• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Maine Resolution Called For US To TURN Sovereignty Over To UN

cenimo

Jesus Had A 12 Man A-Team
Mar 17, 2002
2,000
78
To your right
Visit site
✟25,182.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Maine resolution called for US to turn sovereignty over to UN! Anti-war gone mad. [font="verdana, arial, helvetica"]Resolution Would Have Given U.S. Sovereignty Away
target=_blank>http://headlines.agapepress.org/arc...afa/122003f.asp
[/font]

By Chad Groening
March 12, 2003

(AgapePress) - Maine's State Legislature has tabled a resolution calling for the United States to turn its national sovereignty over to the United Nations.

The original anti-war resolution was passed by the Maine Senate and sent on to the House. But there, Republican Representative Michael Vaughan says it was amended and sent back to the Senate where one member then had a change of heart.

"A member of the other party -- a senator -- had second thoughts on it and changed her vote," Vaughn said. "It came back in 'non-concurrence' ... and it was tabled."

"We are of the belief and hope," Vaughn says, "that the issue will be dying between the Houses."

Vaughan says the tabled resolution basically endorsed turning national sovereignty over to the United Nations in dealing with Iraq. "The [item] that has been tabled, [was supportive] of exhausting all of the diplomatic measures that could be taken and working through the U.N. -- which was the onerous part it that we didn't like -- believing that we have our own sovereignty."

Vaughan says with a huge state budget deficit, his fellow lawmakers should not be spending their time dealing with national security -- which is not a function of state government anyway.

© 2003 AgapePress all rights reserved.
 

notto

Legend
May 31, 2002
11,130
664
55
Visit site
✟29,869.00
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Is this the same resolution? If so, it seems that there was no call to turn over sovereignty, only a urging to use the UN to disarm Sadam instead of a US military action outside of it.
------------------------------------------
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/breaking_news/5368933.htm

Posted on Tue, Mar. 11, 2003
Measure Urging Bush to Use U.N. Fails
Associated Press

AUGUSTA, Maine - The state House rejected a resolution Tuesday urging President Bush to disarm Iraq through the United Nations and avoid military intervention.

Without a roll call, representatives decided to go along with the Senate, which a week earlier rejected the nonbinding resolution by an 18-17 vote that closely followed party lines.

Republican leaders said the issue was outside the House's purview and the resolution was a waste of time. But Democratic Sen. Ethan Strimling, one of the measure's sponsors, said supporters got their message out that the country is divided over going to war.

Opponents were concerned the resolution could weaken the morale of U.S. troops and the House changed the measure twice to address those concerns, including rewording to emphasize support for American troops.
 
Upvote 0