More 'Hobbits' found

[john crawford]

Neo-Darwinism says that all of us, including current Africans, share common ancestory with a single tribe in Africa.

Singling out one single African tribe above all others for special recognition and evolutionist distinction in the name of neo-Darwinist 'natural' selection, is obviously another blatant example of neo-Darwinist racial discrimination against all those African tribes that weren't selected.

Current Africans are no closer to that common ancestor than any other group of people. That's what neo-Darwinism says.

Yes, of course, but at the same time, neo-Darwinist theorists racially discriminate against hundreds of African tribes by selecting them for historic extinction in favor of the sole survival of one tribe alone. Not only that, but neo-Darwinists believe that all those African tribes which they theorize became extinct, originally evolved from more primitive African people who themselves originated from African ape and monkey ancestors.

None of this ever happened in real life, but that's what neo-Darwinist race theorists believe about human evolution in Africa.

 

[Loudmouth]

Singling out one single African tribe above all others for special recognition and evolutionist distinction in the name of neo-Darwinist 'natural' selection, is obviously another blatant example of neo-Darwinist racial discrimination against all those African tribes that weren't selected.

How can I be discriminating to people who don't exist?

Yes, of course, but at the same time, neo-Darwinist theorists racially discriminate against hundreds of African tribes by selecting them for historic extinction in favor of the sole survival of one tribe alone. Not only that, but neo-Darwinists believe that all those African tribes which they theorize became extinct, originally evolved from more primitive African people who themselves originated from African ape and monkey ancestors.

The tribe that made and the tribes that didn't share a common ancestor. They are descendants of the same people, and were interfertile so they were the same people. No matter how you try to poison the well you still can't make the facts go away. All humans share a common ancestor with each other. All humans share a common ancestor with all apes. All humans share a common ancestor with all primates, with all mammals, with all chordates, with all metazoans, with all animal life, and will all life on this planet. Exactly who am I being racist towards? All non-life?

None of this ever happened in real life, but that's what neo-Darwinist race theorists believe about human evolution in Africa.

What facts lead you to believe that it didn't?

 

[ChrisPelletier]

Yes, of course, but at the same time, neo-Darwinist theorists racially discriminate against hundreds of African tribes by selecting them for historic extinction in favor of the sole survival of one tribe alone. Not only that, but neo-Darwinists believe that all those African tribes which they theorize became extinct, originally evolved from more primitive African people who themselves originated from African ape and monkey ancestors.

Too bad you don't know what your talking about, again. No one tribe was selected. One population of early Africans eventually moved into the rest of the world out of Africa. This sounds the same so far doesn't it? Well that's not the whole story. The population of people from which the "out of African's" came from could interbreed with other africans. All of the populations of early humans in Africa were different (much like people around the world today are different), but they were able to breed with one another.

 

[john crawford]

How can I be discriminating to people who don't exist?

The tribe that made and the tribes that didn't share a common ancestor. They are descendants of the same people, and were interfertile so they were the same people. No matter how you try to poison the well you still can't make the facts go away. All humans share a common ancestor with each other. All humans share a common ancestor with all apes.

That's where neo-Darwinist theories start getting racist - In Africa.

 

[john crawford]

The population of people from which the "out of African's" came from could interbreed with other africans. All of the populations of early humans in Africa were different (much like people around the world today are different), but they were able to breed with one another.

That would be my theory about African origins precisely. The problem is though, that neo-Darwinist race theorists divide early African people up into different 'species' in order to link and associate the oldest and most primitive ape-like 'species' to common ancestors of African ape and monkeys.