• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Moving Against Dependency

Status
Not open for further replies.

PassionFruit

I woke up like dis
May 18, 2007
3,755
313
In the valley of the wind
✟35,550.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Democrat
You are right -- most people do not think that way -- but rather, they live that way. Everyone thinks charity is a great thing but how many people actually give?

And you are also right that this is a coping mechanism we have -- usually to cope with something as simple as boredom and lack of anything to do.

I understand your post and I would say more power to the Straight Edge folks.

I find it interesting that many people are quick to denounce drug use as an indicator of trying to cope with an un-fulfilling life. If we're going to go down that road, then reading fiction, watching sitcoms, going to the cinema and enjoying your imagination are all indicators of coping with an unfulfilled life.

Well I wasn't indicating that some people turn to drugs as a way to cope with an unfulfilling life. Some people turn to drugs as way to cope with something that has happened in their lives that may have been tragic for them. Perhaps they do it, because of depression, and they don't know of a another way to deal with it.
 
Upvote 0

cantata

Queer non-theist, with added jam.
Feb 20, 2007
6,215
683
38
Oxford, UK
✟32,193.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I like sex, but I don't feel empty or unfulfilled when I'm not having it.

There are lots of other things I like doing. Am I dependent on listening to music? Am I dependent on drawing or writing or singing or studying or caring about my friends and family? Why single out sex and drugs as things on which people are "dependent" but reject other things?

Well, obviously, because the OP has a moral problem with these things and also, I would imagine, a personal sense of guilt. Your vices aren't everyone's vices, JM.
 
Upvote 0

Verv

Senior Veteran
Apr 17, 2005
7,278
673
Gyeonggido
✟48,571.00
Country
Korea, Republic Of
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I find it interesting that many people are quick to denounce drug use as an indicator of trying to cope with an un-fulfilling life. If we're going to go down that road, then reading fiction, watching sitcoms, going to the cinema and enjoying your imagination are all indicators of coping with an unfulfilled life.

Yes, there are people who escape for a while with drugs because their lives have been ruined. There are just as many, if not more, who vegetate in front of the TV or get lost in pop-fiction for the same reason. And there are vastly greater numbers of people who enjoy fictional entertainment and/or intoxicating/mind altering drugs as part of a fulfilling, happy life.

I also don't think addiction always means someone is doing something they wish they didn't need or want to. It is possible to be addicted to cigarettes, chocolate, TV etc. and want to lose that addiction. It is just as possible to be addicted and also on a free and rational level realise you enjoy those things and don't want to stop.

Sci-fi novels, film, etc. can be good and fulfilling forms of entertainment that are also educational. Of course, sitting around watching prime time TV is pretty ridiculous as the benefits of Friends is quite questionable though someone who religiously watches the History Channel does have a good hobbie.

Drugs even more directly than couch potatoism directly hurts the personw ho does it.

My bad! :doh:
It depends on what you mean by personally fulfilling. If the Russian soldier at the point of death feels a sense of satisfaction at a job well done, that sense of satisfaction is due to chemicals in his brain. Or if he feels like his life has been worth living, that is also a chemical sensation. I took 'personally fulfilling' to mean that subjective sense, because it is fulfilling to the person.

That is true and I think that many people would feel rightfully fulfilleld in that moment because to lay one's life down for a greater cause than oneself and one's own ends is inherently an accomplishment.


I like sex, but I don't feel empty or unfulfilled when I'm not having it.

There are lots of other things I like doing. Am I dependent on listening to music? Am I dependent on drawing or writing or singing or studying or caring about my friends and family? Why single out sex and drugs as things on which people are "dependent" but reject other things?

Well, obviously, because the OP has a moral problem with these things and also, I would imagine, a personal sense of guilt. Your vices aren't everyone's vices, JM.

Music, drawing, writing, studying, etc. is not an addiction or a negative dependency.

Yuo sort of demonstrate right here what I find so odd about the "free thinkers" and liberals on the website:

They are capable of equating drug addiction and sexual indulgence with music and loving their families, something that I just do not even think is comparable.

And even if we did define music or love of family as an addiction or an obsession I hardly think anyone whould feel that this fell down to the low moral depths of drug abuse.
 
Upvote 0
B

Braunwyn

Guest
They are capable of equating drug addiction and sexual indulgence with music and loving their families, something that I just do not even think is comparable.

And even if we did define music or love of family as an addiction or an obsession I hardly think anyone whould feel that this fell down to the low moral depths of drug abuse.
I think the point some are making is that not everyone who participates in sex that you don't approve of or who drinks etc are abusers. Your friends getting drunk to the point where they are violent and abusive are not comparable, for example, to a couple taking a wine tour/attending a wine expo, which are things I personally love to do. And they are no more important than painting, photography or other hobbies. IRT chemically altering substances I think it's the same for the most part. It's not the substances themselves that are an issue (for the most part), but the individual.

Do you think it's possible that the life you have created for yourself (hardcore/punk) is negatively coloring your worldview? I am very curious about it and what drives people to that scene.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WatersMoon110
Upvote 0

gwenmead

On walkabout
Jun 2, 2005
1,611
283
Seattle
✟25,642.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
jmverville said:
I am an abuser and have been an abuser for years now. I have had very few periods of time when I have been living the values.

I am going to try to change it -- not good for the body or the mind.

It takes a certain amount of hard introspection and honesty to realize something like this about oneself. I commend you for being able to do it, and I wish you much luck in your efforts to change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Verv
Upvote 0

PsychMJC

Regular Member
Nov 7, 2007
459
36
47
✟23,294.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Haha, yes. Oh dear. I cheated on Radiohead with Shelleyan Orphan this morning. :(
That's not nearly as bad as changing the song before it's finished with complete disregard for the artist.. or skipping back and forth between multiple CDs, that's just groddy (how DO you spell that)..
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
23,141
6,836
72
✟396,351.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I'm not straight-edge, but I don't drink or smoke. I hardly even drink soft drinks (approx. one a month at most). I drink the occasional chilled coffee when I can afford it (Arizona is generally too hot for warm drinks). I mostly drink fruit juices and water.

There is an important difference between substance use and substance abuse -- that difference is the degree to which the substance controls one's life.

Bingo. And a substance can be booze, drugs sex or chocolate! Or lots of other things I have left out.

I have a liquor cabinet worth hundreds of dollars. Part of why I have so much is that I rarely drink, so bottles rarely get emptied. But if I decide I want a good calvados I have it or congnac or armingnac(sp) or good rum. As long as I have some mixers I am ready to provide much of what a guest might like in this area. But they control me not at all. But someone with a 6 pack in the fridge may suffer greatly by how much it controls him.

Only one bottle of single malt scotch however. Glen Keith of course!

BTW I consider those who have to cut out all booze, sex, drugs and chocolate to in their own way to be just as much controlled by them as those who over indulge. Unless of course they don't like any of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Verv
Upvote 0

Robbie_James_Francis

May all beings have happiness and its causes
Apr 12, 2005
9,317
661
36
England, UK
✟35,261.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Sci-fi novels, film, etc. can be good and fulfilling forms of entertainment that are also educational. Of course, sitting around watching prime time TV is pretty ridiculous as the benefits of Friends is quite questionable though someone who religiously watches the History Channel does have a good hobbie.

Drugs can and do facilitate worthwhile activities and educational, social experiences by altering ways of thinking and engaging with other people.
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,302
✟190,302.00
Faith
Seeker
Yuo sort of demonstrate right here what I find so odd about the "free thinkers" and liberals on the website:

They are capable of equating drug addiction and sexual indulgence with music and loving their families, something that I just do not even think is comparable.
Well, personally I don´t even think that drug addiction and sex can be equated, and that´s what you did. In my understanding music and sex are closer than addictive drugs and sex.
If you have a problem with addictionI can certainly relate. People can be addicted to a lot of things (while there are substances that have an addictive potential regardless of the person and the circumstances).
However "loose" sex certainly isn´t necessarily an addiction any more than sex in a committed relationship is.
I can´t help assuming that in your moral system addictive in a committed relationship is not "negative". Thus, all you have done here is stacking the deck, and your argument is circular.
And even if we did define music or love of family as an addiction or an obsession I hardly think anyone whould feel that this fell down to the low moral depths of drug abuse.
Firstly, I don´t think of drug addiction as a moral issue but rather as a disease.
Secondly, the posts you have responded to referred to the "loose sex" part of your argument, not to the drug addiction part.
I think it would help your point greatly if you could demonstrate or substantiate that "loose sex" is inherently addictive or has an increased addictive potential (e.g. compared to "committed sex"). Else you are equating two complete incomparable things - which to point out was exactly the parodistic point of the music/family responses.
 
Upvote 0

Robbie_James_Francis

May all beings have happiness and its causes
Apr 12, 2005
9,317
661
36
England, UK
✟35,261.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
They are capable of equating drug addiction and sexual indulgence with music and loving their families, something that I just do not even think is comparable.

Firstly, we're really talking about drug use and not drug addiction. And no-one is equating anything. I'm certainly saying that enjoying sex or drug use can be comparable to enjoying music or the company of others, but that doesn't mean they are equal. All pleasures are comparable in some sense. If we can agree that, say, eating a chocolate bar and helping a fellow human being both elicit pleasure then the two can be compared but not equated. The former is obviously a different and lesser pleasure to the latter, but that doesn't mean the former is immoral or cannot form part of a happy, healthy and moral life.
 
Upvote 0

Wyzaard

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2008
3,458
746
✟7,200.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sexual and chemical indulgence makes you dependent on external forces.

We are ALL dependent upon external forces; we cannot escape the material and cultural contexts we have lived and do live within.

It turns you into a slave to these obsessions and forces pain into your life. When you do not have these pleasures your life feels empty. You do not even feel like yourself unless you are in a chemically induced state or receiving sexual pleasures.
One could easily insert 'Faith' into the subject box and get just as valid a result; one can be a slave to many things for many reasons and to various consequenses.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Verv

Senior Veteran
Apr 17, 2005
7,278
673
Gyeonggido
✟48,571.00
Country
Korea, Republic Of
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Do you think it's possible that the life you have created for yourself (hardcore/punk) is negatively coloring your worldview? I am very curious about it and what drives people to that scene.

I think what drives us there is a sense of skepticism from a young age concerning the values of the world we are in.

Most people go to punk/hardcore because they dislike the trends of their peers and find the mainstream music and culture to be un-exciting and generally stupid.

A lot of people in the scene do not value money or beauty in the conventional sense but rather you will find the average person is generally artistic and/or intellectual, has some interesting takes on society and often times does not come from some upper crust background (thsi drives some to our scene -- in their poverty the most open arms they found was us).

In a sense I will go so far as to say that we are sometimes overly critical of the norm.

I think my world view is quite different because of my experiences in the scene, and I think a lot of the things within the scene can become magnified and made more extreme just by the sort of people who embrace them.

Braun, that was a good and thought provoking question that if I were to fully answer would require us to talk about it nearly as much as we speak of homosexuality.

It takes a certain amount of hard introspection and honesty to realize something like this about oneself. I commend you for being able to do it, and I wish you much luck in your efforts to change.

Much appreciated -- I am glad that we can look past any divisive lines that we my have ideologically and feel a good connection on this point.

BTW I consider those who have to cut out all booze, sex, drugs and chocolate to in their own way to be just as much controlled by them as those who over indulge. Unless of course they don't like any of them.

That makes sense in a lot of situations as they now so rigidly define themselves as not using them.

However, there are some people who just dislike the taste of it and have no desire to consume it and others who perhaps admit that they were once slaves to the substance...

And now in realizing what it did to themselves they are now slaves to sobriety.

Drugs can and do facilitate worthwhile activities and educational, social experiences by altering ways of thinking and engaging with other people.

I agree that to some extent alcohol can play the muse of myself though I think other drugs often disorientate people so much it can be damaging.

Very occasional use could be creative, I would say, but the risks associated with becoming addicted or overdosing seem rather dangerous to me.

Well, personally I don´t even think that drug addiction and sex can be equated, and that´s what you did. In my understanding music and sex are closer than addictive drugs and sex.
If you have a problem with addictionI can certainly relate. People can be addicted to a lot of things (while there are substances that have an addictive potential regardless of the person and the circumstances).
However "loose" sex certainly isn´t necessarily an addiction any more than sex in a committed relationship is.

Well, you are right, to a good extent but I do know that some people who have ruined their social lives because of their reckless pursuit of sex. In some ways so irreparably.

A lot of women may stand by a man who is a drug addict and trying to change -- but what about a frequenter of prostitutes or someone who has chronic affairs?

This can ruin lives in some ways even more than drug addiction.

Firstly, I don´t think of drug addiction as a moral issue but rather as a disease.

Could you call drug use a moral problem as it possibly provokes this destructive disease?

Secondly, the posts you have responded to referred to the "loose sex" part of your argument, not to the drug addiction part.
I think it would help your point greatly if you could demonstrate or substantiate that "loose sex" is inherently addictive or has an increased addictive potential (e.g. compared to "committed sex"). Else you are equating two complete incomparable things - which to point out was exactly the parodistic point of the music/family responses.

I will say that I do not know enough about it to speak to what level it is addictive; perhaps to some it is not at all just like some can drink alcohol and not let it take over their lives.

However, I have met many men who have destroyed their marriages and in many senses of the word destroyed their credibility and hurt many people due to their sexual addictions.
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,302
✟190,302.00
Faith
Seeker
Well, you are right, to a good extent but I do know that some people who have ruined their social lives because of their reckless pursuit of sex. In some ways so irreparably.
I know a lot of people who have ruined their social lives because of excessive behaviours of various sorts. This does not make a case against the behaviours, but against excess.

A lot of women may stand by a man who is a drug addict and trying to change -- but what about a frequenter of prostitutes or someone who has chronic affairs?
I´m not sure I understand why you ask this question. You seem to shift the goalpost from "men having loose sex" to "married men having sex with others".


This can ruin lives in some ways even more than drug addiction.
Yes, it can. Driving a car can ruin lives, as well.



Could you call drug use a moral problem as it possibly provokes this destructive disease?
Yes, I could - in the same way I could call anything that possibly has destructive tendencies and/or effects a moral problem - which would be pretty much everything.



I will say that I do not know enough about it to speak to what level it is addictive; perhaps to some it is not at all just like some can drink alcohol and not let it take over their lives.
For starters, it would be sufficient to support the idea that "loose sex" is more addictive than "committed sex" at all.

However, I have met many men who have destroyed their marriages and in many senses of the word destroyed their credibility and hurt many people due to their sexual addictions.
I wasn´t aware that this thread was about married men. I don´t think you made that clear in the OP.
On the other hand, I know a lot of persons who have destroyed their relationships by marrying.
 
Upvote 0

Oneofthediaspora

Junior Member
Jul 9, 2008
1,071
76
Liverpool
✟24,124.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Moderation is true temperance.

All pleasures are *potentially* addictive. Some are more addictive than others and some people have a much lower threshold.

Any pleasure pursued in a selfish and uncontrolled manner that causes a person to neglect his/her duties is damaging.

Say, for example, you have a pleasure that you pursue so singlemindedly that it causes you to neglect your children; it wouldn't really matter whether the pleasure is cocaine or fine art; you will have become a person most people would not like to be.

Now, there is an argument that it is not the pleasure but the person's selfishness that is to blame. I would probably agree with this argument; but the end is the same. If you know you can't control certain pleasures; the only sensible thing is not to pursue them.
 
Upvote 0
B

Braunwyn

Guest
Braun, that was a good and thought provoking question that if I were to fully answer would require us to talk about it nearly as much as we speak of homosexuality.
Yea, at the very least the psychology of the scene warrants its own thread. Actually, looking at 'scenes' in general would be very interesting. Although, as I think I mentioned earlier, punk/hardcore seems to involve an elevated level of commitment.

I think what drives us there is a sense of skepticism from a young age concerning the values of the world we are in.
I found this to be the case with my ex. He was value driven and quite extreme about it but at the same time, things often got messy. It seems like you might be able to relate. He had problems with alcohol abuse and he was very hard on himself about it.

Most people go to punk/hardcore because they dislike the trends of their peers and find the mainstream music and culture to be un-exciting and generally stupid.
lol that's so familiar as I remember hearing almost those exacts words from my ex.

A lot of people in the scene do not value money or beauty in the conventional sense but rather you will find the average person is generally artistic and/or intellectual, has some interesting takes on society and often times does not come from some upper crust background (thsi drives some to our scene -- in their poverty the most open arms they found was us).

In a sense I will go so far as to say that we are sometimes overly critical of the norm.

I think my world view is quite different because of my experiences in the scene, and I think a lot of the things within the scene can become magnified and made more extreme just by the sort of people who embrace them.
That makes sense and I can appreciate a rejection of societal values but it's not healthy, imo, for a person to corner themselves with their worldviews, especially if there's too much negativity cultivated. Hardcore folk take themselves very seriously, if my take on it is correct and ime, that can lead to a lot of sorrow. In this sense, I think the christian angle is helpful to hardcore people if Christ can temper them.
 
Upvote 0

Robbie_James_Francis

May all beings have happiness and its causes
Apr 12, 2005
9,317
661
36
England, UK
✟35,261.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
I agree that to some extent alcohol can play the muse of myself though I think other drugs often disorientate people so much it can be damaging.

Very occasional use could be creative, I would say, but the risks associated with becoming addicted or overdosing seem rather dangerous to me.

I think it depends on the person, the situation and many other factors as to whether someone finds alcohol or another drug more or less disorientating.

Realistically, I think the singling out of alcohol as generally less harmful, addictive or intoxicating is based on an irrational cultural attitude. We're used to seeing alcohol used in moderation, even used to the point of intoxication but still as part of a productive, happy non-addicted life. Why can't we look at other drugs in the same way? Out of the drinkers I know, there is more addiction and serious harm than there is amongst the users of cannabis, ecstasy, aphetamines, MDMA, cocaine or mushrooms.

Personally, I find the idea that, say, cocaine is more disorientating than alcohol absurd. It's hard to believe anyone who holds that opinion has ever seen anyone using cocaine, let alone used it themselves. I would not hesitate to say that cannabis, cocaine, ecstasy, speed and MDMA all tend (for me, and many I know) to elucidate and aid socialising whilst alcohol often does the opposite, dulling and destroying the brain.

I won't try to claim, therefore, that alcohol cannot be enjoyed without it being addictive, destructive or an indicator and cause of an unhappy existence. Why, then, should anyone claim all other drugs are solely because they have cultural prejudice on their side?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.