• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Method for accepting science

DaneaFL

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2012
410
29
Deep in the bible belt.
✟732.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Was a few years ago. Read an apologetics book for the existence of God and some of it was anti-evolution. I sort of assumed they wouldn't lie and were misguided. Was almost about to complain to our Christian biology teacher about teaching evolution... glad I didn't XD :p

Strangely enough that helped lead to doubt of all of Christianity. Funny how things happen.

Lol pretty much same thing happened to me except I was raised on creationists books. I even wrote antievolution papers in school.

Then I found YouTube with hitchens, Dawkins, Kraus, Tyson, aronra, thunderfoot, and evid3nce.

Needless to say I started to hate all fundamentalists after I realized I had been lied to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Radagast
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟343,148.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Lol pretty much same thing happened to me except I was raised on creationists books. I even wrote antievolution papers in school.

Then I found YouTube with hitchens, Dawkins, Kraus, Tyson, aronra, thunderfoot, and evid3nce.

Needless to say I started to hate all fundamentalists after I realized I had been lied to.

Sooner or later you'll become disillusioned with "science' for exactly the same reason. :(

Any group has it's politics and it's agreed upon dogma. A lot of the dogma that passes for 'knowledge" and even 'science' in the human psyche is pure baloney. Dark energy and inflation are more impotent on Earth than your average religious entity *BY DESIGN*. Guthanity (inflation dogma) is weirder and more ridiculous from my perspective than any 'religion' I can think of. It's like a dead deistic religion where the creator inflation god is dead, never to be seen by any human. "All hail the mighty dead inflation deity".

When the lies come from something passing itself off as 'science', it's even more disgusting IMO than being lied to about a religious belief. They can't legally shove religion down your throat in school, but astronomers can and do stuff "Dark energy" and inflation down your throat in the classroom, and nobody even knows where that stuff even comes from.
 
Upvote 0

Trogool

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2012
2,839
90
✟3,694.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Green
Sooner or later you'll become disillusioned with "science' for exactly the same reason. :(

Any group has it's politics and it's agreed upon dogma. A lot of the dogma that passes for 'knowledge" and even 'science' in the human psyche is pure baloney. Dark energy and inflation are more impotent on Earth than your average religious entity *BY DESIGN*. Guthanity (inflation dogma) is weirder and more ridiculous from my perspective than any 'religion' I can think of. It's like a dead deistic religion where the creator inflation god is dead, never to be seen by any human. "All hail the mighty dead inflation deity".

When the lies come from something passing itself off as 'science', it's even more disgusting IMO than being lied to about a religious belief. They can't legally shove religion down your throat in school, but astronomers can and do stuff "Dark energy" and inflation down your throat in the classroom, and nobody even knows where that stuff even comes from.

When was the last time you read an issue of Science or Cell or PNAS?
 
Upvote 0

Paradoxum

Liberty, Equality, Solidarity!
Sep 16, 2011
10,712
654
✟43,188.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
FYI, I had a similar experience over the concept of eternal torment (hell). That doubt led to a stint with atheism in my case. My return to theism eventually led me to study early "Christian" dogma, which led me to the teachings of Origen and eventually back to "Christianity". Admittedly the "Christianity" I believe in today is quite a different sort of "Christianity" than I believed in as a child. :)

Origen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When I realised how terrible eternal hell is it wasn't as perhaps some other things, but still it probably helped me towards liberal Christianity. What is your type of Christianity? I know you believe God is part of the physical world. I'll try to reply to our other convo soon, but it has turned into to large posts now XD

Lol pretty much same thing happened to me except I was raised on creationists books. I even wrote antievolution papers in school.

Your parents/ church were really into the creationist thing huh? I can see why people raised like that would hate fundamentalists. I find it hard to remember I once believed things I now consider immoral.

Then I found YouTube with hitchens, Dawkins, Kraus, Tyson, aronra, thunderfoot, and evid3nce.

I always found Hitchens and Dawkins too arrogant to take seriously. I'm more ok with Dawkins now. I also watch thunderfoot and love evid3nce's videos. Wish he would make the next one.

How were you convinced by them? I mean alot, of people would try to shut out voices that disagreed with them. :p
 
Upvote 0

driewerf

a day at the Zoo
Mar 7, 2010
3,434
1,961
✟267,108.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
hi guys
I'm sick of people saying science is against the bible
I agree. A lot of creationists claim that Darwin hated god or the bible. Said creationists claim that "evolutionists" are anti christian, anti bibnle, hate god, etc. Of course, this is nonsens.

when all these scientists are christians or thiests
Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627)
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Well, this guy, spent the last 10 years of his life in house arrest, condemned by the RCC.
Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)
Isaac Newton (1642-1727).
Robert Boyle (1791-1867)
Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
an ordained monk. His work has been critical for he foundations of neodarwinism.
William Thomson Kelvin (1824-1907).
I'm glad you mention this guy. He tried to calculate the age of the Earth, and cam with an age of 20 - 40 million years (he didn't know radio activity, so his results were wrong. But it shows that believing in an old Earth and being a christian goes like hand in glove.
Max Planck (1858-1947)
Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
not a christian but believed in a creator
To name some more:

  • George Lemaitre an ordained priest and father of the Big bang Theory
  • Teodesius Dobzhansky, known for his quote that "in biology, nothing makes sense except in the light of evolution".
  • Ken Miller, Roman Catholic, and played a crucial role in debunking ID during the Dover trial.
  • Francis Collins, head of the Human Genome project.
I'm quite sure there are many more.
 
Upvote 0

dougangel

Regular
Site Supporter
May 7, 2012
1,423
238
New Zealand
✟130,556.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I'm sick of people saying science is against the bible

or Bible is against science.
I think a lot science points out there is intelligent design and there is a scientific order to things and the universe is too complex to happen by chance. Proving intelligent design.

Einstein's views about religious belief have been collected from interviews and original writings. These views covered Judaism, theological determinism, agnosticism, and humanism. He also wrote much about ethical culture, opting for Spinoza's god over belief in a personal god
Einsteins veiws changed through his life but u dont like creator, lets say intelligent design or a cause of the big bang.

lol Christians a disagreeing on this site and getting into heated discussions. whats the point about the church persecuting some of those men. My point was they were men of faith helping the cause of science some saying with the inspiration of God.

Cheers
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟30,998.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I always found Hitchens and Dawkins too arrogant to take seriously. I'm more ok with Dawkins now.
I think he can do good education if he wants to. I learned tons from The Ancestor's Tale, and biomorphs are fun. (The Blind Watchmaker as a whole was meh, and I simply found River out of Eden excruciatingly boring, though)

I also watch thunderfoot and love evid3nce's videos. Wish he would make the next one.
A while back I sat down and watched all the anti-pseudoscience stuff from Thunderf00t, AronRa and potholer54. However, my all-time favourite Youtube champion of science is still ckd007. Has a real gift for clarity and visuals IMO. evid3nce doesn't sound familiar, I might need to have a look!
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟343,148.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
When I realised how terrible eternal hell is it wasn't as perhaps some other things, but still it probably helped me towards liberal Christianity. What is your type of Christianity? I know you believe God is part of the physical world. I'll try to reply to our other convo soon, but it has turned into to large posts now XD

I hear you on the "large posts" by the way. :) I'll try to be more focused. :)

I would consider myself to be a Universalist Christian. I once filled out an online questionnaire to see which branch of religion my beliefs most closely fit, and I also scored surprisingly closely to a 'Modern Day Quaker" of all things. :) I think it was a 98 percent fit as I recall.

I ultimately believe that Christ will eventually redeem everyone.

FYI, I was baptized as a Catholic and raised in the Lutheran Church. I became a self professed 'atheist' somewhere around 15-16 and returned to theism in my mid twenties. I don't think I thought of myself as a 'Christian' for a few years after returning to theism and after I studied a little bit about the afterlife beliefs of Judaism and early Christian Theologians like Origen. Oddly enough my "Christianity" was solidified after reading a book by a Hindu Yogi by the name of Paramahansa Yogananda, called 'Autobiography of a Yogi'. If you are ever interested in comparative religion, and would like a more "Eastern" view of things, I highly recommend that book. It actually did more to help me understand "Christianity" than anything other than the Bible itself.

Your parents/ church were really into the creationist thing huh?
No. Actually my father was a big fan of science and my mother wasn't into science at all, and she trusted my father's judgement on such matters. Both of my parents "interpreted" the Bible in a more metaphorical way, not from a literal perspective. I didn't really have a lot of trouble with that aspect of the Bible, but the concept of eternal torment eventually eroded my faith in "religion", and made me really think about life quite differently. I'm still not a huge fan of 'religion' to this very day actually, although I recognize that I participate in one. :)

I didn't really attend all that much Church between the ages of 15 and 50, but I have found myself attending one of the local Christian churches on a semi-regular basis the last couple of years. It's not actually a Universalist Church, but I like a lot of folks in the congregation. At my age, I can easily filter out the dogma that I simply don't agree with.

I can see why people raised like that would hate fundamentalists. I find it hard to remember I once believed things I now consider immoral.
The moral aspect was ultimately what caused me to really think about the concept of "eternal torment" as "moral punishment" for "finite sin". I simply could not reconcile that concept with "Love your enemy", "turn the other cheek", and "be perfect" as God is perfect. It wasn't until I studied the history of Early Christianity, and studied Judaism, particularly the afterlife beliefs of Judaism during the life of Jesus, that I finally understood where "Christianity" took some wrong turns. FYI, the concept of eternal torment comes straight from the "pagan" (that's how the Jews listening the the Jewish Messiah would have perceived the religion of Rome) religion of the Romans, and from the concept of 'hades'. Augustine kludged the religion IMO, probably because he grew up in a pagan religion and never could quite let go of it.

I always found Hitchens and Dawkins too arrogant to take seriously.
FYI, me too. :)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟343,148.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Therein lies the danger in "bad dogma" in any religion, particular "bad dogma" that conflicts with science. It tends to lead to a crisis that results in a lot of folks embracing atheism, not that atheism is necessarily a "final destination" mind you. ;)
 
Upvote 0

DaneaFL

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2012
410
29
Deep in the bible belt.
✟732.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Therein lies the danger in "bad dogma" in any religion, particular "bad dogma" that conflicts with science. It tends to lead to a crisis that results in a lot of folks embracing atheism, not that atheism is necessarily a "final destination" mind you. ;)

I think it is... How can you decide never to believe anything for which there is no evidence and then reconvert into believing things without evidence?

I can't switch off my brain like that.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟343,148.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
I think it is... How can you decide never to believe anything for which there is no evidence and then reconvert into believing things without evidence?

That is a catch 22 of a question IMO because A), you probably still have a chip on your shoulder towards ALL religion (I still carry some grudges to this very day), and B) you have a skewed view of the concept of 'no evidence'. For instance, is there really 'evidence' for inflation, or did Guth just "invent" the evidence to make it fit?

I can't switch off my brain like that.

Really? ;) I strongly suggest that you consider taking up meditation, with or without any theistic overtones. (Buddhists meditate too by the way). Meditation will help you learn to 'focus' your thoughts and control your thoughts. It's also a process that will provide you with the "evidence" that you're looking for if you're willing to consider it (and in my case ask for it).
 
Upvote 0

RickG

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 1, 2011
10,092
1,430
Georgia
✟128,873.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Why do you accept or reject this or that scientific theory?

A true scientist is always skeptical and open to new information and ideas. But when almost the entire scientific community (the published peer review literature) accepts a particular theory, one can be assured that there is quite a bit of supporting evidence behind it.
 
Upvote 0

dougangel

Regular
Site Supporter
May 7, 2012
1,423
238
New Zealand
✟130,556.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hi guys,
boy alot of stuff since I've been away. not much time so Ill just address this for now.

Oh, I have no idea what Einstein believed. Everyone claims things about him. I was just talking about Spinoza, and God for him was the background existence of reality that isn't conscious or intelligent

Well thats not the only thing I listed with Spinoza saying he had mixture of beliefs
But I put him in this list cause he had famous quotes like......

Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree.
 
Upvote 0

[serious]

'As we treat the least of our brothers...' RIP GA
Site Supporter
Aug 29, 2006
15,100
1,716
✟117,846.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Why do you accept or reject this or that scientific theory?

For me I am lucky enough to enjoy science and was good at it when I did it at school. Still I can't possibly accept or reject various theories based on my own full assessment of the theories. Nevertheless, based on my understanding of the scientific method and how science works I find it reasonable to accept scientific consensus as approximate truth. Of course this takes more than accepting what any one scientist says at any one time. This would also be my roughly my method for other subjects as well.

So what I want to ask to those who have high doubts about things like evolution and climate change, is why is this? Why do you consider it reasonable to accept the word of non-scientists or a tiny minority of scientists over the majority? Is this based on the assumption that you are able weed out the incorrect theories without the appropriate training?

I think it's generally a case of treating acceptance of a theory in a binary fashion rather than putting it on a continuum. The big thing I keep noticing with conspiracy theorists is that they have this idea that they must either accept something as true, or reject it as false. Scientists (or science minded people if you prefer) can maintain degrees of certainty. When looking at the mass extinction of the dinosaurs for example, I have a theory I accept as likely (meteor impact), theories that seem plausable (volcanism, methane extrusion) but require more study, theories that don't seem to explain it adequately at present but could be better supported with more research (sea level changes, formation of a super continent) and theories that do not currently fit with observation (flood)

Even things like the standard model of particle physics (which enjoys much broader theoretical consensus than so called "entrenched" theories like evolution or climate change) have credible possible alternate theories waiting in the wings if the Higgs Boson isn't found at required energies. When things appear to contradict the model, they are reported dutifully (see faster than light neutrinos) though people remain skeptical until it can be confirmed or explained.
 
  • Like
Reactions: elahmine
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I agree. A lot of creationists claim that Darwin hated god or the bible. Said creationists claim that "evolutionists" are anti christian, anti bibnle, hate god, etc. Of course, this is nonsens.

....don't make such gross mistakes.


Evolution is a Scientific Theory that specifically excludes any possibility of Spiritual or Supernatural Influence.

That would be both "anti-God" and "anti-religion". If you exclude something, you are "Anti".


Most telling is that Darwin, of all people, should have written at least one sentence to support Theistic Evolution. But he did not. So he was "Anti" as well.
 
Upvote 0