BananaSlug
Life is an experiment, experience it!
- Aug 26, 2005
- 2,454
- 106
- 41
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Lie. No evidence for common descent exists in the minutest amount. None. Not beyond the descent from the common kind created ancestor.
Archaeopteryx: bird or theropod dinosaur?Lie. No evidence for common descent exists in the minutest amount. None. Not beyond the descent from the common kind created ancestor.
Please give me a definition of the term, "lie." Then explain how the original paper describing the fossil find was not just a mistake, not just an opinion, but a lie.The connection to man was admitted as false. How many times per thread do you pronounce it over, when you run out of steam? That routine from you is getting comical.
Reptile or mammal?
A lie is something untrue, and specifically ungoldly as well as untrue in any sense I use the word, usually. So, if someone claims a common ancestor for all life, as some pond scum, it is a lie. Now, if one merely quibbles about how kinds evolved, that is not a lie, but mere ignorance.Archaeopteryx: bird or theropod dinosaur?
Tiktaalik: Lobe-finned fish or tetrapod?
Cynodont? Reptile or mammal?
Please give me a definition of the term, "lie." Then explain how the original paper describing the fossil find was not just a mistake, not just an opinion, but a lie.
Notice that's a drawing?Do you mean the side view or top view?It doesn't matter, though. Not at all. What would I care if all reptiles were evolved from assorted created kinds or not? Point? As long as whatever dead thinies you post a picture of evolved from a kind, what else matters? The point being that no rock crack spawned all life. The kinds were the common ancestor.
I forgot about that angle. They do have a knack for creative reconstruction.Notice that's a drawing?
Meaning that parts have probably been filled in.
And we worship a 'god of the gaps'?
Haeckel's spirit lives on, doesn't it?
Probably all they have on this thing is a tooth or something.
Notice that's a drawing?
Meaning that parts have probably been filled in.
And we worship a 'god of the gaps'?
Haeckel's spirit lives on, doesn't it?
Probably all they have on this thing is a tooth or something.
I sometimes wonder if the gestation periods were shorter back then -- for man and animal.I don't have to worry about all that any more, though, because I can accept evolving as something His kinds were able to do in spades at the time.
There is a little more than a tooth or something there.
A lie is a Falsehood. A lie is something that a person communicates that he/she knows is false or untrue. Now that you have a working definition of the meaning of a lie, how about providing us with evidence that the authors of the original paper deliberatly lied.A lie is something untrue, and specifically ungoldly as well as untrue in any sense I use the word, usually. So, if someone claims a common ancestor for all life, as some pond scum, it is a lie. Now, if one merely quibbles about how kinds evolved, that is not a lie, but mere ignorance.
Sure, AVET, go ahead and make slanderous comments about things you are just guessing about. Or is it just willful self-delusion? "Oh, that fossilized skeleton shows me something I don't want to see.... must be made up from a tooth or something!"Notice that's a drawing?
Meaning that parts have probably been filled in.
And we worship a 'god of the gaps'?
Haeckel's spirit lives on, doesn't it?
Probably all they have on this thing is a tooth or something.
Prove me wrong -- show me this thing, and show me this thing as it matches its drawing.Sure, AVET, go ahead and make slanderous comments about things you are just guessing about. Or is it just willful self-delusion? "Oh, that fossilized skeleton shows me something I don't want to see.... must be made up from a tooth or something!"
Me too. If mankind could have children, in say a 3 month pregnancy, that would allow for rapid population growth.I sometimes wonder if the gestation periods were shorter back then -- for man and animal.
I never did figure out how that was a problem. Do we know the timeframe that Adam was in the garden, or Cain? I always assumed that there were girls born were not listed, because they were not the oldest male...so why not have Cain snag one?Ex 1:19 And the midwives said unto Pharaoh, Because the Hebrew women are not as the Egyptian women; for they are lively, and are delivered ere the midwives come in unto them.
This could easily account for where Cain got his wife too.
Questioning the way godless science glues puzzles together seems like a healthy exercise to me? Now if one knew that the puzzle was correct, and lied about it, that is another matter....
Hey dad, how about applying your definition of "lie" to your "brother-in-Christ" here? Or is it only reserved for atheists, agnostics, and theistic evolutionists?
if this is done would you accept anything differently. or will you make up more unfounded excuses.Prove me wrong -- show me this thing, and show me this thing as it matches its drawing.
I believe Usher (or maybe it's Scofield) dates the Fall as approximately one year after the Creation (thus BC 4003), but remember -- God only expelled them from the Garden -- not from Eden, proper.Do we know the timeframe that Adam was in the garden, or Cain?
Questioning the way godless science glues puzzles together seems like a healthy exercise to me? Now if one knew that the puzzle was correct, and lied about it, that is another matter.
Rapid population, unrestricted by present genetic realities was the obvious order of the day.and if people were born fully grown it would solve alot of other problems in the bible too. Also if bother and sister were not really brother and sister or they had some sort of highly condensed super dna that didn't degrade due to incest that would solve alot of bible problems too.
Nope. Adam knew his wife. That is bible lingo for the wild thing.Maybe sex wasn't even required. Maybe the sperm and egg were just mental concepts back that. after all it was a different state. So the man and the women only had to look at each-other and poof a fully formed adult was created with embedded language and ideas.
You guys are great keep it up.
Oh, I see how you look at it. Well, people started visiting all over the place after they left the garden. So why not take a gal with him? Maybe he even had one or two at the time he was banished? By the way, why would the fall be one year after creation? Why not a month, or 5 years, etc?I believe Usher (or maybe it's Scofield) dates the Fall as approximately one year after the Creation (thus BC 4043), but remember -- God only expelled them from the Garden -- not from Eden, proper.
23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
I'm not sure Adam and Eve ever visited Nod.
(They probably did, but I believe their home was Eden.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?