Moondust

[AV1611VET]

Looks like NASA got a reality check when the depth of the moondust failed to return a deeptime scenario.

Evidently they had to readjust the amount of average yearly dustfall to accommodate this new discovery.

50 x 4 = 200, but if the product is found to be only 100, then it looks like one of the factors is going to have to be halved: either the 50 to 25, or the 4 to 2.

 

[Shemjaza]

Looks like NASA got a reality check when the depth of the moondust failed to return a deeptime scenario.

Evidently they had to readjust the amount of average yearly dustfall to accommodate this new discovery.

50 x 4 = 200, but if the product is found to be only 100, then it looks like one of the factors is going to have to be halved: either the 50 to 25, or the 4 to 2.

What's the source?

 

[Heissonear]

What's the source?

.

You are too young to remember the scenario - during the early Apollo touch downs the concerns! But Armstrong's famous foot print tells it all!



.

 

[Heissonear]

What's the source?

.


Yea, ask for evidence about the obvious, lol.



.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Yea, ask for evidence about the obvious, lol.

Now, now, Heiss -- the question was directed at the OP, and he doesn't need your help to fail to address it.

He can do that on his own.

 

[Lord Emsworth]

Mhmmmm ... Moondust.

To me the archetypical creationist argument.

 

[Eight Foot Manchild]

This argument is so utterly vacuous, even the blithering morons at AiG realize it's unusable,

Arguments Creationists Should Avoid - Answers in Genesis

 

[AV1611VET]

This argument is so utterly vacuous, even the blithering morons at AiG realize it's unusable,http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers/topic/arguments-we-dont-use

Good for them.

I will use it, however.

 

[pgp_protector]

Good for them.

I will use it, however.

With no citation either right?

 

[AV1611VET]

With no citation either right?

Right ... no citations.

 

[Loudmouth]

Right ... no citations.

It would make sense that someone who is convinced that made up stories are true would expect their own made up stories to convince others.

 

[Black Akuma]

.

You are too young to remember the scenario - during the early Apollo touch downs the concerns! But Armstrong's famous foot print tells it all!



.

Concerns? We'd sent things to the Moon before. We knew what it was like.

 

[CabVet]

Really? This argument has been debunked 10 times over, in this very forum. Short term memory loss? Or is it just selective memory?

 

[ToddNotTodd]

Really? This argument has been debunked 10 times over, in this very forum. Short term memory loss? Or is it just selective memory?

Dishonesty. Like soooooo many Christians I meet...

 

[theFijian]

So AV uses an argument he knows that even other Creationists won't touch, more attention deficit issues perhaps.

 

[Shemjaza]

I wasn't following the OP obviously. So just the old Moondust was too thin for deep time?

I think AV is just messing with us on this one, much like the threads where he quite deliberately phrases stuff with: "Kent Hovind says..."

Remember, AV doesn't have the desperate need for science to agree with his beliefs. I think he takes smirking pride in standing against science. He honestly doesn't give a fig what science, the moon or anything else secular has to say about deep time.

 

[Loudmouth]

I wasn't following the OP obviously. So just the old Moondust was too thin for deep time?

Apparently.

What I have always found funny is that this creationist argument relies on uniformiatarianism and naturalism, two things that creationists claim are false.

 

[kevinmaynard]

Dishonesty. Like soooooo many Christians I meet...

Not true. Just because someone claims to be a Christian doesn't mean they are. Satan is the father of lies. So when someone is lying you know where it comes from.

 

[Strathos]

I think AV is deliberately trying to make his side of the argument look bad now.

 

[USincognito]

You are too young to remember the scenario - during the early Apollo touch downs the concerns! But Armstrong's famous foot print tells it all!

Must be an alternative history line then. Luna, Surveyor and Ranger craft had done numerous hard and soft landings by 1969.