The same goes for you since you deleted something that RC had written without discussing it and added several rules without a consensus. And that announcement was just posted yesterday; there were no posted guidelines before that.
Anyway, since we have both been impolite, and since we are starting over with the wiki process, let's set aside our personal differences for a while and try to work out something that everyone can live with.
Actually, RC flamed me in the wiki. I deleted the portion of his post that contained a flame. I did not delete his rule suggestion.
And as for adding things to the wiki, I did nothing wrong by doing this, since I didn't delete rule suggestions in order to do it. There was one accidental situation when I did a rollback which resulted in deleting a rule suggestion. But it wasn't intentional, as were your deletions which I believe were done more so out of spite than anything else.
When you deleted my entire wiki entry without notice, not all of our active forum members had a chance to have their say on the matter. In fact, several people even agreed to what I had suggested. It was hardly a consensus that agreed to delete it! In fact, the idea here, as stated by Erwin, is to have "
everyone affected by a set of rules to have a voice in setting them up". You did not allow for this to take place before you made your deletions. You had two or three people that agreed with you, and took it upon yourself to assume that that was good enough to warrant a wiki deletion, while knowing full well that there are more members that didn't have a chance to give their input on the matter, which by the way, concerning the matter of not censoring the topic of theistic evolution, the majority has voted against it.
So I don't think it is fair to compare your behavior with what I did. And I still think you owe me an apology.
Anyway, I can agree that we should put this aside.
