Mary without original sin?

[LogicalFallacy]

The Bible says that the Bible is the ONLY authority?

Michelle

Therefore Catholics should stick with the Bible in order to prove their doctrine, correct?

 

[Miss Shelby]

Where does the Bible say that the Bible is the ONLY authority?

I know you can provide Scripture that says ALL Scripture is inspired. But I've yet to see anything that says ONLY Scripture is inspired.

Michelle

 

[LogicalFallacy]

Where does the Bible say that the Bible is the ONLY authority?

I know you can provide Scripture that says ALL Scripture is inspired. But I've yet to see anything that says ONLY Scripture is inspired.

Michelle

John 8:31...

 

[Miss Shelby]

If you hold to my teaching you are truly my children? Where does it say that teaching is confined ONLY to Scripture?

Michelle

 

[ukok]

So we can all have our own beliefs regardless of what the Bible says, we can just say we are extra-biblical. What an interesting loop-hole! (Think i'll stick with God thankyou!)

You have got to be kidding!

Doesn't the WTS determine itself to be guided by the Holy Spirit to lead all J.W's..doesn't it puport itself to be Tradition itself...this is interesting..i have had J.W's here claim that the Bible alone can not be used to lead J.W's in the Truth...

 

[Miss Shelby]

So we can all have our own beliefs regardless of what the Bible says, we can just say we are extra-biblical. What an interesting loop-hole! (Think i'll stick with God thankyou!)

It was this statement that led me to believe you were protestant. There is no need to try to prove to me a biblical definition for Sola Scriptura if you don't believe in it?

Michelle

 

[LogicalFallacy]

Hi,

I think something like a new teaching about mary would require more than a human 'pass on' tradition, you would need to make it part of the Bible canon.

 

[ukok]

The WTS alter doctrine and claim the light is getting brighter...

 

[Miss Shelby]

Hi,

I think something like a new teaching about mary would require more than a human 'pass on' tradition, you would need to make it part of the Bible canon.

Hi there! It's not a new belief. Been around even before the Bible. Didn't you read what ukok posted? How would a new belief get into the Bible anyways, unless we made up another version?

Michelle

 

[LogicalFallacy]

Hi there! It's not a new belief. Been around even before the Bible. Didn't you read what ukok posted? How would a new belief get into the Bible anyways, unless we made up another version?

Michelle

I not sure how to read you reply;

It's not a new belief. Been around even before the Bible.

So Mary was here before the Bible was written? Are you sure?

as for this;

How would a new belief get into the Bible anyways, unless we made up another version?

So you admit, you would have to re-write the Bible to make Mary anymore than a normal human person.
Am i missing your point?
If you try to add teachings that CONTRADICT what is already written, then you make yourself guilty.

 

[LogicalFallacy]

The WTS alter doctrine and claim the light is getting brighter...

I love the way you highlight "alter doctrine" as if it's altering the Bible. LOL.

 

[Miss Shelby]

Logicalfallacy,

It's been very nice talking to you. Bye bye.

Michelle

 

[LogicalFallacy]

Logicalfallacy,

It's been very nice talking to you. Bye bye.

Michelle

Huh!!!

 

[ukok]

I love the way you highlight "alter doctrine" as if it's altering the Bible. LOL.

I wanted to clarify that the WTS have indeed been known to alter doctrine (completely, as opposed to adding to it), not just expand upon what is already in their own Tradition of beliefs...in fact, let's be honest here..they have altered doctrine that they originally held and then at a later date altered it back again...hence, claiming that the light is getting brighter, doesn't really work with that does it...if the light got brighter and involved doctrine being changed for the first time, did the Holy Spirit not guide the WTS in the Truth in the first place?

If it did, why would it have the WTS reverse doctrine that the Holy Spirit had already led the WTS to change...does the Holy Spirit get confused? Or could it be the WTS is not being led by the Holy Spirit at all?

 

[LogicalFallacy]

I wanted to clarify that the WTS have indeed been known to alter doctrine (completely, as opposed to adding to it), not just expand upon what is already in their own Tradition of beliefs...in fact, let's be honest here..they have altered doctrine that they originally held and then at a later date altered it back again...hence, claiming that the light is getting brighter, doesn't really work with that does it...if the light got brighter and involved doctrine being changed for the first time, did the Holy Spirit not guide the WTS in the Truth in the first place?

If it did, why would it have the WTS reverse doctrine that the Holy Spirit had already led the WTS to change...does the Holy Spirit get confused? Or could it be the WTS is not being led by the Holy Spirit at all?

Can you defend the false teaching of Mary, and why do you resort to smoke and mirrors.

 

[LogicalFallacy]

:topic: LOL

 

[LogicalFallacy]

* Still chuckling*

 

[ukok]

LF,

what on earth are you talking about now! You are right, this has become hilarious beyond the extreme..you commented upon my highlighted text and i simply explained why i had done so. I am assuming that you are older than 4 but your post's have me wondering

Goodnight and God Bless.

 

[LogicalFallacy]

LF,

what on earth are you talking about now! You are right, this has become hilarious beyond the extreme..you commented upon my highlighted text and i simply explained why i had done so. I am assuming that you are older than 4 but your post's have me wondering

Goodnight and God Bless.

Ok, back to the point in question; what makes you think that Mary is superhuman?

 

[ukok]

and who said she was...that's for superman...once again, goodnight, i hope to be back online tomorrow, but it's late here and i have to go for now.

God Bless