• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

More whacky ideas about peer review from ICR.

Status
Not open for further replies.

theFijian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 30, 2003
8,898
476
West of Scotland
Visit site
✟86,155.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
archaeologist said:
wow! now you are a moderator---

what that response demonstrates is that such beliefs are a matter of convenience and people refuse to deal with the reality of what God's word is sayig.
That's funny becasue somewhere else I could have sworn you were trying to tell me not to participate in discussion. I'm just pointing out that your debate tactics are fundamentally dishonest.
 
Upvote 0

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
you pick one phrase and ignore the rest---typical---

i said be honest.
Lets see...

You should really stop condemning people for figurative intepretations when you can't even recognise allegory in the book of Revelation.
 
Upvote 0

archaeologist

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2007
1,051
23
✟23,813.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private

this is what i asked for --- your opinion and what did i get, tap dancing.

give me your opinion on the verses stated, i was not leaving anything out on purpose but just randomly chose some to get a fix on what you are thinking about what is or isn't allegorical.

can you do that and be honest at the same time? be straight forward.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
people are put in prison for stalking. stop hounding my replies.

And people are shown to be dishonest debators when they refuse to respond to legitimate replies to their posts and instead whine about persecution.
 
Reactions: theFijian
Upvote 0

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Actually you this one first.
nice way to sweep away the truths of the Bible. by the way, do youy think the passages about those believing and following God and get to be with Him forever is allegorical?
rev. 21: 1-4
or
rev. 22:7-17
Which as I have dealt with quite thoroughly, pointing out seven different allegorical and metaphorical figures in just the two passages you mentioned. Of course you accuse us of tap dancing but you utterly avoided dealing with the allegory I pointed out. Nice one archie.

You first response to my list of allegories was to claim:
you pick one phrase and ignore the rest---typical---
i said be honest.
Actually it was seven phrases and another two in verses you had skipped. Again this is typical archie honesty.

Then when I listed out all the phrases I had dealt with and quoted the scripture they came from, your only response was: false accusation ignored

You followed your original rev. 21: 1-4 & 22:7-17 post with:
Now you accuse us of tap dancing for thoroughly answering your first question instead of your second question? I would have thought in an honest debate, you would actually deal with the answers we give, and if a second question you asked got missed along the way you could bring it up again. But claiming our not answering your second question is tap dancing, when you haven't responded to our answers to your first question, isn't that, well, tap dancing?
 
Upvote 0

archaeologist

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2007
1,051
23
✟23,813.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
[QUOTEso in your mind, in revelation, what is God a symbol of? the final judgement? the Holy Spirit? and so on

are you saying that what God said in revelations is not what is going to take place? (granted Joohn did not have the vocabularly to describe certain things he saw, after all he was shown the future and ancient greek was not fully versed in modern words)

that there will be no justice for believers? that the devil and his followers will not go to the lake of fire?

please be honest about what you believe.][/QUOTE]

there are the questions you have not dealt with. plus:

'i saw a new heaven and a new earth'
'for the first heaven and earth had passed away'
'and there was no more sea'
'from God'

shall i continue? i also asked

please be honest about what you believe.

your post doesn't state what you believe. we get a lot of:

and so on. not one word about what you believe about those passages. yes, you tapped danced.
 
Upvote 0

Rudolph Hucker

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2007
1,540
332
Canberra ACT
✟26,803.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Conservative

Are there not some churches that do not admit Revelations in their canon?
 
Upvote 0

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Talk about honesty. I answered your first question in which you asked if I believed these passages were allegorical:

Originally Posted by archaeologist

nice way to sweep away the truths of the Bible. by the way, do youy think the passages about those believing and following God and get to be with Him forever is allegorical?
rev. 21: 1-4
or
rev. 22:7-17
You complain about my answer to you first question listing all the metaphor and allegory in these passages, because I did not answer the 'please be honest about what you believe' you asked in your second question.

And still you refuse to deal with my reply to your first question. And you accuse us of tap dancing.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.