Miles Stanford

[JM]

Does anyone else read Stanford? (http://withchrist.org/), much of what he has written sounds like mid-Acts writting but he's Acts 2...? Can anyone shed light on this topic?

Thank you

 

[eph3Nine]

Stick with those sound in mid acts doctrine. I used to read alot of Stanford before finding right division...and while he sounds good, he is off base in several areas.

 

[lightninboy]

I agree with JM. Miles Stanford is kind of hard to figure out what to do with.

 

[LamorakDesGalis]

Does anyone else read Stanford? (http://withchrist.org/), much of what he has written sounds like mid-Acts writting but he's Acts 2...? Can anyone shed light on this topic?

Thank you

Miles Stanford is a classical dispensationalist.

Classical dispensationalists use similar terminology and concepts from earlier dispensationalists. The Mid-Acts views also do this to a certain extend, but their tradition and especially terminology took a different turn.

See this for a brief explanation for the different types of dispensationalists.


LDG