Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well anytime you want to model that and prove the moon is lit by the sun. Let me know i would like to see your model in person.
It is simple just take a dark room take a sphere shape (to represent the moon) and a light source to represent the sun and light up the moon while keeping your room dark as seen in sciences outer space.
Oh and also do not show any light from the sun, lighting the moon, the moon should just shine in the room as if it is a light source itself.
For what it's worth, and that may not be much, I find Tom's arguments here more convincing than yours. This is largely because his are arguments and yours seem more like assertions. It's the first occasion in reading hundreds of your posts that I've found myself at odds with your conclusions. Just something for you (and probably me) to reflect on. (Or not.)
Frankly it would be nice if he supported his arguments with a bit more than 'because I say so'. Even a poor link beats no links at all.
Sorry, that is not the way it works. Try again. You need to support your claims. There is no onus on me to see if you are right or not.I’ve given you a pretty comprehensive reading list to get started.
Sorry, that is not the way it works. Try again. You need to support your claims. There is no onus on me to see if you are right or not.
Then why even respond if you cannot make a proper argument? If your evidence is so weak that you cannot even refute a few "superficial Wiki pages" then why bother posting. The work that others do in responding to you mirrors your own posts. You set the bar very low by merely claiming that there are sources that disagree with me.I’m not interested in whether you think I’m right or not. If you are going to engage in discussion, it would be advisable either to educate yourself about it or stick to topics you have some knowledge of. Having some superficial discussion based on a few wiki pages or something of that sort is pointless, unless your aim is to avoid having to evaluate the notions behind your various disjointed comments. Actually I don’t get why your made any of them, what would you say is the point of simply making random assertions about something you know very little about?
Anyway this has been a waste of time, over and out.
If the moon makes its own light, why are there phases?
How?
Huh? The fact that the moon is basically dust and rock is the big problem for it "producing" light.Huh? The moon has phases where it produces light or it doesn't. What's the big problem?
Huh? The fact that the moon is basically dust and rock is the big problem for it "producing" light.
If you say so.,How do you know it's dust and rock? All you have is NASA's Telievision movie.
I will forget all of that phony conspiracy crap, thanks.Forget the fact they are still trying to get to the moon after losing the technology from Apollo. Forget the fact they are still trying to get through van allen radiation belts after doing so in apollo. Forget the fact that prius and tesla have decade battery life while voyager has been going almost 50 years with the same battery (and recharge).
The projective irony is astounding.I mean it's just ridiculous the people have become this gullible. I guess that's why the bible says many are deceived and it makes a distinction between REAL science and falsely so called $cience.
If you say so.,
I will forget all of that phony conspiracy crap, thanks.
The projective irony is astounding.
I note that you did not explain how the moon produces light. Which I would avoid doing if I relied on ancient middle eastern tales for my "science". I do wonder how the moon can 'turn off' its lights to coincide with the earth's shadow being cast on it.....
I'm sure there is a bible verse that will provide details, yes?
Toyota Prius batteries are pretty much dead after 10 years. The voyager batteries kept on going for 50 years and NASA did not share technology? Really??????
Do you realize what you are saying? Conspiracies happen all the time, all through out the world. Your own media tells you conspiracies happen.
Why do you dismiss so easily? Have you done proper research and VENTED both sides of the arugment? Have you PROVED all things using the word of God?
I work in IT and security, and let me tell you....both software and hardware has billions of bugs. Anyone in programming knows you can NEVER get it right the first time. The technology in the 50s were so primitive...it's just unimaginable, it boggles the mind how they could even get to outerspace using that trash.
Programming was so utterly bad that there's even a famous quote by the legend of structured programming edgar dijkstra, "you're doing it wrong". This garbage could not even get off the atmosphere as demonstrated by Neil Armstrong's hoax test flights.
Toyota Prius batteries are pretty much dead after 10 years. The voyager batteries kept on going for 50 years and NASA did not share technology? Really??????
Prisuses don't use nuclear batteries.
Folks, use some discernment, prove all things:
That's Neil Armstring trying to flying the LEM on earth. This is with the worst programming languages around, worse hardware, just primitive garbage technology. A lot of it was rapidly changing.
And with a gravitational force six times as strong it would be much more difficult to fly on Earth. Or did that fact escape you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?