Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No.Is it offensive to refer to God with the feminine pronoun?
A lot of people say it isn't offensive to talk of God in male pronouns because 'he' is gender neutral. I can see where they're coming from, but this worries me even more. Our society is so deeply patriarchal that people don't even realise that 'he' is not, never has been, never will be and cannot ever become, a gender neutral pronoun.
In a way just saying 'that's how it's always been' betrays something much more entrenched and endemic than deliberately excluding over half of the world's population. It shows that we so used to doing it we don't even notice any more.
That's why I refer to God as 'she'--to try to make people step back and wonder why we never question saying 'he' all the time.
Is it offensive to refer to God with the feminine pronoun?
I often use "she" to refer to God in the same way that many contemporary philosophers, especially philosophers of ethics, use female examples in their writings: I wish to raise the consciousness of my readers, and I do not want people to think that I am using "he" in a gendered way.
I also like imagining God with some feminine characteristics. It's fun to think about.
I wouldn't recommend changing traditional literature, but I do think referring to God as "she" now and again can be helpful. However, interestingly, some people here who shall not be named seem to regard it as mockery.
I don't take offense, and I don't see it as a mockery, but...
I think of God as "he" and Mother Nature as "she" so I automatically assume that anyone who refers to God as "she" is talking about a pagan god and not the Christian God.
No theological references to back up my "arguement" - thats just how I have interpreted things.
Have you ever heard a Christian refer to God as "she"? (Curious!)
Interesting! I could make some sulky remarks about the pervading association of the feminine with the sinister, but I won't
I am not usually talking about Yahweh. I think it's probably reasonable to say that Yahweh's definitely a dude because he has a wife (unless he's a lesbian, I guess, but I doubt that'd be a popular view, exciting though it may be).
You can make what ever remarks you like! Mother Nature isn't always sinister is she?! The sun was shining beautifully here today!
I had never thought about it really. I will listen out from now on and report back to you at a later date!
I've never really liked the use of the name Yahweh to seperate from the Biblical God because the old testament both gives us that name for God and also firmly condemns the notion of Asherah (particularly in Kings).
I understand that for scholarly work it can be useful, but it can sometimes come across as insulting (as in a "I know more about your God than you do" sort of thing).
One way to look at it is to turn the question around: is it wrong/offensive to refer to God exclusively as male? As has been noted by other responders, although some people can see "He" and read it as gender neutral*, others associate such male pronouns with distinctly male characteristics. Therefore, using male language solely creates the impression -- even if "only" subconsciously -- that God is male. I suppose True_Blue, thrusting Christianity forward into the 12th century, would be happy with that, but I think that most theologians agree that God is outside gender. Add in the wider sociological implications of a patriarchal theology (like, giving the distinct message that women are inferior) and I'd say it is indeed wrong to perpetrate the false impression that God is exclusively male. Hence, it is ok -- even beneficial -- to refer to God as female.
Now, all that said, what I wonder about is why the Church hasn't pushed for plural pronoun usage, as is now becoming common in secular contexts. Modern English usage typically allows breaking number agreement to use plural nouns as gender-neutral singular (eg "If any employee has a problem with the new dress code, they may bring their concerns to their supervisor..."). Why not use They for God? I suppose that might raise some theological (Trinity) issues, but it seems like a good compromise, plus having the advantage of being consistent with secular usage. Any thoughts on this?
* But since that's in the context of God, that's usually because they've been raised in that mindset. For someone with a different cultural perspective, that's much more difficult.
If God's character qualities could be placed on a gender continuum, he would be much closer to the male side than the female side by virtue of Jesus' masculinity.
Do you think the Jesus presented in the gospels is especially masculine? Ignoring the gender bias of the time he lived in for a moment here, could the same role not have been fulfilled by a woman?
That is to say: I see good reasons to have a male messiah if you're going to have them coming to visit humanity in first century Palestine, but in a post-feminist world (which we haven't arrived at yet, by the way), couldn't Jesus just as easily have been a woman?
Can you imagine a woman of that era taking a whip and overturning tables in the temple and violently driving out the moneychangers?Do you think the Jesus presented in the gospels is especially masculine? Ignoring the gender bias of the time he lived in for a moment here, could the same role not have been fulfilled by a woman?
That is to say: I see good reasons to have a male messiah if you're going to have them coming to visit humanity in first century Palestine, but in a post-feminist world (which we haven't arrived at yet, by the way), couldn't Jesus just as easily have been a woman?
Can you imagine a woman of that era taking a whip and overturning tables in the temple and violently driving out the moneychangers?
I see good reasons to have a male messiah if you're going to have them coming to visit humanity in first century Palestine, but in a post-feminist world (which we haven't arrived at yet, by the way), couldn't Jesus just as easily have been a woman?
[SIZE=-1] God is a Girl
Right now youtube is down though...
Anyways, why not use it? Also, can I use it to refer to people also?
[/SIZE]
I don't think the question is answerable. Jesus didn't just happen to be born in 1st century palestine; Jesus is the culmination of the whole story of Israel, and as such needs to be male because that's how Israel's story is structured. There is no story to point to what he/she would be in a post-feminist world. Jesus human gender was sealed with the birth of Isaac.Do you think the Jesus presented in the gospels is especially masculine? Ignoring the gender bias of the time he lived in for a moment here, could the same role not have been fulfilled by a woman?
That is to say: I see good reasons to have a male messiah if you're going to have them coming to visit humanity in first century Palestine, but in a post-feminist world (which we haven't arrived at yet, by the way), couldn't Jesus just as easily have been a woman?
I don't think the question is answerable. Jesus didn't just happen to be born in 1st century palestine; Jesus is the culmination of the whole story of Israel, and as such needs to be male because that's how Israel's story is structured. There is no story to point to what he/she would be in a post-feminist world. Jesus human gender was sealed with the birth of Isaac.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?