• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Missing link found by Norwegian scientist

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,649
52,516
Guam
✟5,129,146.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Is the creation still in progress?
Absolutely.
According to Peter, on the Day of God, God is going to suspend the Weak and Strong Nuclear Forces, and the elements on the Periodic Table are going to fly apart --- then God is going to rearrange everything into a New Heaven and a New Earth.

Question: Is this the picture of God you are painting? Someone Who is creating, creating, creating, creating --- then suddenly, in a moment of time --- wipes it all away and reassembles it all?
 
Upvote 0

TheBear

NON-WOKED
Jan 2, 2002
20,653
1,812
✟312,481.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Thenamiracleoccurs.gif
 
Upvote 0

TheReasoner

Former christian, current teapot agnostic.
Mar 14, 2005
10,294
684
Norway
✟36,961.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
According to Peter, on the Day of God, God is going to suspend the Weak and Strong Nuclear Forces, and the elements on the Periodic Table are going to fly apart --- then God is going to rearrange everything into a New Heaven and a New Earth.

Question: Is this the picture of God you are painting? Someone Who is creating, creating, creating, creating --- then suddenly, in a moment of time --- wipes it all away and reassembles it all?

Are you saying the world is a static, unchanging place? That humans perhaps do nt evolve?
If so, how do you explain how we change from womb to grave? Surely we are dynamic creatures in a dynamic world. How can God who is so wonderful, loving and vast, not create? Do not we, who are created in His image wither if we do not create? Is it not best for man to work and create his whole life? As we are created in His image, why would He have stopped creating, when we humans obviously benefit from not stopping creating throughout our lifetime?!
 
Upvote 0

Honkytnkmn

Newbie
Aug 12, 2008
143
4
55
✟15,294.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
And we do. Honestly, have you ever seen how many fossils are out there?


hominids2.jpg


Oh, look, there they are!

Ok, you got 14 in 5 million years. Thats pretty rock solid.

Interesting how you didn't post the one with the dates.


pages5455.jpg



Pic 1 is a tooth.

Pic 2 is a Jaw bone.

Pic 3 is Lucy, we all know of that one

Pic 4, 5, and 6 are all guesstimated around the same time period. Pic 6 is the upper jaw and the forehead, the rest is filled in by educated guess.

Pic 7, 8 and 9 are all guesstimated around the same time period

Pic 10 and 11 are about the same time period give 100,000 years or so.

Pic 12 and 13 are estimated around the same time period.

And we know Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens lived at the same time.

pwnd? I don't think so.

Before the flaming starts, I know they have a lot of these, but these are the best examples.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

thesunbeast

Newbie
Nov 12, 2008
13
2
✟22,643.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Alright. I've read through the thread and I hesitate to even post in here. There seems to be an overabundance of bigotry towards certain people, which I have no tolerance for and is unjustifiable. If someone doesn't agree with you, then retort. If you reply and they keep sticking to the same thing without substance or premises that warrant the same conclusion, then just leave them alone. Don't go in here patronizing people, then expect to be treated with the utmost respect yourself. There are very intelligent arguments on both sides of an issue, but it serves no purpose to have a conversation about fossils and then just start making fun of people on a large scale who don't agree with you.

Well I hope to come in here and have a civilized discussion, but due to my position, I don't know how long it will take before I am lead into an attack of some sort, and my basic view on that is nothing short of bigotry, that I have to "watch what I say" if I don't want to be patronized. This is unfortunate, because there are lots of people with varying views on things from all corners who have very insightful, intelligent, and logical interpretations of epistemological claims, I am one of them, and the patronizing will no doubt prevent certain people from even posting in this thread. I guess I'm going out on all kinds of limbs.

Let me explain myself in order to overcome (hoplefully) any kind of bigot-like foundationless accusations that may come my way or to those like me. I, at 26, hold some views of creation theory. I don't like the terms accociated with religion or a religious interpretation of science. I've loved science sinse I was a little kid. I had a science and chemestry lab in my basement when I was 12, and I have always been facinated with cosmology sinse childhood. My parents, though believing in God, were strongly against anything religious. They are agnostic, and so is my 1 brother. I went through my whole life as an agnostic and I believed in, and understood the principals of evolution sinse I was 12.

I consider myself a Christian now, and I believe I went about it in the right way. I didn't read the Bible for the first time untill age 23. I was always agnostic, being raised by my familty to dislike church. I was agnostic in the sense that I believed in God, but I didn't know if he was really there, and there were alot of contradictions in the Bible.

I was "right brained" as a child, and unfortunetely I had 7 different learning disabilities as a child, and physical. I was forced to go to special ed classes (3 at the same time) and I couldn't retain information, I couldn't tell time if the school's life depended on it, I couldn't tell the difference between 10 and 15 feet, I coulnd't wright, and I had devastating communication skills, and I couldn't do anything physical, I basically couldn't do anything other than be nice. I was what un PC people would call "retarted" with no hope of ever really getting better.

It all went away. Long story that's too much to go into detail right now.

As I delt with the issues, I learned ways to get around them and the left side of my brain started getting stronger and stronger. Untill one day I had no disabilities whatsoever, and yet, my mind, body, and mental capacity kept on growing. The right side of my brain is still the same, and today, I am both "right" and "left" "brained". I can look at things from two completely different perspectives and understand them both. I can do the "spinning girl" test and control which direction she spins using my mind, at will, whenever I want.

Today, I am a certified Personal Trainer, I'm a bodybuilder, I'm a martial artists, I can swing nunchucks while blindfolded, I have a 160 IQ, I have a fantastic long term memory that much of which has "come back" ( I remember when I was 1 years old, clear as day). I was able to do twice the work in college in half the time, despite working full time. I graduated from a 6 month personal training program at #1 in the class, in only 6 weeks.

Yes, I am crazy and eccentric, but the moral of the story is this: I will not tolerate being called stupid. Especially just because I hold to some principals of creation theory. It's best to have back and forth conversation with questions, as opposed to assuming I mean something when I don't and asking how I could mean that.

Anyway, I love having these conversations, but only when they are in good spirit, not an "us vs them" kind of thing.

In this thread I'm going to just try and stay on topic, which is Ida, or fossils in general.
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
What is your main idea, honkyt? Is it that the data on human evolution is on the scanty side, or that evolution in general has scanty evidence?

its not really surprising that there would not be very many human / great ape fossils.
Its frustrating, for sure. Fossil chimps are known only from a few teeth.

(teeth, btw, the most usefully diagnostic part of an animal)

With a number of other organisms, there is a great deal of data.

So... is it all of evolution of just human evolutiop that you are questioning?

Oh, and do you see the point on falsifying vs proving, or is there a question?
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Alright. I've read through the thread and I hesitate to even post in here. There seems to be an overabundance of bigotry towards certain people, which I have no tolerance for and is unjustifiable. If someone doesn't agree with you, then retort. If you reply and they keep sticking to the same thing without substance or premises that warrant the same conclusion, then just leave them alone. Don't go in here patronizing people, then expect to be treated with the utmost respect yourself. There are very intelligent arguments on both sides of an issue, but it serves no purpose to have a conversation about fossils and then just start making fun of people on a large scale who don't agree with you.

Well I hope to come in here and have a civilized discussion, but due to my position, I don't know how long it will take before I am lead into an attack of some sort, and my basic view on that is nothing short of bigotry, that I have to "watch what I say" if I don't want to be patronized. This is unfortunate, because there are lots of people with varying views on things from all corners who have very insightful, intelligent, and logical interpretations of epistemological claims, I am one of them, and the patronizing will no doubt prevent certain people from even posting in this thread. I guess I'm going out on all kinds of limbs.

Let me explain myself in order to overcome (hoplefully) any kind of bigot-like foundationless accusations that may come my way or to those like me. I, at 26, hold some views of creation theory. I don't like the terms accociated with religion or a religious interpretation of science. I've loved science sinse I was a little kid. I had a science and chemestry lab in my basement when I was 12, and I have always been facinated with cosmology sinse childhood. My parents, though believing in God, were strongly against anything religious. They are agnostic, and so is my 1 brother. I went through my whole life as an agnostic and I believed in, and understood the principals of evolution sinse I was 12.

I consider myself a Christian now, and I believe I went about it in the right way. I didn't read the Bible for the first time untill age 23. I was always agnostic, being raised by my familty to dislike church. I was agnostic in the sense that I believed in God, but I didn't know if he was really there, and there were alot of contradictions in the Bible.

I was "right brained" as a child, and unfortunetely I had 7 different learning disabilities as a child, and physical. I was forced to go to special ed classes (3 at the same time) and I couldn't retain information, I couldn't tell time if the school's life depended on it, I couldn't tell the difference between 10 and 15 feet, I coulnd't wright, and I had devastating communication skills, and I couldn't do anything physical, I basically couldn't do anything other than be nice. I was what un PC people would call "retarted" with no hope of ever really getting better.

It all went away. Long story that's too much to go into detail right now.

As I delt with the issues, I learned ways to get around them and the left side of my brain started getting stronger and stronger. Untill one day I had no disabilities whatsoever, and yet, my mind, body, and mental capacity kept on growing. The right side of my brain is still the same, and today, I am both "right" and "left" "brained". I can look at things from two completely different perspectives and understand them both. I can do the "spinning girl" test and control which direction she spins using my mind, at will, whenever I want.

Today, I am a certified Personal Trainer, I'm a bodybuilder, I'm a martial artists, I can swing nunchucks while blindfolded, I have a 160 IQ, I have a fantastic long term memory that much of which has "come back" ( I remember when I was 1 years old, clear as day). I was able to do twice the work in college in half the time, despite working full time. I graduated from a 6 month personal training program at #1 in the class, in only 6 weeks.

Yes, I am crazy and eccentric, but the moral of the story is this: I will not tolerate being called stupid. Especially just because I hold to some principals of creation theory. It's best to have back and forth conversation with questions, as opposed to assuming I mean something when I don't and asking how I could mean that.

Anyway, I love having these conversations, but only when they are in good spirit, not an "us vs them" kind of thing.

In this thread I'm going to just try and stay on topic, which is Ida, or fossils in general.


I am curious... do you find that there are intelligent and thoughtful points to be made on behalf of creationism? If so I would really like to hear what they are. I never heard one yet, but I'm always open to something new.
 
Upvote 0

Honkytnkmn

Newbie
Aug 12, 2008
143
4
55
✟15,294.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
What is your main idea, honkyt? Is it that the data on human evolution is on the scanty side, or that evolution in general has scanty evidence?

its not really surprising that there would not be very many human / great ape fossils.
Its frustrating, for sure. Fossil chimps are known only from a few teeth.

(teeth, btw, the most usefully diagnostic part of an animal)

With a number of other organisms, there is a great deal of data.

So... is it all of evolution of just human evolutiop that you are questioning?

Oh, and do you see the point on falsifying vs proving, or is there a question?

My point is, we see adaptation or micro-evolution happen today. But the Macro-evolution is more of a hypothesis than a theory. We don't have the information needed to make that kind of leap. It seems to me that everyone that claims Macro-evolution is a fact is using Adaptation or micro-evolution as claims to the fact.

They are two separate things. Its one thing to say that over time a species can adapt its another thing to say that it morphs to another species.

Darwin himself understood the importance of the fossil record.

"Why," he asked, "if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? . . . Why do we not find them imbedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?" (The Origin of Species, 1859, Masterpieces of Science edition, 1958, pp. 136-137).

What I see is the lack of evidence (the same as what Darwin saw) and everyone just dismissing it because they can't find the info.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,649
52,516
Guam
✟5,129,146.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hi, sunbeast --- :wave: --- nice to meet you!
Today, I am a certified Personal Trainer, I'm a bodybuilder, I'm a martial artists, I can swing nunchucks while blindfolded, I have a 160 IQ, I have a fantastic long term memory that much of which has "come back" ( I remember when I was 1 years old, clear as day). I was able to do twice the work in college in half the time, despite working full time. I graduated from a 6 month personal training program at #1 in the class, in only 6 weeks.
I find that very impressive.

I won't post my IQ, but suffice it to say, I missed Mensa by only two points.

And for eccentricity's sake, I'll quote what one co-worker once said:

  • I know some pretty weird people, but you're just 'weird'.
I'm curious though --- why would you say this:
Yes, I am crazy and eccentric, but the moral of the story is this: I will not tolerate being called stupid.
Personally, I love it when people call me stupid or crazy; and for being a martial artist, you should realize that they're only creating a blind spot that you can use to your advantage.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,649
52,516
Guam
✟5,129,146.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are you saying the world is a static, unchanging place?
No.
That humans perhaps do nt evolve?
We microevolve.
How can God who is so wonderful, loving and vast, not create? Do not we, who are created in His image wither if we do not create? Is it not best for man to work and create his whole life? As we are created in His image, why would He have stopped creating, when we humans obviously benefit from not stopping creating throughout our lifetime?!
For the purposes of conversation, my point is that creatio ex nihilo was finished after Day Six.

We create things --- but it's creatio ex materia.

God brought this universe up to speed via creatio ex nihilo/materia in a matter of six days.

As I like to explain it: the amount of mass/energy in existence started out at zero, then was raised to its current level over a period of six days.
 
Upvote 0

CACTUSJACKmankin

Scientist
Jan 25, 2007
3,484
128
✟26,817.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
My point is, we see adaptation or micro-evolution happen today. But the Macro-evolution is more of a hypothesis than a theory. We don't have the information needed to make that kind of leap. It seems to me that everyone that claims Macro-evolution is a fact is using Adaptation or micro-evolution as claims to the fact.

They are two separate things. Its one thing to say that over time a species can adapt its another thing to say that it morphs to another species.

Darwin himself understood the importance of the fossil record.



What I see is the lack of evidence (the same as what Darwin saw) and everyone just dismissing it because they can't find the info.
Adaptation is actually very powerful evidence for evolution. adaptations are survival advantages. many species of flower have adaptations that shape it precisely for the insect species that pollinate it. the odor produced by the corpse flower is an adaptation to attract flesh eating insects to pollinate it. Adaptations are examples of evolution in action. Whenever you watch a wildlife documentary and they talk about adaptations, they are talking about evolution. survival advantages are what evolution is all about.
 
Upvote 0

Pesto

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2006
957
27
✟23,797.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
My point is, we see adaptation or micro-evolution happen today. But the Macro-evolution is more of a hypothesis than a theory. We don't have the information needed to make that kind of leap.
But the only difference between micro-evolution and macro-evolution is scale.

Let me ask you this. What is the difference between a long walk and a short walk?

The answer is the distance traveled. Whether you walk from your house to the corner store, or from one side of the state to the other the mechanism is the same. You put one foot in front of another until you get where you're going. Walking across the state is a longer distance, which means it takes more time.

It seems to me that everyone that claims Macro-evolution is a fact is using Adaptation or micro-evolution as claims to the fact.
There's a lot more evidence than just "we observe micro-evolution," but you have to have an accurate understanding of the theory. I think you still have a number of crucial misconceptions.

They are two separate things. Its one thing to say that over time a species can adapt its another thing to say that it morphs to another species.
It's one thing to say a person can walk from their house to the store. It's another thing to say that a person can walk from Los Angeles to New York.

A walk from LA to NY can be made up of many day long hikes, one after another. Why can't "morphing" into another species simply be the result of many small evolutionary steps, one after another? Specifically, what stops this from happening?

Darwin himself understood the importance of the fossil record.

What I see is the lack of evidence (the same as what Darwin saw) and everyone just dismissing it because they can't find the info.
We've found a lot more fossils since Darwin's time. The only reason you see the same lack of evidence, is because you haven't looked very hard.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,649
52,516
Guam
✟5,129,146.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But the only difference between micro-evolution and macro-evolution is scale.
We serve a God Who is a God of boundaries --- and He set boundaries that even nature cannot cross.

Ya --- chimp DNA might be 98% similar to ours --- but that 2% represents a boundary that evolution cannot cross.
 
Upvote 0
A

apwood

Guest
According to Peter, on the Day of God, God is going to suspend the Weak and Strong Nuclear Forces, and the elements on the Periodic Table are going to fly apart --- then God is going to rearrange everything into a New Heaven and a New Earth.

Question: Is this the picture of God you are painting? Someone Who is creating, creating, creating, creating --- then suddenly, in a moment of time --- wipes it all away and reassembles it all?

I'm not following this question. Are you asking me if I believe God is one who creates and creates and then whenever he decides will destroy it all at his own will?
 
Upvote 0

LifeToTheFullest!

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2004
5,069
155
✟6,295.00
Faith
Agnostic
We serve a God Who is a God of boundaries --- and He set boundaries that even nature cannot cross.

Ya --- chimp DNA might be 98% similar to ours --- but that 2% represents a boundary that evolution cannot cross.
HAR1?

Chimpanzee chromosome #2 + common ancestor chromosome #2 = human chromosome #2. Agree?
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Hi, sunbeast --- :wave: --- nice to meet you!I find that very impressive.

I won't post my IQ, but suffice it to say, I missed Mensa by only two points.

And for eccentricity's sake, I'll quote what one co-worker once said:

  • I know some pretty weird people, but you're just 'weird'.
I'm curious though --- why would you say this:personally, I love it when people call me stupid or crazy; and for being a martial artist, you should realize that they're only creating a blind spot that you can use to your advantage.



You did well to miss it. Mensa is for women who like to hang out at Barnes and Noble reading books for free and sipping their latte with one finger up in the air like this.
 
Upvote 0