Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Too bad im afraid.I prefer to think of it as a system of values that provide guidelines as to how to act correctly in society, so as not to be shunned or hated by those around you. Society dislikes immoral people because they are often disruptive.
I prefer to think of it as a system of values that provide guidelines as to how to act correctly in society, so as not to be shunned or hated by those around you. Society dislikes immoral people because they are often disruptive.
Ataraxia was the goal of the stoics, the epicurians, and I think maybe the skeptics, too. Eudaimonia is the goal of the Aristotelians, who have taken to calling themselves Eudaimonists. This is also called virtue ethics.
What exactly is the worth of gold or a dollar?
The true master is the one who masters his life and mind beyond the material world.
If your motivation to be a moral person is "a fear of God" or "to get to heaven" then are you truly a moral person?
I'd say that the true master is the one who masters his life and mind in the material world. Such a master would rule money, not be ruled by it as is so common.
The true slaves to money are the people who hate money and look to the "non-material" only. They are horribly dependent on money (or any form of wealth) for their survival. Money rules them.
Interesting question. It reminds me of Kant's insistence that anything done outside of duty can't be moral. I vehemently disagree with Kant that desire and duty are antithesis. It seems that, if duty is the basis of morality, than there is a split between my will and my desire, and in many cases, this is true. As C.S. Lewis pointed out, sometimes we are satisfied by lesser things when greater desires await us. But, the ultimate moral person would desire the good, and duty would become delight. My point, I guess, is that this can be a start of moral consciousness, but at some point, the good must be seen as the good and desired because it is good. One must go from following a set of rules to embodying a morality. The fear of the lord can be a beginning of wisdom, but is not the end of it.
Morality can be an admirable thing. The moral man is the one who is constantly seeking to be a judge of good and evil. He needs to be a judge so he can see what is evil and avoid it, and see what is good and do it. Doing this, truly doing this, requires subjugating his entire life to this operation. So he will spend his time either dealing with decisions he has to make or anticipating decisions between good and evil in the future. This view is represented in the Bible by the Pharisees
The Christian morality, however, is somthing quite different. Jesus was always being questioned by the phairisees. They were trying to decide wether he was good or bad. Ultimately, they would decide he was bad, and he would be put to death. It is notible to observe that he never involves himself in their world. His answers always go above and beyond their questions, such as to make them appear small minded. Rather than being concerned with right and wrong- legalism or works- that is, our God is concerned with his love for us, which he wishes to express by relating to us (grace and the personal relationship.) Therefore, the foundation of christian morality is a relationship with christ, and a relationship with eachother (the church.) A christian does not need to constantly 'judge' between good and evil. He just 'knows' what he must do. He doesnt need to swear oaths or make promoises. He understands what he must do without that.
The moralist, with everything set before him, with his maps and guns and a stock of provisions that will last for years, is a remarkably anxious and unsure man. The christian, with nothing but his daily bread, is yet marked by a certain kind of certainty within himself.
Sadly, most moralists have been unable to adhere to the pharisitic standard. Most Christians have been unable to become saints, though we are confident that there is another time where there will be some time for that.
I think, however, that this problem could be well put out if people did a little bit more reading. I credit Bonhoffer for a lot of these insights I just gave you. I really believe that if everyone read the great apologies, only a few would be left with real doubts about the truth of Christianity.
Likewise, it might also be observed that if certain christians could be made to read books on science and other religions, their tolerance and subjection to reason might thereby be considerably increased.
Ah, sorry for that tangent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?