Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Many Worlds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sjastro" data-source="post: 77117800" data-attributes="member: 352921"><p>Interesting.</p><p>From a historical perspective the nature of light was an argument on whether it was a wave or particles with various experiments supporting one but not the other.</p><p>Eventually through QM it was shown light has a wave/particle duality.</p><p>Whether history repeats itself with dark matter/modified gravity duality remains to be seen.</p><p></p><p>The problem I see with Sabine's reasoning it makes the development of a QFT for gravity compulsory yet I seem to recall somewhere in one of Sabine's videos this is a pipedream motivated by theorists obsession with symmetry and pretty mathematics rather than the physics which according to her may not be necessary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sjastro, post: 77117800, member: 352921"] Interesting. From a historical perspective the nature of light was an argument on whether it was a wave or particles with various experiments supporting one but not the other. Eventually through QM it was shown light has a wave/particle duality. Whether history repeats itself with dark matter/modified gravity duality remains to be seen. The problem I see with Sabine's reasoning it makes the development of a QFT for gravity compulsory yet I seem to recall somewhere in one of Sabine's videos this is a pipedream motivated by theorists obsession with symmetry and pretty mathematics rather than the physics which according to her may not be necessary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Many Worlds
Top
Bottom