dies in 2018 [B]would have always died in 2018, despite being born in, say, 2060. That is his/her [I]unique life line[/I] - what I would call it. [/B] When 24, 11, or 10 dimensions are predicted to exist by theory, these are [I]spacial[/I] dimensions with [I]time coupled[/I] to the spaces. The [I]math[/I] that predicts these dimensions treat time as a parameter necessary for evolving a [B]basis of dimensions[/B]. The basis set depends on the theory used. But, time itself does not exist. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Multiverse Theory and multiple Ezekiel 37 type events.
Top
Bottom