Moratorium

[BenAdam]

Does it apply here?

 

[jeolmstead]

Does it apply here?

Don't know.....

 

[Tamara224]

I don't think so.

 

[Br0kenSunshyne]

KNowing our luck.....probably

 

[pdudgeon]

nope, only in the main forum.

 

[Br0kenSunshyne]

WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF


THERE. Now I got that out of my system. I feel better.

 

[jeolmstead]

WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF WOF


THERE. Now I got that out of my system. I feel better.

....who let the dogs out?

John O.

 

[Br0kenSunshyne]

I confess...... It was Tamera.

 

[pdudgeon]

laughing with you!

 

[Tamara224]

I confess...... It was Tamera.

 

[robbymac]

removed because people were misquoting it and using it to defame this sub-forum.

 

[BenAdam]

Rob,

I feel for you dude, just remember that we need to be allowed to make mistakes. Some of the people that are right now causing you grief will come up to you at some point in the future and ask you for forgivness.

 

[BenAdam]

You know, I am thinking I like this moratorium in practice if not in principal.

 

[ARBITER01]

You know, I am thinking I like this moratorium in practice if not in principal.

It's put everything wof into one thread instead of multiple threads and massive debate and reporting ensuing.

 

[BenAdam]

It's put everything wof into one thread instead of multiple threads and massive debate and reporting ensuing.

Quite frankly I'm tired of dealing with most of the WoF junk. Not all of it is, but like the stuff you pointed out.

 

[ARBITER01]

Quite frankly I'm tired of dealing with most of the WoF junk. Not all of it is, but like the stuff you pointed out.

It is getting old. I could care less about what teaching those guys wish to post either, every bit of it is on some website demeaning it, and most of the time the website is right when you look it up.

There is no real need for that general section anymore. It is as bad as the deliverance section that got removed recently.

 

[lismore]

Does it apply here?

Neither know nor care

Someone with a title posts some off the wall orders and we like little sheep follow along!!!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arhk6Hq6Mm8

 

[zaksmummy]

I like it it has brought us a bit of peace

 

[ARBITER01]

This was in the new thread,..

And speaking of changing names, I think the’ higher powers’ should insisted on dropping the name ‘Non-Word Of Faith’ and they can choose any name under the sun they want besides that because, (even if not intentional by some, but is by others), it appears to tell what they don’t believe instead of what they DO believe, which the whole purpose for the name of a church or group is to show what they BELIEVE. So what I have here is ONLY a temporary suggestion.

I posted in response to this, as I think it was just another potshot at you guy's with an agenda. Any name change needs to come from you, not another group.

Charimatic Non-wof is probably the best terminology that could have been employed to make no mistake of your stance before others.

I'm not posting this to incite a riot, just to let people know.

 

[Tamara224]

So, as far as I can tell this moratorium has only resulted in making it even easier for detractors to get a perfectly innocent thread closed. All someone has to do now is come in and accuse the OP of having WoF in mind (even if he/she doesn't mention WoF or a WoF related doctrine) and the thread will be summarily closed. Case in point: http://christianforums.com/t7166338-nt-wright-quote-cognitive-dissonance.html