Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Actually, I believe the genus of this find is challenged by the science community (I heard it on a radio discussion).No. It doesnt. I do understand it well enough to challenge it.
Again you're wrong. We are of the genus homo and the species sapien. Homo sapiens.
at least its evidence and not a myth, legend or story.
Evolution again, ftw.
That doesn't mean I have to sing the body electric.You are your body.
I didn't say "human being" --- I said Homo sapien --- and a child of God by adoption.What are you then? A chimpanzee? An alien from planet Nibiru?Or some trans-dimentional visitor from the realm of.... Nah, i don't know. What ARE you if not a human being?
No, literalistically. Specifically, you care more about how it appears to you... and disregard... how it was understood when written, its intended audience, and what that audience was interested in.That doesn't mean I have to sing the body electric.
I take Genesis 1 literally.
Actually, I believe the genus of this find is challenged by the science community (I heard it on a radio discussion).
No --- you can call me a Homo sapien if you want to --- I'll stick with human being.Yes, you are, whether you want to be or not. You can call yourself a unicorn or dragon or dryad gnome whatever, but you are still a Homo Sapien.
So, you're made in the image of god then? Whose image is Shaquille O'Neil made in? Or Yao Ming? Or Paula Abdul? They all look different to me. Taking Genesis literal, who best fits 'in our image' description?That doesn't mean I have to sing the body electric.
I take Genesis 1 literally.
Imagine that, you find intelligent conversation all over....especially here in a Christian Forum.
Says the 26 year old.Bottom line kids,
Does that include the parts that have zero evidence for them and that we know are impossible?The Bible is the complete Word of God and it's all true, every bit of it.
Link?I mean we have already found the base of the Tower of Babel, what more do you want?
This is the non-christian section of the forum.Any Christian
Or anybody who enjoys watching really bad arguments unfold...that doubts for a second that evolution is a myth needs to read "The Case for a Creator" by Lee Strobel or at least put the DVD in your Netflix queue. Anybody that believes that evolution might be true at that point is just in denial.
The people who are lying to you are probably the people who have zero interest in the truth and are only interested in passing along their ideology as truth.For that matter, pick up your Bible and read it and then decide who might be lying to you. The world? The enemy with his plots to steal, kill and destroy?
Nobody whose educated on the subject thinks an accident has anything to do with it.An improbability of accidental design is exactly what points us to God in the first place.
Typical threats.Believe all of it, actually walk in your faith and get on with it. "So, because you are lukewarmneither hot nor coldI am about to spit you out of my mouth." Revelation 3:16
I didn't say "human being" --- I said Homo sapien --- and a child of God by adoption.
Let's back this train up here --- I interpret Genesis 1 via the historical-grammatical method of interpretation.No, literalistically. Specifically, you care more about how it appears to you, rather than how it was understood when written, its intended audience, and what that audience was interested in.
No --- you can call me a Homo sapien if you want to --- I'll stick with human being.
In terms of Godly Images, I'd have to say that whoever best fits is probably a womanTaking Genesis literal, who best fits 'in our image' description?
And I'll be glad to repeat myself here --- I am not a Homo sapien.
All the above.So, you're made in the image of god then? Whose image is Shaquille O'Neil made in? Or Yao Ming? Or Paula Abdul? They all look different to me. Taking Genesis literal, who best fits 'in our image' description?
Please advise.
I actually feel sorry for this little creature to be honest with you. If she had any idea what she was being used for right now she wouldn't appreciate or be pleased with it at all. Though, in the end, she's showing desperity of humanity, so maybe she wouldn't be sad afterall. Cases like this truly do prove we've came from monkeys (or a common ancestor of), because many people that grasp at straws to prove any relation between something like this and a human truly is a monkey in their own sense.
Leave the little creature alone. She'd be in tears by now if she had any idea what you people are trying to relate her to.
Only on paper, bro --- only on paper.Human beings are homo sapiens bro.
I mean, as in "it is not a link at all."
Yes, it does.Doesnt matter if people call you a unicorn.
I'm humankind --- and kinds had no predecessors.You're a human being, which is a synonym (which means 'means the same thing') for homo sapien.
From you guys' perspective --- "unknown life form".So you either a bot, an unknown life form or intellectually dishonest.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?