Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's the same as saying that a mirror gives off it's own reflection.
Well, if science fails so hard at explaining "god's creation", here is a very easy and unambiguous test: predict the next solar eclips wihout using any fruit of science. Since science fails so hard, the biblical method must be much more accurate than the scientific one "emeyerite"?-
What is nonsense is, science thinking they can even began to explain God's creation.
That would be correct, if the mirror took proprietary ownership of the light the image gives off.
But a mirror is not like the moon, which does take ownership.
You have reached the stage of totally deluding yourself by not only ignoring the evidence the moon does not emit its own light, but what is presented before your very eyes.
Here is a picture I took of the moon.
I hope you are not going to make one of your incredibly stupid comments and declare this is another one of my fake images.
What do notice about the image, clearly it is not uniformly lit.
At and near the boundary where the dark and light hemispheres of the moon meet known as the terminator what else do you notice, there are crater details which become less evident the further away from the terminator.
On the opposite side of the terminator there is no crater detail.
At the terminator lunar sunrises and sunsets occur which cast shadows and accentuates the crater detail.
I'm sure even you can comprehend an external light source is required to cast shadows and if the moon is creating its own light instead there can be no shadow detail.
Obviously spherical.
Curved with surface features.
Is that the moon or is it the top of a well photographed from the bottom? Poorly exposed (in this case over exposed) photos make very poor evidence of anything.
Super-zoom. Rough features, not sure of the point.
How can the moon take ownership of light? It's not a legal entity, nor a corporation or a human being. It's a ball of rock. It has no consciousness, not understanding of legal ownership. It is a rock.
Congratulations you have demonstrated the moon does not produce its own light.-
We can swap moon photos all day.
Obviously spherical.
Curved with surface features.
Is that the moon or is it the top of a well photographed from the bottom? Poorly exposed (in this case over exposed) photos make very poor evidence of anything.
Super-zoom. Rough features, not sure of the point.
Early filmmakers inspired by Jules Verne thought the moon was made out of pizza.I thought everyone knew the moon was a shape-shifting potato 800 feet in diameter.
Like a hemisphere?-
Disk with a convex surface, facing earth.
The Moon is the leftover junk from a collision with a Mars-sized planet coalesced by gravity.Created to give light to the earth (along with stars) at night. the sun is nowhere a moon at night it is lights up other areas of earth, Again doing what it was created to do, give light to the earth and not the moon.
(to give light on the earth) twice stated
and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth”; and it was so. Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He made the stars also. God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth,
Early filmmakers inspired by Jules Verne thought the moon was made out of pizza.
This is a very cool picture.
Fly me to The Moon: Frank SinatraWho was it requested transportation to the moon so he could navigate the stars; or something like that?
I think it was a song or something.
Fly me to The Moon: Frank Sinatra
Fly me to the moon
Let me play among the stars
Let me see what spring is like on
Jupiter and Mars
OB
Well, if science fails so hard at explaining "god's creation", here is a very easy and unambiguous test: predict the next solar eclips wihout using any fruit of science. Since science fails so hard, the biblical method must be much more accurate than the scientific one "emeyerite"?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?