Mid-Acts Bible

[JM]

With my apology, apparently there is such a thing as a 'mid acts' Bible. Of course, if the poster wanted to know what was happening with the status of said Bible, why not just go to the website and ask there? The agenda is to stir strife and it's working quite well. Kudos

It seems you owe me an apology. I've tried to contact the site and sent TheScotsMen a PM a while ago and still haven't heard from him.

I was hoping someone else might know.

 

[JMWHALEN]

Doesn't everyone who has private interpretations have to make their own bible up -not to make Scripture plain, but to promote their own private interpretations?

_______________-
"To say Enoch is not part of God's word is to deny the embedded doctrine of the Son of Man and the redemption through His Name which is embedded throughout the entire accepted Canon, for from it the doctrines taught have their roots, as Enoch was God's first [known to us] scribe." -yeshuasavedme

"I have come to believe Enoch is also inspired..always was and is part of the Canon of the Ethiopian Coptic Church since their beginning." -yeshusavedme
_________________________________________
"...make their own bible up..." -yeshusavedme

"You read a different Bible than I read." - yeshuasavedme

"You got that right", ma'am.


How were you able to interpret the scripture in the post w/o a "private interpretation"? TILT.


The hit parade/comedy act and false doctrine of yeshuasaved me rolls on-"the mind turned to mush."

In Christ,
John M.Whalen